• Career Stats
    RushingReceiving
    YearGPRrsh/ydsaveTDsrec/ydsaveTDsFSV
    20199 38 119/525 4.4 6 10/69 6.9 1 111
    201816 18 250/935 3.7 9 20/145 7.3 0 182
    201716 10 276/1122 4.1 9 23/125 5.4 0 202
    201615 9 252/1313 5.2 6 29/298 10.3 1 232
  • (Month:Week)
2019 Stats | PHIWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 23% 22% 33% 53% 43% 63% 38% 73% 48% - - - - - - - - 43%
rshYds 44 18 37 87 62 49 50 96 82 - - - - - - - - 525
rushes 6 8 11 15 13 13 11 23 19 - - - - - - - - 119
rshTDs 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - 6
recYds 11 8 0 28 0 0 6 15 1 - - - - - - - - 69
Tar/Rec 3/2 1/1 1/0 4/3 0/0 0/0 2/2 2/1 1/1 - - - - - - - - 14/10
TM Tar% 8% 2% 3% 15% 0% 0% 8% 8% 3% - - - - - - - - 5%
recTDs 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - 1
FScore 5 2 9 29 12 4 5 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101
FS/PPR 7 3 9 32 12 4 7 18 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111
Opp was @ atl det @ gb nyj @ min @ dal @ buf chi bye ne sea @ mia nyg @ was dal @ nyg  
 
2018 Stats | CHIWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 71% 73% 62% 54% - 51% 56% 58% 51% 53% 65% 60% 41% 55% 57% 62% 60% 58%
rshYds 82 35 61 25 - 69 39 81 47 21 63 13 76 101 60 53 109 935
rushes 15 14 24 11 - 14 12 22 14 11 18 7 16 19 19 13 21 250
rshTDs 0 0 1 0 - 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 9
recYds 25 33 20 0 - 0 9 0 0 11 2 2 4 2 15 17 5 145
Tar/Rec 5/5 4/3 2/2 1/0 - 1/0 1/1 0/0 0/0 1/1 1/1 2/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 3/2 2/1 26/20
TM Tar% 15% 12% 6% 4% - 3% 2% 0% 0% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 4% 10% 8% 5%
recTDs 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FScore 10 6 14 2 0 6 10 14 16 3 6 1 8 10 13 13 23 162
FS/PPR 15 9 16 2 0 6 11 14 16 4 7 2 9 11 14 15 24 182
Opp @ gb sea @ ari tb bye @ mia ne nyj @ buf det min @ det @ nyg lar gb @ sf @ min  
 
2017 Stats | CHIWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 57% 48% 63% 51% 56% 68% 89% 72% - 48% 49% 42% 59% 58% 48% 70% - 58%
rshYds 52 7 140 53 76 167 65 102 - 54 125 6 38 147 37 44 9 1122
rushes 13 9 23 18 19 36 21 23 - 15 15 7 13 23 10 22 9 276
rshTDs 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 9
recYds 14 0 26 10 0 9 0 19 - 0 0 13 -5 8 26 0 5 125
Tar/Rec 5/3 1/0 5/5 4/2 0/0 1/1 0/0 5/3 - 0/0 0/0 2/2 2/1 2/1 4/4 0/0 1/1 32/23
TM Tar% 13% 2% 25% 12% 0% 6% 0% 16% - 0% 0% 6% 13% 6% 9% 0% - 7%
recTDs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FScore 12 0 28 12 7 17 6 12 0 5 18 1 3 27 6 16 1 178
FS/PPR 15 0 33 14 7 18 6 15 0 5 18 3 4 28 10 16 2 201
Opp atl @ tb pit @ gb min @ bal car @ no bye gb det @ phi sf @ cin @ det cle @ min  
 

Jordan Howard 2019 Outlook
Philly secured the rights to Howard from the Bears in exchange for a conditional 2020 draft pick. As Profootballtalk.com noted, Howard was entering the final year of his contract with the Bears and his production decreased in 2018. Beyond that, Howard is essentially a straight-line runner who makes his mark more with force than finesse. Those traits always made Howard an awkward fit in Matt Nagy's Chicago offense, despite being the only Bears' running back to start his career with back-to-back 1,000-yard seasons. ... But he's not especially versatile and his production has been based more on volume than anything else. As CBSSports.com noted, Howard never had fewer than 270 touches during any of his three seasons in Chicago. By contrast, Josh Adams led the Eagles with 127 touches last season and since HC Doug Pederson arrived in Philadelphia, no running back has had even 200 touches in this offense. As CBS understated: "That limits [Howard’s] upside. But what really hurts is the team drafting Miles Sanders, which could eliminate Howard's floor as well. ..." All in all, with Sanders, Corey Clement, Josh Adams and others still on the roster, expecting Howard to be more than an early-down hammer in Philly seems like a reach. Don't overpay on draft day.

Jordan Howard 2018 Outlook
After a period of trade speculation, Howard is locked in as the Bears' lead back. Going back to early March, reports claimed Howard was involved in trade talks for ex-Dolphins wide receiver Jarvis Landry. That report further suggested new Chicago HC Matt Nagy and his staff had concerns about their drop-prone power back's inefficiency as a pass catcher. Nagy isn't denying that Howard’s receiving ability is a weakness but insists the Bears can work around the problem. Indeed, when asked at the start of the team's OTAs if Howard would be the team's featured running back for the upcoming season, Nagy replied, "Absolutely, yeah." That makes perfect sense. Just as Howard struggles as a receiver (14 drops on 76 career targets, per Pro Football Focus), 5-6 scatback Tarik Cohen lacks the power to sustain a ground attack between the tackles. Nagy plans to move both backs around, maximizing their value with situational concepts that play to their strengths while minimizing their weaknesses. Worth noting: With Nagy’s more innovative offense, Howard won't be running against nearly as many stacked boxes as he did in former coach John Fox’s plain-vanilla scheme.