2020 Stats | TEN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
100% |
100% |
100% |
- |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
91% |
100% |
96% |
100% |
91% |
96% |
95% |
100% |
98% |
rshYds |
14
|
12
|
9
|
-
|
42
|
0
|
5
|
20
|
3
|
9
|
35
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
21
|
55
|
38
|
266 |
rushes |
3
|
4
|
4
|
-
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
7
|
43 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
7 |
pasYds |
249
|
239
|
321
|
-
|
195
|
366
|
220
|
233
|
158
|
147
|
259
|
221
|
389
|
212
|
273
|
121
|
216
|
3819 |
pasTDs |
2
|
4
|
0
|
-
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
33 |
INTs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
7 |
FScore |
21 |
29 |
15 |
0 |
31 |
33 |
19 |
20 |
16 |
12 |
23 |
21 |
30 |
18 |
39 |
19 |
30 |
384 |
Opp |
@ den
|
jac
|
@ min
|
bye
|
buf
|
hou
|
@ pit
|
@ cin
|
chi
|
ind
|
@ bal
|
@ ind
|
cle
|
@ jac
|
det
|
@ gb
|
@ hou
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | TEN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
rshYds |
-2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
7
|
-3
|
38
|
37
|
-
|
40
|
5
|
19
|
10
|
8
|
20
|
185 |
rushes |
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
-
|
7
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
43 |
rshTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
pasYds |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
144
|
312
|
193
|
331
|
181
|
-
|
259
|
182
|
391
|
279
|
272
|
198
|
2742 |
pasTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
22 |
INTs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
6 |
FScore |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
23 |
21 |
28 |
20 |
0 |
36 |
17 |
32 |
27 |
26 |
19 |
261 |
Opp |
@ den
|
jac
|
@ min
|
pit
|
buf
|
hou
|
bye
|
@ cin
|
chi
|
ind
|
@ bal
|
@ ind
|
cle
|
@ jac
|
det
|
@ gb
|
@ hou
|
|
|
|
2018 Stats | MIA | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
100% |
100% |
100% |
73% |
100% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
100% |
100% |
96% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
97% |
rshYds |
4
|
44
|
26
|
0
|
17
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
14
|
-5
|
13
|
1
|
22
|
9
|
145 |
rushes |
4
|
8
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
32 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
3 |
Tar/Rec |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
TM Tar% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1 |
pasYds |
230
|
168
|
289
|
100
|
185
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
204
|
137
|
265
|
108
|
146
|
147
|
1979 |
pasTDs |
2
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
17 |
INTs |
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
9 |
FScore |
17 |
20 |
29 |
4 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
17 |
26 |
5 |
12 |
12 |
178 |
Opp |
@ mia
|
hou
|
@ jac
|
phi
|
@ buf
|
bal
|
@ lac
|
bye
|
@ dal
|
ne
|
@ ind
|
@ hou
|
nyj
|
jac
|
@ nyg
|
was
|
ind
|
|
|
|
Ryan Tannehill 2020 Outlook
When the Titans acquired Tannehill last offseason, it was to serve as a backup to Marcus Mariota. Tannehill had a strong camp and preseason, but Tennessee remained committed to Mariota as the starter. That all changed after a disappointing 2-4 start, culminating in a shutout loss to the Broncos in October. HC Mike Vrabel replaced Mariota with Tannehill during that game, then announced that the former Dolphin would take over as the starter the following week against the Chargers. Under Tannehill’s direction, the Titans' offense blossomed. The veteran finished the season with a league-best 117.5 passer rating and also led the NFL in yards per attempt (9.6) topped off by a 70.3 completion percentage. Tannehill completed 201 of 286 passes for 2,742 yards with 22 touchdowns and just six interceptions, leading the Titans to a 7-3 regular season record in his 10 starts, plus two more wins in the postseason to put the Titans in the AFC Championship Game at Kansas City. The Titans rewarded him with a four-year deal worth $118 million just before free agency opened. From a fantasy perspective, Tannehill finished as a top-10 fantasy QB in 80 percent of his starts (tying Lamar Jackson for games in the top-10). He heads into 2020 with a secure role in the offense and he isn’t without upside.
Ryan Tannehill 2019 Outlook
The Dolphins traded Tannehill to the Titans for a seventh-round pick in the 2019 NFL Draft and a 2020 fourth-round pick. The Titans also received a 2019 sixth-round pick in the swap. ... His departure doesn't come as a big surprise considering reports surfaced that the Dolphins were expected to go in a different direction at the quarterback position under HC Brian Flores. Tannehill entered the league in 2012 as the eighth overall pick with the Dolphins, but he never lived up to his lofty draft status. He posted a 42-46 record over six seasons, while throwing for 20,434 yards and 123 touchdowns with 75 interceptions. He departs Miami with a career 62.8 completion percentage and an 87 passer rating, and money left on the table. Before the trade, Tannehill had two years remaining on his contract and would've been paid a base salary of $18.7 million in 2019 and $19.4 million in 2020. A fresh start, though, could work out for Tannehill, who turned 31 in July, as he won't have to handle the pressure typically associated with a starting quarterback. Marcus Mariota is the Titans' franchise quarterback and Tannehill projects as Mariota's primary backup, a job that Mariota’s recent injury history suggests could lead to playing time.
Ryan Tannehill 2018 Outlook
As USA Today pointed out, after not selecting a quarterback during the 2018 NFL Draft, the Dolphins are (once again) putting all of their faith in Tannehill. If that's smart or not remains to be seen. Tannehill has missed the Dolphins last 20 games due to a couple of ACL injuries. First, he sprained his ACL in December of 2016, which caused him to miss the Dolphins final four games of that season. Then Tannehill sustained a season-ending ACL injury last August during training camp. Nonetheless, even if the Dolphins had selected a quarterback during the draft, they have said on countless occasions that Tannehill would remain the starter during the 2018 season. So what’s to like? In his first season playing under HC Adam Gase in 2016, Tannehill achieved career-highs in completion percentage (67.1) yards per attempt (7.7), and passer rating (93.5) while helping the Dolphins to their first playoff appearance since 2008. Athleticism is a huge part of Tannehill’s game and helps him salvage plays where he holds the ball too long. Even so, he has yet to prove that he can make the players around him better on a weekly basis. Also, Tannehill has the toughest schedule among quarterbacks during the fantasy playoffs. Perhaps the best thing Tannehill offers prospective fantasy owners at this point is a clear lock on the starting role in Miami.
| | |