| 2017 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
70% |
74% |
66% |
72% |
77% |
- |
84% |
72% |
73% |
50% |
65% |
70% |
61% |
75% |
65% |
71% |
- |
71% |
rshYds |
110
|
9
|
21
|
76
|
63
|
-
|
91
|
151
|
25
|
49
|
114
|
49
|
93
|
156
|
50
|
71
|
10
|
1138 |
rushes |
22
|
12
|
14
|
20
|
19
|
-
|
23
|
27
|
12
|
8
|
13
|
22
|
15
|
32
|
20
|
17
|
11
|
287 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
6 |
| recYds |
49
|
34
|
48
|
32
|
26
|
-
|
31
|
22
|
0
|
11
|
12
|
30
|
9
|
0
|
46
|
76
|
22
|
448 |
| Tar/Rec |
6/5 |
7/6 |
7/7 |
3/3 |
9/6 |
- |
7/5 |
7/6 |
1/0 |
5/3 |
1/1 |
4/4 |
5/2 |
0/0 |
5/4 |
7/5 |
3/2 |
77/59 |
| TM Tar% |
22% |
28% |
27% |
17% |
26% |
- |
22% |
26% |
3% |
19% |
3% |
14% |
15% |
0% |
18% |
18% |
- |
18% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
| FScore |
15 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
8 |
0 |
24 |
23 |
2 |
6 |
24 |
7 |
10 |
21 |
21 |
14 |
3 |
206 |
| FS/PPR |
20 |
10 |
13 |
13 |
14 |
0 |
29 |
29 |
2 |
9 |
25 |
11 |
12 |
21 |
25 |
19 |
5 |
265 |
| Opp |
nyj
|
@ car
|
den
|
@ atl
|
@ cin
|
bye
|
tb
|
oak
|
@ nyj
|
no
|
@ lac
|
@ kc
|
ne
|
ind
|
mia
|
@ ne
|
@ mia
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
86% |
92% |
75% |
70% |
80% |
62% |
40% |
- |
74% |
- |
31% |
73% |
62% |
83% |
61% |
75% |
22% |
65% |
rshYds |
58
|
59
|
110
|
70
|
150
|
140
|
11
|
-
|
85
|
-
|
33
|
103
|
130
|
27
|
153
|
128
|
10
|
1267 |
rushes |
16
|
15
|
17
|
19
|
18
|
19
|
8
|
-
|
21
|
-
|
5
|
19
|
17
|
12
|
19
|
24
|
5
|
234 |
| rshTDs |
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
13 |
| recYds |
12
|
31
|
6
|
38
|
8
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
35
|
-
|
12
|
31
|
61
|
81
|
16
|
17
|
6
|
356 |
| Tar/Rec |
4/4 |
5/4 |
4/3 |
6/6 |
2/2 |
2/1 |
0/0 |
- |
5/4 |
- |
3/2 |
2/2 |
7/7 |
7/6 |
3/3 |
6/5 |
1/1 |
57/50 |
| TM Tar% |
18% |
17% |
16% |
16% |
10% |
8% |
0% |
- |
15% |
- |
11% |
11% |
20% |
28% |
12% |
15% |
3% |
14% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
13 |
9 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
32 |
1 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
19 |
16 |
28 |
20 |
1 |
246 |
| FS/PPR |
17 |
13 |
26 |
22 |
17 |
33 |
1 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
12 |
27 |
26 |
22 |
31 |
25 |
2 |
296 |
| Opp |
@ bal
|
@ nyj
|
ari
|
@ ne
|
@ lar
|
sf
|
@ mia
|
ne
|
@ sea
|
bye
|
@ cin
|
jac
|
@ oak
|
pit
|
cle
|
mia
|
@ nyj
|
|
|
| |
| 2015 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| rshYds |
41
|
89
|
16
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
68
|
-
|
112
|
112
|
82
|
70
|
112
|
74
|
29
|
-
|
-
|
895 |
rushes |
17
|
15
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
18
|
-
|
16
|
19
|
20
|
19
|
21
|
20
|
10
|
-
|
-
|
203 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
3 |
| recYds |
46
|
27
|
10
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
36
|
-
|
7
|
47
|
41
|
31
|
0
|
35
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
292 |
| Tar/Rec |
4/3 |
4/3 |
3/1 |
- |
- |
4/2 |
4/2 |
- |
2/2 |
5/5 |
10/6 |
5/3 |
1/0 |
7/4 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
50/32 |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
2 |
| FScore |
8 |
11 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
17 |
15 |
18 |
16 |
11 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
148 |
| FS/PPR |
11 |
14 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
12 |
0 |
19 |
20 |
24 |
19 |
11 |
14 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
180 |
| Opp |
ind
|
ne
|
mia
|
nyg
|
@ ten
|
cin
|
@ jac
|
bye
|
mia
|
@ nyj
|
@ ne
|
@ kc
|
hou
|
@ phi
|
@ was
|
dal
|
nyj
|
|
|
| |
LeSean McCoy 2017 Outlook
For the second year in a row the Bills led the NFL in rushing in 2016, averaging 164.4 yards per game. Even though McCoy missed the equivalent of three games, he had a brilliant season and finished with 1,267 yards and averaged a whopping 5.4 per carry, third-best among any back with at least 100 carries. Injury issues notwithstanding, McCoy continued to produce at a remarkable rate. But is it sustainable? As ESPN.com's Mike Clay pointed out, McCoy's carry share has progressively decreased from 75 percent in 2011 to right around 70 percent during the 2012-14 seasons to 62 percent in 2015 (his first season with Buffalo) and finally to 58 percent in 2016. McCoy's snap and pass-down usage have also trended downward, although his target share has held up pretty well. McCoy turns 29 this year, and Buffalo is unlikely to be quite as run-heavy with Rex Ryan out of the picture. But with his prime competition for touches last year, Mike Gillislee, moving on as a free agent this offseason, McCoy remains a strong RB1 option in 2017.
LeSean McCoy 2016 Outlook
McCoy, who has run for over 1,000 yards in every NFL season he's played at least 15 games, was limited to 12 contests because of injury in his first season with Buffalo. He finished with 895 yards rushing, and the Bills' offense jumped from 25th to first last year in total rushing yards. There is always that risk of injury with any player on any team, but imagine the stats the Bills would have tallied if McCoy were healthy all year. In the 2015 season, McCoy averaged 4.4 yards a run and had three rushing touchdowns. His receiving stats add more to his value. He caught-and-ran for nearly 300 yards and added two more touchdowns. But what about Karlos Williams? And Mike Gillislee? Well, according to Scout's Ryan Talbot, a healthy McCoy can expect to handle 80 percent of the workload this season. Williams will certainly contribute and could be a concern in goal-line and short-yardage situations, but McCoy is a true three-down back capable of handling all aspects of the job. That said, don't expect to see much of him until the regular season as the Bills try to keep McCoy healthy.
| | |
