2022 Stats | CIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
89% |
68% |
77% |
16% |
86% |
84% |
98% |
62% |
- |
79% |
83% |
93% |
1% |
80% |
88% |
- |
85% |
73% |
recYds |
27
|
71
|
93
|
124
|
-
|
47
|
93
|
49
|
60
|
-
|
148
|
114
|
35
|
-
|
33
|
128
|
-
|
7
|
1029 |
Tar/Rec |
2/2 |
10/6 |
7/5 |
9/7 |
- |
9/6 |
7/5 |
6/3 |
8/7 |
- |
13/9 |
9/7 |
5/3 |
- |
8/5 |
9/8 |
- |
7/1 |
109/74 |
TM Tar% |
- |
29% |
20% |
30% |
0% |
28% |
17% |
18% |
28% |
- |
36% |
25% |
16% |
0% |
21% |
18% |
- |
0% |
20% |
recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
7 |
FScore |
2 |
13 |
9 |
18 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
10 |
6 |
0 |
14 |
17 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
144 |
FS/PPR |
4 |
19 |
14 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
14 |
13 |
13 |
0 |
23 |
24 |
12 |
0 |
14 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
218 |
Opp |
pit
|
@ dal
|
@ nyj
|
mia
|
@ bal
|
@ no
|
atl
|
@ cle
|
car
|
bye
|
@ pit
|
@ ten
|
kc
|
cle
|
@ tb
|
@ ne
|
buf
|
bal
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | CIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
74% |
91% |
- |
- |
70% |
57% |
67% |
77% |
76% |
- |
80% |
63% |
- |
75% |
87% |
84% |
83% |
- |
75% |
recYds |
58
|
60
|
-
|
-
|
32
|
44
|
62
|
97
|
78
|
-
|
15
|
114
|
138
|
114
|
23
|
194
|
62
|
10
|
1101 |
Tar/Rec |
5/4 |
10/6 |
- |
- |
7/5 |
6/3 |
15/7 |
6/4 |
8/6 |
- |
3/2 |
8/6 |
14/9 |
7/5 |
3/2 |
13/12 |
5/3 |
4/1 |
114/75 |
TM Tar% |
19% |
36% |
- |
- |
19% |
21% |
42% |
18% |
20% |
- |
11% |
36% |
- |
21% |
14% |
28% |
13% |
- |
23% |
recTDs |
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
6 |
FScore |
11 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
31 |
6 |
1 |
146 |
FS/PPR |
15 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
7 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
0 |
3 |
23 |
28 |
16 |
4 |
43 |
9 |
2 |
221 |
Opp |
min
|
@ chi
|
@ pit
|
jac
|
gb
|
@ det
|
@ bal
|
@ nyj
|
cle
|
bye
|
@ lvr
|
pit
|
lac
|
sf
|
@ den
|
bal
|
kc
|
@ cle
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | CIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
22% |
65% |
79% |
57% |
81% |
81% |
84% |
78% |
- |
85% |
91% |
92% |
90% |
90% |
100% |
84% |
7% |
75% |
rshYds |
-
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
0
|
2
|
7
|
6
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
28 |
rushes |
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
5 |
rshTDs |
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0 |
recYds |
-
|
35
|
40
|
77
|
62
|
125
|
71
|
78
|
-
|
115
|
26
|
44
|
56
|
49
|
31
|
99
|
-
|
908 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
6/3 |
9/5 |
7/4 |
8/4 |
8/6 |
5/5 |
9/6 |
- |
9/7 |
10/3 |
5/5 |
8/5 |
8/5 |
6/3 |
9/6 |
- |
107/67 |
TM Tar% |
0% |
11% |
21% |
20% |
29% |
22% |
11% |
26% |
- |
29% |
23% |
23% |
30% |
22% |
55% |
24% |
0% |
21% |
recTDs |
-
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
6 |
FScore |
0 |
3 |
16 |
9 |
6 |
12 |
13 |
8 |
0 |
17 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
15 |
0 |
129 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
6 |
21 |
13 |
10 |
18 |
18 |
14 |
0 |
24 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
21 |
0 |
196 |
Opp |
lac
|
@ cle
|
@ phi
|
jac
|
@ bal
|
@ ind
|
cle
|
ten
|
bye
|
@ pit
|
@ was
|
nyg
|
@ mia
|
dal
|
pit
|
@ hou
|
bal
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | CIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
recYds |
-
|
35
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
35 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
6/3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6/3 |
TM Tar% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
recTDs |
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
FScore |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
Opp |
lac
|
@ cle
|
@ phi
|
jac
|
@ bal
|
@ ind
|
cle
|
ten
|
bye
|
@ pit
|
@ was
|
nyg
|
@ mia
|
dal
|
pit
|
@ hou
|
bal
|
|
|
|
Tee Higgins 2022 Outlook
Higgins suffered a shoulder injury early in the 2021 season but put off surgery until March, helping the Bengals reach the Super Bowl before falling to the Los Angeles Rams. The young wideout told Geoff Hobson of the team's official website in mid-April that he plans to be ready for the start of training camp. "That's the plan," Higgins said of being healthy for camp. ... Higgins suffered the shoulder injury in Week 2, missing the next two games. As NFL.com suggested, the injury provides impressive context to the receiver's first career 1,000-yard season. Despite missing the two contests, the 23-year-old netted 1,091 yards and six TDs on 74 catches. Had the Bengals hung onto their fourth-quarter Super Bowl lead, Higgins might have been named MVP of the contest with his 100 yards and two TDs. ... While Ja'Marr Chase's record-setting rookie campaign overshadowed Higgins' play, the Clemson product has developed into a dangerous threat in his own right. In fact, it's fair to say the Bengals' trio of Higgins, Chase and Tyler Boyd given them one of the top units in the league. Each member of this threesome perfectly complements the others and adds to their respective effectiveness. With Higgins in line to be healthy for camp, a Year 3 bump in production isn't out of the question in an explosive Bengals offense.
Tee Higgins 2021 Outlook
According to SBNation's Dadio Makdook, "Regardless of whether the Bengals select Ja'Marr Chase in the first round [they did], they could have a true star at wideout (this) year. ..." And that star could be Higgins. ESPN.com's Ben Baby backed that contention, explaining it as follows: "I think Tee has the potential to be a WR1. I thought he looked really good, and the thing is: He is really young. I talked to his old position coach at Clemson. I remember he told me right after the Bengals drafted him, they said, 'His rookie year is not going to be anything like his second year, because he's still so raw athletically.' So he's really going to come into his own in 2021. So this is going to be Higgins' breakout year. ..." As for concerns about Chase being a limiting factor, Baby pointed to A.J. Green's 104 targets from last year which will need to be replaced with Green moving on to Arizona this offseason. Moreso, almost 45 percent of those targets (46) came in just four combined games early in the season. Even if the heralded rookie steps in and grabs 100-plus targets, there’s no reason to believe Higgins won't still get sufficient work to have the hoped-for breakout.
Tee Higgins 2020 Outlook
As numberFire.com's JJ Zachariason suggested, if you're drafting Higgins, you're doing so expecting him to be an A.J. Green replacement, and assume that he won't give you a ton of Year 1 production. There's nothing wrong with that -- dynasty isn't just about the short-term payoff. Higgins does have pretty serious competition in Year 1, though, with Green, Tyler Boyd, and John Ross still on the Cincinnati roster and we shouldn't expect him to blow up without an injury. All that said, Higgins profiles as a burner with size. NFL Network's Cynthia Frelund believes two things pop out when reviewing Higgins' Clemson resume as it relates to future success with the Bengals: Deep receptions and contested catches. With the third-most receiving yards on deep targets among Power 5 receivers last season (565, per PFF) and the third-most contested receptions in the ACC since 2018 (23, per PFF; it should be noted that these came against a high percentage of opposing teams' best defenders), Higgins projects to be a key part of HC Zac Taylor's long-term plans along with No. 1 overall pick Joe Burrow. Higgins is still worth a late-round pick in this year's redraft leagues, but it's the above-mentioned Dynasty format where his real appeal lies.
| | | |