2021 Stats | BAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
69% |
72% |
67% |
62% |
90% |
74% |
86% |
- |
82% |
75% |
- |
75% |
86% |
95% |
89% |
92% |
76% |
82% |
80% |
rshYds |
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5 |
rushes |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
69
|
113
|
53
|
91
|
125
|
35
|
80
|
-
|
116
|
37
|
-
|
51
|
55
|
41
|
43
|
44
|
28
|
27
|
1008 |
Tar/Rec |
6/6 |
10/6 |
7/3 |
5/4 |
10/9 |
5/4 |
14/5 |
- |
12/9 |
13/6 |
- |
10/8 |
7/5 |
8/5 |
14/10 |
9/5 |
8/3 |
8/3 |
146/91 |
TM Tar% |
21% |
40% |
26% |
15% |
23% |
19% |
35% |
- |
29% |
33% |
- |
32% |
19% |
21% |
36% |
24% |
28% |
28% |
27% |
recTDs |
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6 |
FScore |
13 |
17 |
5 |
15 |
24 |
3 |
14 |
0 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
137 |
FS/PPR |
19 |
23 |
8 |
19 |
33 |
7 |
19 |
0 |
20 |
9 |
0 |
13 |
10 |
9 |
14 |
9 |
5 |
5 |
228 |
Opp |
@ lvr
|
kc
|
@ det
|
@ den
|
ind
|
lac
|
cin
|
bye
|
min
|
@ mia
|
@ chi
|
cle
|
@ pit
|
@ cle
|
gb
|
@ cin
|
lar
|
pit
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | BAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
63% |
68% |
79% |
75% |
86% |
85% |
- |
94% |
86% |
94% |
72% |
78% |
82% |
87% |
79% |
63% |
58% |
78% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
101
|
42
|
13
|
86
|
77
|
57
|
-
|
3
|
38
|
14
|
-
|
85
|
39
|
50
|
98
|
25
|
41
|
769 |
Tar/Rec |
6/5 |
6/5 |
6/2 |
8/4 |
10/6 |
6/4 |
- |
2/1 |
5/3 |
7/2 |
- |
8/4 |
8/5 |
6/2 |
7/6 |
4/4 |
8/5 |
97/58 |
TM Tar% |
24% |
26% |
22% |
35% |
32% |
25% |
- |
8% |
22% |
18% |
0% |
0% |
47% |
32% |
29% |
17% |
42% |
24% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
8 |
FScore |
10 |
4 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
14 |
9 |
11 |
9 |
8 |
16 |
125 |
FS/PPR |
15 |
9 |
3 |
12 |
19 |
9 |
0 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
18 |
14 |
13 |
15 |
12 |
21 |
183 |
Opp |
cle
|
@ hou
|
kc
|
@ was
|
cin
|
@ phi
|
bye
|
pit
|
@ ind
|
@ ne
|
ten
|
@ pit
|
dal
|
@ cle
|
jac
|
nyg
|
@ cin
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | BAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
recYds |
147
|
86
|
49
|
22
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
48
|
80
|
23
|
42
|
1
|
-2
|
45
|
6
|
15
|
584 |
Tar/Rec |
5/4 |
13/8 |
9/2 |
7/4 |
5/3 |
- |
- |
- |
4/3 |
4/4 |
4/2 |
7/5 |
2/1 |
3/3 |
4/4 |
2/1 |
2/2 |
71/46 |
recTDs |
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
7 |
FScore |
26 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
14 |
2 |
16 |
0 |
-1 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
100 |
FS/PPR |
30 |
16 |
6 |
6 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
18 |
4 |
21 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
3 |
146 |
Opp |
cle
|
@ hou
|
kc
|
@ was
|
cin
|
@ phi
|
pit
|
bye
|
@ ind
|
@ ne
|
ten
|
@ pit
|
dal
|
@ cle
|
jac
|
nyg
|
@ cin
|
|
|
|
Marquise Brown 2022 Outlook
After losing Christian Kirk in free agency, the Cardinals bolstered their receiving corps by trading for Brown during the first round of April's draft. Brown had wanted out of Baltimore for a while due to the offensive system. Now, he'll reunite with his former college quarterback Kyler Murray in the desert. Brown caught 91 passes for 1,008 yards with six touchdowns in 2021. No Cardinals receiver had over 1,000 yards last season. Kirk was the closest with 982 yards on 77 receptions. But four days after the trade, the NFL announced it had suspended new teammate DeAndre Hopkins for the first six games of the 2022. For a few days, it looked like Murray was going to have one of the best one-two combinations in football. Instead, Brown will be asked to play a greater role. Fortunately, as ESPN.com's Josh Weinfuss noted, one hope in trading for Brown was that, should Hopkins go down again, they would have Brown to fill his role. Now that situation is a reality, it's fortuitous that Murray has a rapport with Brown. The two were college teammates at Oklahoma in 2017 and 2018, the latter of which saw Brown accumulate 1,318 yards and 10 touchdowns on 75 catches. As much we still might still prefer to pay WR3 prices for the former Raven, expecting him to return full WR2 value isn't a reach and paying for it isn't unreasonable.
Marquise Brown 2021 Outlook
There's been a lot of praise for the Ravens' new-look receiving corps, but Ebony Bird's Chris Schisler is expecting big things for one of the youngest receivers already on the roster. "The Ravens' top receiver in the 2021 season is going to be a player they didn't add this offseason," Schisler wrote. Schisler said Brown was one of the biggest winners from the draft and expects him to have a Pro Bowl season. It's worth noting Brown led all wide receivers on the Ravens last year with career highs in receiving yards and touchdowns. That came during a season in which Baltimore ranked last in passing attempts (404), and Lamar Jackson missed one regular-season game because of COVID-19. There are reasons to believe Brown will continue to improve in a Ravens offense that boasts a number of new weapons. Brown's post-season performances also speak to his potential. They've arguably been some of his best play, as he's racked up 18 catches for 322 yards in three games. Schisler said a realistic expectation for Brown this season would be 1,200 yards and 11 touchdowns. Of course, for that to happen the Ravens would have to make good on offensive coordinator Greg Roman's suggestion the team will throw more. That doesn't seem like the safest bet.
Marquise Brown 2020 Outlook
Brown found his way into the NFL record books, sped past defensive backs and proved to be the team's best weapon in its passing game in the playoffs. And as ESPN.com's Jamison Hensley suggested, the most impressive part is that Brown provided only a glimpse of what he could do. Team officials acknowledged their top deep threat hadn't fully healed from his February 2019 Lisfranc foot surgery and as a result his contributions were missing in several games. The expectation is Brown, who had the screw in his foot removed this February, will become faster and more impactful in his second season. A faster Hollywood might be just the thing to boost the weakest area in Lamar Jackson's game. Jackson was one of the least productive deep-ball passers in the league. He completed 17 passes that traveled at least 20 yards in the air last season, which ranked 22nd in the NFL. But, if Brown is more explosive in 2020, Jackson's 36.2 completion rate on those deep passes should improve. Remember, Brown showed flashes of being a dangerous playmaker on the outside, tying a Ravens’ rookie record with seven touchdown catches and posting the fifth-fastest average maximum speed by an NFL wide receiver. With defenses stacking the box to stop Baltimore's run game, Brown will have opportunities for big plays and that could make him a solid fantasy value at his 2020 price.
| | |