| 2020 Stats | ATL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
78% |
65% |
63% |
64% |
83% |
85% |
73% |
80% |
72% |
- |
87% |
47% |
63% |
58% |
66% |
65% |
68% |
70% |
| recYds |
38
|
72
|
1
|
51
|
8
|
57
|
68
|
54
|
62
|
-
|
-
|
48
|
9
|
7
|
21
|
47
|
28
|
571 |
| Tar/Rec |
5/3 |
8/5 |
3/1 |
6/4 |
6/2 |
4/4 |
7/6 |
7/5 |
8/7 |
- |
- |
8/4 |
4/1 |
3/1 |
5/4 |
6/5 |
6/4 |
86/56 |
| TM Tar% |
10% |
22% |
8% |
18% |
18% |
11% |
18% |
24% |
23% |
- |
0% |
22% |
11% |
9% |
10% |
15% |
15% |
15% |
| recTDs |
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
6 |
| FScore |
3 |
13 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
11 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
10 |
8 |
93 |
| FS/PPR |
6 |
18 |
7 |
9 |
2 |
15 |
12 |
10 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
15 |
12 |
149 |
| Opp |
sea
|
@ dal
|
chi
|
@ gb
|
car
|
@ min
|
det
|
@ car
|
den
|
bye
|
@ no
|
lvr
|
no
|
@ lac
|
tb
|
@ kc
|
@ tb
|
|
|
| |
| 2019 Stats | BAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| recYds |
41
|
1
|
14
|
39
|
32
|
4
|
10
|
-
|
15
|
20
|
16
|
-
|
21
|
73
|
19
|
9
|
35
|
349 |
| Tar/Rec |
3/3 |
1/1 |
5/2 |
2/2 |
4/4 |
1/1 |
2/1 |
- |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
- |
4/3 |
3/3 |
2/1 |
3/1 |
2/2 |
38/30 |
| recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
| FScore |
4 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
46 |
| FS/PPR |
7 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
76 |
| Opp |
sea
|
@ dal
|
chi
|
@ gb
|
car
|
@ min
|
det
|
@ car
|
den
|
bye
|
@ no
|
lvr
|
no
|
@ lac
|
tb
|
@ kc
|
@ tb
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | BAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24% |
24% |
26% |
44% |
44% |
- |
44% |
27% |
26% |
25% |
39% |
27% |
27% |
31% |
| recYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
29
|
21
|
-
|
-
|
25
|
-
|
-
|
20
|
18
|
43
|
163 |
| Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2/1 |
1/0 |
2/0 |
3/2 |
2/1 |
- |
- |
4/3 |
- |
- |
3/3 |
2/1 |
4/2 |
23/13 |
| TM Tar% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4% |
3% |
0% |
7% |
6% |
- |
0% |
17% |
0% |
0% |
15% |
10% |
17% |
6% |
| recTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
22 |
| FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
35 |
| Opp |
buf
|
@ cin
|
den
|
@ pit
|
@ cle
|
@ ten
|
no
|
@ car
|
pit
|
bye
|
cin
|
oak
|
@ atl
|
@ kc
|
tb
|
@ lac
|
cle
|
|
|
| |
Hayden Hurst 2020 Outlook
The Falcons lost a tight end and gained a tight end. While Matt Ryan hated to see Austin Hooper go, he welcomed the arrival of Hurst. Hurst, a 2018 first-round pick, has made 43 receptions for 512 yards with three touchdowns the past two seasons. "I'm excited about the addition of Hayden to our roster and look forward to getting to work with him, whenever things settle down and get back to normal," Ryan said shortly after the signing. Since then, Hurst has made the trip from his home in Jacksonville to Atlanta in order to work out with and catch passes from Ryan while the Falcons hold their remote off-season program. Also working in Hurst's favor, Falcons OC Dirk Koetter's long history of heavy tight end usage. Koetter's offenses have ranged between an 18 percent and 21 percent target range for TEs over his past five seasons as a coach/OC (Hooper saw 97 targets for the Falcons last season). As ESPN's Mike Clay notes, this suggests a fairly high floor for Hurst, who was only targeted 62 times as a Raven. Although his ADP is rising, Hurst remains a great value pick with upside at the position.
Hayden Hurst 2019 Outlook
Hurst was taken in the first round of the 2018 NFL Draft and had to overcome a broken foot at the start of the season which kept his professional debut from happening until Week 5. In the following 12 games, he caught 13 passes for 163 yards and a touchdown. "For me, I think it was just average," Hurst said, adding he's fully healthy. "I give myself a C. I think I'm capable of a lot more. But the foot thing kind of held me back." Indeed, Hurst was limited to a smaller role after the coaches benched QB Joe Flacco and put dual-threat passer and fellow rookie Lamar Jackson at the helm. The Ravens threw less with Jackson but went 6-1 with him starting, enough to reach the playoffs. Now Flacco is off to Denver, and Hurst will be working in a different kind of NFL attack. Hurst's chances of improving on his 2018 season should be helped by his continued improvement on the health front although fellow second-year man Mark Andrews appears to be ahead of him heading into camp. Still, draft capital is a thing, and the Ravens have a vested interest in making their first-rounder relevant. There is also the team’s history of extensively using multiple tight ends to consider.
Hayden Hurst 2018 Outlook
The Ravens traded down twice in the first round but still grabbed Hurst, who is expected to start immediately. Quarterback Joe Flacco loves to throw to his tight ends so it's imperative that Hurst looks to develop a rapport with his new QB. While Hurst did not put up big numbers at South Carolina, he can create mismatches with linebackers and will help Baltimore move the chains. The Ravens have overhauled their passing attack heading into 2018, and Hurst could end up being a big part of the movement. Even if he's not an immediate starter, Hurst should push the likes of Nick Boyle, Maxx Williams and Vince Mayle for targets as a rookie. While NFL.com doesn't expect Hurst to be this year's Evan Engram, they do think he can become a viable red-zone option for Flacco. That said, you'll want to watch how training camp plays out before investing any capital on him in re-draft leagues.
| | |
