2018 Stats | NYG | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
90% |
88% |
21% |
- |
- |
- |
81% |
89% |
- |
61% |
32% |
- |
- |
52% |
69% |
65% |
- |
66% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
26
|
0
|
36 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
3 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
18
|
67
|
19
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16
|
25
|
-
|
46
|
66
|
-
|
-
|
77
|
75
|
87
|
81
|
577 |
Tar/Rec |
5/2 |
7/7 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
- |
4/2 |
9/5 |
- |
5/4 |
2/2 |
- |
- |
5/3 |
12/8 |
6/6 |
8/5 |
64/45 |
TM Tar% |
14% |
16% |
3% |
- |
- |
- |
11% |
20% |
- |
17% |
11% |
- |
- |
19% |
28% |
19% |
- |
17% |
recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3 |
FScore |
1 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
11 |
14 |
79 |
FS/PPR |
3 |
19 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
17 |
19 |
124 |
Opp |
jac
|
@ dal
|
@ hou
|
no
|
@ car
|
phi
|
@ atl
|
was
|
bye
|
@ sf
|
tb
|
@ phi
|
chi
|
@ was
|
ten
|
@ ind
|
dal
|
|
|
|
2017 Stats | NYG | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
86% |
77% |
83% |
84% |
81% |
70% |
80% |
- |
85% |
79% |
84% |
84% |
85% |
79% |
84% |
18% |
- |
77% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
0
|
-
|
14 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
1 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0 |
recYds |
44
|
49
|
45
|
62
|
0
|
82
|
60
|
-
|
70
|
31
|
9
|
18
|
99
|
54
|
87
|
12
|
-
|
722 |
Tar/Rec |
5/4 |
7/4 |
7/5 |
11/6 |
4/0 |
7/5 |
12/6 |
- |
10/4 |
9/6 |
6/1 |
7/3 |
8/7 |
7/4 |
13/8 |
2/1 |
- |
115/64 |
TM Tar% |
13% |
22% |
15% |
22% |
11% |
37% |
32% |
- |
26% |
24% |
17% |
27% |
24% |
15% |
23% |
5% |
- |
20% |
recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
6 |
FScore |
4 |
10 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
14 |
12 |
0 |
13 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
109 |
FS/PPR |
8 |
14 |
9 |
12 |
0 |
19 |
18 |
0 |
17 |
15 |
1 |
4 |
22 |
9 |
18 |
2 |
0 |
173 |
Opp |
@ dal
|
det
|
@ phi
|
@ tb
|
lac
|
@ den
|
sea
|
bye
|
lar
|
@ sf
|
kc
|
@ was
|
@ oak
|
dal
|
phi
|
@ ari
|
was
|
|
|
|
Evan Engram 2018 Outlook
As New York Newsday recently noted, Engram spent most of last year as the most viable and productive offensive weapon the Giants had. It was sometimes a burden for the rookie tight end. This year, he's looking forward to sharing that workload. That's why he's excited for the addition of Saquon Barkley, the running back who, like Engram, comes in as the team’s first-round pick. The popular sentiment around the Giants and the NFL is that Barkley’s presence will help every aspect of the team's game. Engram thinks his position is near the top of that "what can Saquon do for you?" list. Having Odell Beckham and a healthier receiving corps seem likely after a disastrous (in terms of injuries and attrition) 2017 season. The better news? Engram was everything the Giants thought he might be and then some. He recorded at least one reception in his last 10 games played and had a midseason streak of four straight games with a touchdown. He also handled a generous 22 percent target share when healthy last season, and ESPN.com's Mike Clay points out the team's new coaching staff has a track record that suggests he will receive heavy volume once again in 2018.
Evan Engram 2017 Outlook
Make no mistake about it: Engram's speed -- he ran a 4.42-second 40-yard dash at the NFL Scouting Combine in March -- is a big reason the Giants used the 23rd pick in the draft to land him. Engram's ability to attack the deep middle is expected to add another dimension to the Giants' offense. HC Ben McAdoo, who acknowledged Engram's presence should mean the offense goes more "multiple," hopes and believes -- despite Engram's own admission that he is more of a receiver -- that the Giants will still be able to run the ball with Engram on the field as a lone tight end instead of free-agent blocking specialist Rhett Ellison. Blocking prowess aside, there's no doubt what Engram brings as a receiver. As NFL.com's Bucky Brooks wrote, "It's uncommon for a tight end to be viewed as the missing piece to a championship puzzle, but Engram is the dynamic offensive weapon the Giants have desperately needed to make another run at a Lombardi Trophy." Working in tandem with wideouts Odell Beckham, Brandon Marshall and Sterling Shepard, Engram's presence will absolutely afford McAdoo ample opportunities to create mismatches. It will be on Eli Manning to take advantage of them.
| |