2022 Stats | JAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
71% |
69% |
76% |
74% |
75% |
78% |
85% |
93% |
55% |
88% |
- |
81% |
77% |
79% |
86% |
75% |
67% |
88% |
77% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
0
|
13 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
28
|
46
|
9
|
16
|
69
|
40
|
67
|
55
|
8
|
14
|
-
|
4
|
30
|
162
|
62
|
113
|
16
|
27
|
766 |
Tar/Rec |
4/4 |
8/7 |
3/1 |
1/1 |
10/6 |
6/5 |
7/4 |
6/4 |
2/1 |
4/3 |
- |
1/1 |
7/5 |
15/11 |
10/8 |
8/7 |
2/1 |
4/4 |
98/73 |
TM Tar% |
11% |
28% |
8% |
7% |
23% |
29% |
17% |
24% |
7% |
11% |
- |
3% |
23% |
38% |
26% |
28% |
8% |
8% |
18% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
FScore |
2 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
28 |
6 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
101 |
FS/PPR |
6 |
11 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
9 |
10 |
15 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
39 |
14 |
18 |
3 |
6 |
174 |
Opp |
@ was
|
ind
|
@ lac
|
@ phi
|
hou
|
@ ind
|
nyg
|
den
|
lvr
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
bal
|
@ det
|
@ ten
|
dal
|
@ nyj
|
@ hou
|
ten
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | NYG | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
56% |
68% |
74% |
73% |
61% |
78% |
82% |
- |
90% |
90% |
82% |
74% |
87% |
78% |
64% |
63% |
74% |
rshYds |
-
|
-
|
0
|
-3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-3 |
rushes |
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
rshTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
-
|
-
|
21
|
27
|
55
|
24
|
44
|
15
|
38
|
-
|
12
|
37
|
61
|
8
|
33
|
17
|
12
|
4
|
408 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
6/2 |
6/5 |
4/4 |
5/3 |
8/6 |
4/3 |
3/3 |
- |
5/2 |
6/3 |
5/4 |
4/1 |
5/4 |
5/4 |
2/1 |
5/1 |
73/46 |
TM Tar% |
- |
- |
17% |
17% |
13% |
11% |
26% |
13% |
19% |
- |
15% |
21% |
14% |
14% |
15% |
13% |
29% |
29% |
16% |
recTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
FScore |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
58 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
4 |
7 |
9 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
10 |
1 |
7 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
104 |
Opp |
@ hou
|
den
|
ari
|
@ cin
|
ten
|
mia
|
bye
|
@ sea
|
buf
|
@ ind
|
sf
|
atl
|
@ lar
|
@ ten
|
hou
|
@ nyj
|
@ ne
|
ind
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | NYG | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
94% |
97% |
85% |
84% |
81% |
81% |
83% |
82% |
75% |
69% |
- |
96% |
71% |
86% |
80% |
78% |
76% |
83% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
0
|
3
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
26 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
6 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
recYds |
9
|
65
|
22
|
35
|
16
|
30
|
46
|
61
|
48
|
15
|
-
|
129
|
32
|
18
|
46
|
65
|
17
|
654 |
Tar/Rec |
7/2 |
8/6 |
5/3 |
10/6 |
2/1 |
3/2 |
9/6 |
10/5 |
10/5 |
3/2 |
- |
9/6 |
8/4 |
4/2 |
7/4 |
10/7 |
4/2 |
109/63 |
TM Tar% |
18% |
24% |
16% |
28% |
7% |
17% |
31% |
24% |
30% |
11% |
- |
26% |
36% |
17% |
23% |
26% |
16% |
22% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
FScore |
0 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
79 |
FS/PPR |
2 |
12 |
5 |
9 |
9 |
5 |
10 |
12 |
15 |
3 |
0 |
18 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
14 |
3 |
142 |
Opp |
pit
|
@ chi
|
sf
|
@ lar
|
@ dal
|
was
|
@ phi
|
tb
|
@ was
|
phi
|
bye
|
@ cin
|
@ sea
|
ari
|
cle
|
@ bal
|
dal
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | NYG | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
recYds |
116
|
48
|
113
|
54
|
42
|
-
|
6
|
40
|
48
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
467 |
Tar/Rec |
14/11 |
8/6 |
8/6 |
7/4 |
11/6 |
- |
5/1 |
7/4 |
8/6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
68/44 |
recTDs |
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3 |
FScore |
17 |
4 |
17 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
65 |
FS/PPR |
28 |
10 |
23 |
9 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
Opp |
pit
|
@ chi
|
sf
|
@ lar
|
@ dal
|
was
|
@ phi
|
tb
|
@ was
|
phi
|
bye
|
@ cin
|
@ sea
|
ari
|
cle
|
@ bal
|
dal
|
|
|
|
Evan Engram 2022 Outlook
The Jaguars were busy early in free agency and one of the first players they went after was Engram. A 2017 first-round pick by the Giants, Engram and he signed a one-year, $9 million deal to join wide receivers Christian Kirk and Zay Jones as new additions to the passing game in Jacksonville. Speaking in April, incoming offensive coordinator Press Taylor shared how he envisions using Engram and the focus was on the "ability to create matchups" that stress opposing defenses. "When we put Engram on the field, who's going to cover him?" Taylor said. "Do you need to bring in a lighter body? Do you put a nickel on him? Do you put a safety on him? Do you put a linebacker on him, which we would ask for if you had to pick? Evan kinda brings that with his speed overall." Engram has been a matchup nightmare in theory throughout his NFL career, but his five years with the Giants never quite saw him take advantage of that on the field. If he can put it all together with the Jags, he'll likely score more than a one-year deal next offseason. Beyond that, from a fantasy perspective, Engram will join the ranks of viable TE2s and streaming options at the position. Fantasy managers looking to invest shouldn't go overboard.
Evan Engram 2021 Outlook
The Giants could have saved $6 million by trading or releasing Engram, but coach Joe Judge speaks as if the tight end isn't going anywhere anytime soon. "I love Evan. I have total confidence in Evan," Judge said. "He gives everyone in our locker room confidence. He goes out there every day, and this guy works tirelessly. I mean, tirelessly. ..." If you're looking for a tight end who could provide value, look no further. Engram, 26, made his first Pro Bowl in 2020 after making 63 catches for 654 yards and a touchdown. He also had 11 drops and six passes thrown his way were intercepted, according to Pro Football Focus. The Giants, though, weren’t ready to give up on a player they used a first-round choice on in 2017. "He's a guy that obviously we have to keep featuring in the offense," Judge said, "along with all the other tight ends in our program. We have to make sure we keep doing things to use their versatility." Yes, they added Kyle Rudolph to work behind Engram and added Kenny Golladay and rookie Kadarius Toney to the receiving corps. But the Giants need all the weapons they can get after ranking 31st in total offense, including 29th in passing. They also were 31st in points.
Evan Engram 2020 Outlook
As ESPN noted, Engram is entering his fourth NFL season and has missed 14 of 48 possible games due to injury, including five games in 2018 and eight last season. The injuries have held Engram without a top-12 fantasy campaign since 2017, but there's no doubt he's been a significant force when healthy. His speed and explosiveness, combined with his height and catching ability, have made him a mismatch for defenders. Whether he can retain that explosiveness with his surgically-repaired foot will determine if that potential fantasy value will still be there moving forward. Remember, the Giants did pick up the fifth-year option on Engram’s contract this offseason, which is a good indication of what they think his offensive contributions will be. Engram was one of six players who appeared in at least eight games and were targeted at least six times during 100 percent of those outings last season. As a result, he finished as a top-10 tight end in five of his eight games, and he ranked outside of the top-15 just twice. That consistent usage should mean continued high-end production. Again, talent has never been the question with Engram; he needs to avoid injuries to re-emerge as a high No. 1 tight end for fantasy managers.
| | | |