2020 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
86% |
- |
- |
86% |
rshYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
88
|
-
|
-
|
88 |
rushes |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
9 |
rshTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
pasYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
226
|
-
|
-
|
226 |
pasTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
INTs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
Opp |
@ car
|
no
|
@ ne
|
buf
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
tb
|
@ cle
|
@ lac
|
den
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
@ nyj
|
ind
|
lac
|
mia
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | TEN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
rshYds |
24
|
32
|
34
|
22
|
13
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
129 |
rushes |
3
|
5
|
6
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
24 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0 |
pasYds |
248
|
154
|
304
|
227
|
183
|
63
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
24
|
1203 |
pasTDs |
3
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
7 |
INTs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
2 |
FScore |
26 |
14 |
18 |
25 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
99 |
Opp |
@ car
|
no
|
@ ne
|
buf
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
tb
|
@ cle
|
@ lac
|
den
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
@ nyj
|
ind
|
lac
|
mia
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
2018 Stats | TEN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
52% |
- |
85% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
- |
100% |
100% |
56% |
100% |
99% |
100% |
96% |
48% |
- |
88% |
rshYds |
15
|
-
|
51
|
46
|
10
|
25
|
38
|
-
|
32
|
21
|
17
|
28
|
43
|
13
|
11
|
7
|
-
|
357 |
rushes |
3
|
-
|
7
|
10
|
2
|
2
|
7
|
-
|
10
|
2
|
4
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
64 |
rshTDs |
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
2 |
recYds |
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
21 |
Tar/Rec |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
1/1 |
TM Tar% |
0% |
- |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
- |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
- |
0% |
recTDs |
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0 |
pasYds |
103
|
-
|
100
|
344
|
129
|
117
|
237
|
-
|
240
|
228
|
85
|
303
|
282
|
162
|
88
|
110
|
-
|
2528 |
pasTDs |
0
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
11 |
INTs |
2
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
8 |
FScore |
4 |
0 |
10 |
34 |
6 |
8 |
18 |
0 |
29 |
23 |
4 |
25 |
25 |
8 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
212 |
Opp |
@ mia
|
hou
|
@ jac
|
phi
|
@ buf
|
bal
|
@ lac
|
bye
|
@ dal
|
ne
|
@ ind
|
@ hou
|
nyj
|
jac
|
@ nyg
|
was
|
ind
|
|
|
|
Marcus Mariota 2020 Outlook
Mariota's deal with the Raiders has some interesting incentives that could make him a pretty penny -- if things take a drastic turn under center. Mariota signed a two-year, $17.6 million deal that includes a first-year $7.5 million fully guaranteed base salary. The initial details of his contract aren’t all that intriguing, but the incentives and escalators could potentially pay Mariota as much as $37.5 million. Of course, Mariota would have to take the field in order to earn them, but it's a fair indication of what the Raiders think the quarterback could do if he's pressed into action. There are also reasons to believe incumbent starter Derek Carr is the superior player and should hold on to the gig, but GM Mike Mayock and HC Jon Gruden outbid a competitive group of suitors for Mariota because they were intrigued. We saw flashes of Mariota's dynamic playmaking ability last season, but some of his issues, such as holding the ball too long and staring down receivers, are signs that he still needs further development. Whatever the case, Gruden has done wonders with far less talented reclamation projects at the position before, so it's a nice landing spot for Mariota's second act.
Marcus Mariota 2019 Outlook
The Titans didn't promote Arthur Smith to replace Matt LaFleur as OC because he was the "easy" hire, an in-house coach they knew well. HC Mike Vrabel said Smith became the logical choice because he was qualified and respected, and a perfect man for the job. While the change of coordinator will give Mariota his fifth play-caller heading into his fifth NFL season, not having to learn a completely new playbook or new terminology this time will be a plus. ... Meanwhile, Mariota reported for off-season workouts almost 10 pounds heavier than he was last season. Vrabel was asked about that decision and he recounted his experiences facing bigger quarterbacks like John Elway and Dan Marino during his playing career when explaining that he's on board with Mariota's decision. "I just want to make sure he's doing everything he can to stay healthy, stay durable and help us on the field," Vrabel said. Staying healthy has certainly been a problem for Mariota throughout his career, and a nerve issue in his right elbow was a major problem last season. That alone keeps Mariota out of the fantasy QB1 discussion. It doesn't, however, keep him from being a low-priced, low-end QB2, if you're so inclined.
| | |