| 2018 Stats | NYJ | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
40% |
48% |
46% |
36% |
40% |
41% |
46% |
46% |
35% |
34% |
- |
41% |
63% |
9% |
- |
- |
- |
41% |
rshYds |
102
|
35
|
34
|
0
|
219
|
40
|
29
|
25
|
49
|
19
|
-
|
30
|
98
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
685 |
rushes |
10
|
12
|
16
|
4
|
15
|
13
|
11
|
13
|
13
|
7
|
-
|
6
|
21
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
143 |
| rshTDs |
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6 |
| recYds |
0
|
4
|
17
|
3
|
12
|
12
|
21
|
13
|
11
|
18
|
-
|
30
|
9
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
152 |
| Tar/Rec |
0/0 |
3/2 |
3/2 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
2/2 |
3/1 |
1/1 |
2/1 |
2/2 |
- |
4/3 |
5/4 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
- |
28/21 |
| TM Tar% |
0% |
7% |
10% |
3% |
6% |
7% |
8% |
4% |
6% |
6% |
- |
10% |
17% |
4% |
- |
- |
- |
7% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
| FScore |
22 |
3 |
17 |
0 |
29 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
119 |
| FS/PPR |
22 |
5 |
19 |
1 |
30 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
0 |
9 |
14 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
140 |
| Opp |
@ det
|
mia
|
@ cle
|
@ jac
|
den
|
ind
|
min
|
@ chi
|
@ mia
|
buf
|
bye
|
ne
|
@ ten
|
@ buf
|
hou
|
gb
|
@ ne
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
79% |
45% |
53% |
34% |
47% |
48% |
53% |
56% |
- |
44% |
44% |
46% |
51% |
62% |
34% |
53% |
- |
50% |
rshYds |
33
|
37
|
44
|
20
|
60
|
58
|
35
|
64
|
-
|
90
|
18
|
95
|
41
|
121
|
72
|
44
|
21
|
853 |
rushes |
17
|
10
|
12
|
7
|
16
|
12
|
17
|
11
|
-
|
16
|
11
|
16
|
10
|
19
|
5
|
12
|
15
|
206 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
| recYds |
33
|
0
|
10
|
7
|
7
|
15
|
36
|
54
|
-
|
5
|
0
|
10
|
3
|
10
|
-7
|
-1
|
0
|
182 |
| Tar/Rec |
2/2 |
1/0 |
3/2 |
2/1 |
3/2 |
2/2 |
6/4 |
6/4 |
- |
2/1 |
0/0 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
5/4 |
4/1 |
0/0 |
42/28 |
| TM Tar% |
7% |
2% |
7% |
5% |
8% |
6% |
16% |
18% |
- |
5% |
0% |
7% |
3% |
11% |
14% |
11% |
- |
8% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| FScore |
6 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
17 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
10 |
4 |
13 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
115 |
| FS/PPR |
8 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
9 |
11 |
21 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
11 |
5 |
16 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
143 |
| Opp |
pit
|
@ bal
|
@ ind
|
cin
|
nyj
|
@ hou
|
ten
|
min
|
bye
|
@ det
|
jac
|
@ cin
|
@ lac
|
gb
|
bal
|
@ chi
|
@ pit
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
58% |
52% |
51% |
47% |
59% |
57% |
59% |
57% |
50% |
60% |
53% |
53% |
- |
56% |
50% |
54% |
67% |
55% |
rshYds |
62
|
133
|
79
|
120
|
22
|
16
|
63
|
29
|
4
|
23
|
10
|
44
|
-
|
113
|
28
|
54
|
152
|
952 |
rushes |
12
|
18
|
15
|
16
|
13
|
9
|
12
|
11
|
6
|
9
|
8
|
16
|
-
|
10
|
8
|
16
|
19
|
198 |
| rshTDs |
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
7 |
| recYds |
16
|
15
|
0
|
22
|
18
|
20
|
16
|
34
|
63
|
30
|
13
|
47
|
-
|
5
|
0
|
4
|
16
|
319 |
| Tar/Rec |
2/2 |
1/1 |
1/0 |
4/3 |
3/1 |
2/2 |
4/3 |
2/2 |
4/4 |
5/3 |
5/5 |
7/6 |
- |
2/1 |
2/0 |
5/4 |
4/3 |
53/40 |
| TM Tar% |
8% |
3% |
3% |
11% |
9% |
5% |
13% |
4% |
15% |
16% |
13% |
17% |
- |
7% |
8% |
19% |
11% |
10% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| FScore |
13 |
20 |
7 |
20 |
4 |
3 |
13 |
12 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
17 |
16 |
169 |
| FS/PPR |
15 |
21 |
7 |
23 |
5 |
5 |
16 |
14 |
10 |
8 |
7 |
15 |
0 |
12 |
2 |
21 |
19 |
209 |
| Opp |
@ phi
|
bal
|
@ mia
|
@ was
|
ne
|
@ ten
|
@ cin
|
nyj
|
dal
|
@ bal
|
pit
|
nyg
|
bye
|
cin
|
@ buf
|
sd
|
@ pit
|
|
|
| |
| 2015 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| rshYds |
20
|
72
|
36
|
63
|
49
|
32
|
9
|
14
|
38
|
-5
|
-
|
7
|
62
|
145
|
23
|
88
|
53
|
706 |
rushes |
12
|
15
|
10
|
12
|
13
|
11
|
8
|
10
|
10
|
6
|
-
|
7
|
11
|
20
|
9
|
16
|
15
|
185 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
4 |
| recYds |
13
|
0
|
0
|
62
|
38
|
9
|
0
|
12
|
26
|
4
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
9
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
182 |
| Tar/Rec |
2/2 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
3/3 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
2/1 |
4/3 |
2/1 |
- |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
22/19 |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
3 |
13 |
3 |
12 |
14 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
27 |
3 |
14 |
5 |
118 |
| FS/PPR |
5 |
13 |
3 |
15 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
28 |
6 |
14 |
5 |
137 |
| Opp |
@ nyj
|
ten
|
oak
|
@ sd
|
@ bal
|
den
|
@ StL
|
ari
|
@ cin
|
@ pit
|
bye
|
bal
|
cin
|
sf
|
@ sea
|
@ kc
|
pit
|
|
|
| |
Isaiah Crowell 2018 Outlook
Crowell agreed to a three year deal with the Jets this March, which seems to be an ideal situation for the versatile power back. Matt Forte, the Jets' second-leading rusher in 2017, has retired. Their leading rusher, Bilal Powell, turns 30 in October. For his part, Crowell has led Cleveland's rushing attack over his four-year career, accumulating 737 carries for 3,118 yards and 21 touchdowns, while catching 96 passes for 770 yards and one touchdown. According to ESPN's Mike Clay, only 20 backs have seen more targets during the span, and new teammate Bilal Powell -- often viewed as a standout pass-catcher -- has seen only 13 more targets than Crowell the past two seasons. As Bleacher Report noted, Crowell runs powerfully with a low pad level that enables him to keep balance through contact and fight for extra yards. He has the frame to withstand a heavier workload than he's had during his years in Cleveland, and with more carries he could wear down defenses late in games. Whichever QB earns the starting nod in New York, the Jets would like nothing better than Crowell providing them with a solid, early-down hammer capable of keeping the offense on schedule.
Isaiah Crowell 2017 Outlook
If Crowell produces this year the way RBs coach Kirby Wilson believes he can, the powerful running back should receive the lucrative, long-term contract he seeks. "He [only] scratched the surface," Wilson said of last season, when Crowell rushed 198 times for a career-high 952 yards (4.8 average) and seven touchdowns to go along with 40 catches for 319 yards last season. Crowell, 24, signed his restricted free-agent tender May 10 and is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent in March. The running game will be vital for the Browns this year, especially because they have yet to find stability at quarterback. "The best friend a quarterback has is an established running game,” Wilson said. “You help the entire football team. You help the defense. It’s such a significant part.” Crowell, an undrafted free agent in 2014, came just 48 yards shy of his first 1,000-yard season, and would've achieved the milestone easily had the Browns not fallen behind so much which forced the team to scrap the run. In six games, Crowell had 10 carries or fewer. He'll continue to lose some snaps to Duke Johnson on passing downs, but until the team's QB situation improves, Crowell remains the Browns' most reliable offensive weapon.
Isaiah Crowell 2016 Outlook
According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, new HC Hue Jackson believes Crowell will have a "sensational" 2016 season. "I've been getting so much mail or phone calls with people saying, 'Well, wait a minute, why don't you guys have a running back?'" Jackson said. "I really think Isaiah Crowell is a really good running back. I think he's going to have a sensational season, I really do." The Browns are apparently confident that Crowell and Duke Johnson will form an effective duo, as the team surprisingly opted not to select any running backs in the 2016 NFL Draft. Johnson impressed as a pass-catcher last season, but as CBSSports.com suggested, there's nothing from Crowell's first two years in the league to suggest that he's anything more than a low-end starter…if that. Nevertheless, he's the favorite to serve as Cleveland's featured runner, with Johnson likely slated for a third-down and chance-of-pace role. It is possible the team could let its two running backs compete for the starting job.
| | | |
