| 2021 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
59% |
75% |
57% |
30% |
72% |
65% |
74% |
62% |
68% |
58% |
74% |
61% |
58% |
- |
79% |
3% |
37% |
56% |
58% |
| recYds |
21
|
64
|
10
|
24
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
1
|
31
|
30
|
81
|
13
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
302 |
| Tar/Rec |
4/3 |
8/5 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
2/2 |
2/1 |
5/3 |
5/3 |
7/6 |
1/1 |
- |
1/1 |
- |
- |
2/1 |
41/29 |
| TM Tar% |
12% |
24% |
6% |
3% |
3% |
0% |
0% |
5% |
7% |
15% |
28% |
16% |
5% |
- |
9% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
8% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
3 |
| FScore |
2 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
14 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
48 |
| FS/PPR |
5 |
11 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
20 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
77 |
| Opp |
sea
|
lar
|
@ ten
|
@ mia
|
@ bal
|
hou
|
@ sf
|
ten
|
nyj
|
jac
|
@ buf
|
tb
|
@ hou
|
bye
|
ne
|
@ ari
|
lvr
|
@ jac
|
|
|
| |
| 2020 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
73% |
- |
53% |
62% |
61% |
62% |
- |
58% |
32% |
- |
54% |
30% |
55% |
69% |
76% |
55% |
64% |
57% |
| recYds |
49
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
-
|
29
|
-
|
18
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
-
|
12
|
44
|
14
|
50
|
17
|
251 |
| Tar/Rec |
4/3 |
- |
- |
1/1 |
- |
3/3 |
- |
3/2 |
- |
- |
2/1 |
- |
1/1 |
3/3 |
2/2 |
6/4 |
3/3 |
28/23 |
| TM Tar% |
9% |
- |
0% |
4% |
0% |
7% |
- |
9% |
0% |
- |
6% |
0% |
3% |
12% |
7% |
17% |
12% |
6% |
| recTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
| FScore |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
43 |
| FS/PPR |
7 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
4 |
66 |
| Opp |
@ jac
|
min
|
nyj
|
@ chi
|
@ cle
|
cin
|
bye
|
@ det
|
bal
|
@ ten
|
gb
|
ten
|
@ hou
|
@ lvr
|
hou
|
@ pit
|
jac
|
|
|
| |
| 2019 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| recYds |
20
|
21
|
46
|
22
|
19
|
-
|
21
|
61
|
22
|
44
|
-
|
28
|
73
|
27
|
21
|
17
|
6
|
448 |
| Tar/Rec |
2/1 |
3/2 |
4/4 |
8/4 |
3/3 |
- |
5/3 |
5/4 |
4/3 |
4/3 |
- |
4/3 |
11/6 |
6/2 |
5/2 |
4/2 |
4/1 |
72/43 |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
| FScore |
2 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
68 |
| FS/PPR |
3 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
11 |
13 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
111 |
| Opp |
@ jac
|
min
|
nyj
|
@ chi
|
@ cle
|
cin
|
bye
|
@ det
|
bal
|
@ ten
|
gb
|
ten
|
@ hou
|
@ lvr
|
hou
|
@ pit
|
jac
|
|
|
| |
Jack Doyle 2020 Outlook
Sure, the Colts brought another once-promising-but-since-failed in to work alongside Doyle again this offseason. While it worked out well enough for Eric Ebron in 2018, expecting Trey Burton to command a similar role in 2020 seems like a reach. But even if Burton is better than expected (as Ebron was in 2018), Doyle is still well-positioned to provide solid value in PPR leagues. As CBSSports.com notes, the Colts have been one of the most TE-heavy passing attacks in the NFL since Frank Reich got there. ESPN's Mike Clay took that a step further, pointing out that Reich's tight ends have enjoyed target shares of 23 percent, 24 percent, 31 percent, 29 percent, 27 percent and 29 percent during his six seasons as a head coach/OC (three different teams). Doyle, for what it's worth, tied for the team lead with 31 targets (20 percent share) once Ebron went on injured reserve after Week 12 last season. So even if Burton makes a significant contribution, Doyle is the steadier component in this offense. Adding to the intrigue, going from Jacoby Brissett to Philip Rivers is an upgrade for Doyle, who is locked in as a viable fantasy TE2 and/or streamable play who also carries upside potential in PPR formats.
| | |
