| 2019 Stats | HOU | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
99% |
94% |
97% |
97% |
97% |
98% |
100% |
96% |
100% |
- |
93% |
100% |
84% |
100% |
100% |
98% |
- |
97% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
18 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
2 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0 |
| recYds |
111
|
40
|
67
|
41
|
88
|
55
|
106
|
109
|
48
|
-
|
80
|
94
|
64
|
120
|
119
|
23
|
-
|
1165 |
| Tar/Rec |
13/8 |
8/5 |
7/6 |
8/5 |
8/7 |
12/9 |
12/9 |
13/11 |
11/8 |
- |
12/7 |
8/6 |
8/5 |
13/7 |
8/6 |
9/5 |
- |
150/104 |
| TM Tar% |
46% |
28% |
21% |
25% |
24% |
29% |
36% |
34% |
41% |
- |
40% |
29% |
32% |
28% |
32% |
30% |
- |
31% |
| recTDs |
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
7 |
| FScore |
23 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
8 |
5 |
16 |
10 |
11 |
0 |
8 |
21 |
10 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
163 |
| FS/PPR |
31 |
9 |
12 |
8 |
15 |
14 |
25 |
21 |
19 |
0 |
15 |
27 |
15 |
26 |
17 |
7 |
0 |
267 |
| Opp |
@ no
|
jac
|
@ lac
|
car
|
atl
|
@ kc
|
@ ind
|
oak
|
@ jac
|
bye
|
@ bal
|
ind
|
ne
|
den
|
@ ten
|
@ tb
|
ten
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | HOU | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
99% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
97% |
98% |
- |
100% |
98% |
99% |
100% |
96% |
100% |
97% |
99% |
rshYds |
-7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-7 |
rushes |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| recYds |
78
|
110
|
86
|
169
|
151
|
63
|
50
|
82
|
105
|
-
|
56
|
74
|
91
|
36
|
170
|
104
|
147
|
1572 |
| Tar/Rec |
11/8 |
11/6 |
10/6 |
12/10 |
13/9 |
6/5 |
8/3 |
7/6 |
12/10 |
- |
6/5 |
6/5 |
12/7 |
10/4 |
11/10 |
12/9 |
16/12 |
163/115 |
| TM Tar% |
34% |
39% |
26% |
30% |
30% |
29% |
35% |
35% |
60% |
- |
26% |
26% |
41% |
29% |
42% |
31% |
48% |
34% |
| recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
11 |
| FScore |
7 |
17 |
8 |
22 |
15 |
12 |
11 |
20 |
16 |
0 |
11 |
7 |
9 |
9 |
29 |
10 |
14 |
222 |
| FS/PPR |
15 |
23 |
14 |
32 |
24 |
17 |
14 |
26 |
26 |
0 |
16 |
12 |
16 |
13 |
39 |
19 |
26 |
337 |
| Opp |
@ ne
|
@ ten
|
nyg
|
@ ind
|
dal
|
buf
|
@ jac
|
mia
|
@ den
|
bye
|
@ was
|
ten
|
cle
|
ind
|
@ nyj
|
@ phi
|
jac
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | HOU | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
100% |
100% |
100% |
93% |
100% |
95% |
- |
100% |
100% |
99% |
93% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
92% |
100% |
- |
98% |
| recYds |
55
|
73
|
76
|
107
|
52
|
19
|
-
|
224
|
86
|
111
|
76
|
125
|
80
|
149
|
80
|
65
|
-
|
1378 |
| Tar/Rec |
16/7 |
13/7 |
8/7 |
12/10 |
12/4 |
4/2 |
- |
11/8 |
16/6 |
14/7 |
9/4 |
10/7 |
14/8 |
16/11 |
13/4 |
6/4 |
- |
174/96 |
| TM Tar% |
40% |
54% |
24% |
35% |
41% |
14% |
- |
37% |
36% |
40% |
28% |
27% |
29% |
43% |
45% |
38% |
- |
35% |
| recTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
13 |
| FScore |
11 |
7 |
7 |
16 |
23 |
7 |
0 |
28 |
14 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
8 |
26 |
14 |
12 |
0 |
215 |
| FS/PPR |
18 |
14 |
14 |
26 |
27 |
9 |
0 |
36 |
20 |
18 |
17 |
19 |
16 |
37 |
18 |
16 |
0 |
311 |
| Opp |
jac
|
@ cin
|
@ ne
|
ten
|
kc
|
cle
|
bye
|
@ sea
|
ind
|
@ lar
|
ari
|
@ bal
|
@ ten
|
sf
|
@ jac
|
pit
|
@ ind
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | HOU | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
97% |
100% |
97% |
- |
100% |
99% |
100% |
99% |
- |
97% |
97% |
97% |
100% |
99% |
98% |
100% |
74% |
97% |
| recYds |
54
|
113
|
56
|
4
|
56
|
71
|
36
|
44
|
-
|
48
|
58
|
70
|
58
|
33
|
87
|
43
|
123
|
954 |
| Tar/Rec |
8/5 |
11/7 |
8/4 |
6/1 |
9/5 |
15/9 |
12/5 |
7/4 |
- |
13/5 |
6/5 |
10/5 |
8/3 |
4/2 |
17/8 |
6/3 |
11/7 |
151/78 |
| TM Tar% |
23% |
33% |
20% |
- |
21% |
38% |
29% |
24% |
- |
48% |
16% |
29% |
23% |
17% |
39% |
22% |
24% |
27% |
| recTDs |
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
| FScore |
11 |
17 |
5 |
0 |
11 |
7 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
11 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
12 |
119 |
| FS/PPR |
16 |
24 |
9 |
1 |
16 |
16 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
9 |
10 |
12 |
14 |
5 |
16 |
7 |
19 |
197 |
| Opp |
chi
|
kc
|
@ ne
|
ten
|
@ min
|
ind
|
@ den
|
det
|
bye
|
@ jac
|
@ oak
|
sd
|
@ gb
|
@ ind
|
jac
|
cin
|
@ ten
|
|
|
| |
DeAndre Hopkins 2019 Outlook
We all get it. Hopkins is good. He's super good. But it's better than that. He has a talented young quarterback in Deshaun Watson and gets a huge percentage of his team's targets. And he makes the most of those targets. Hopkins comes off an impressive 2018 campaign, as he collected his second straight All-Pro selection and tied Andre Johnson's single-season franchise record with 115 catches. Unlike Johnson, Hopkins did it without a single drop. The former 2013 first-round pick's ability to haul in 105 catchable passes without a drop was a Pro Football Focus record (PFF has been keeping grades since the 2006 season). Better still, the overall production has been consistently high-end. Hopkins has only had two seasons in his six years in the NFL where he has not reached over 1,000 receiving yards (a feat achieved without the greatest of quarterbacks until Watson came along). According to PFF, over the 2017 and 2018 seasons Hopkins has a combined 649.3 points in PPR -- the next receiver that is even remotely close is Antonio Brown with 638.2 points. With an improved offensive line and Watson still under center, 2019 should be another elite year for Hopkins.
DeAndre Hopkins 2018 Outlook
Hopkins is one of the best offensive players in the game. He was a first-team Pro Bowler and first-team All-Pro last year, and he led the NFL with 13 touchdowns, catching 96 passes for 1,378 yards after signing an $81 million contract prior to the season. Much like Andre Johnson -- his predecessor in Houston -- Hopkins has produced at a high level despite dealing with subpar quarterback play for nearly his entire time in Houston. We say nearly, because the exception was last season’s seven-game stretch with Deshaun Watson, who had an epic rookie campaign before he injured his knee. So while Hopkins has consistently played better than we all expected, there's reason to believe we haven't seen his ceiling. For the most part, Hopkins has relied on precise route-running, amazing hands and body control. He's also a physically tough and imposing player. As Bleacher Report put it, "He's the type of receiver that demands the ball even when he's covered." Think about his potential over a full season with Watson, who was on pace for 43 touchdown passes before he got hurt. Assuming the belief that Watson's rehab has him on track to open the season as the starter is correct, Hopkins is pushing into a tier created -- and, up to this point, manned exclusively by -- Antonio Brown. Hopkins is still the No. 2 behind Brown, but the gap is closing.
DeAndre Hopkins 2017 Outlook
Although they were abruptly thrown into the huddle together late last season during a win over Jacksonville (when Brock Osweiler was benched), Tom Savage and Hopkins displayed a lot of potential as a passing tandem. Targeted 15 times by Savage, Hopkins caught eight passes for 87 yards during the comeback victory. Those are the moments that Savage and Hopkins hope to replicate this fall. Despite the selection of DeShaun Watson in the first round of April's draft, Savage is the projected starter after Osweiler was traded to Cleveland. Hopkins was named to the Pro Bowl for the first time in 2015 when he caught a career-high 111 passes for 1,521 yards and 11 touchdowns. His production dipped last season to 78 catches for 954 yards and four scores while dealing with erratic passing from Osweiler. Eleven of Osweiler's 19 interceptions, including the playoffs, occurred while throwing in Hopkins' direction. HC Bill O'Brien made it clear at the NFL scouting combine that he doesn't fault Hopkins for the receiver's statistical decline. Fantasy owners should do the same and take advantage of the value that's going to come in the wake of a disappointing season. That discount alone should be sufficient reason to roll with Hopkins this fall.
| | | |
