| 2023 Stats | TEN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
83% |
69% |
81% |
65% |
58% |
73% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
71% |
rshYds |
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6 |
rushes |
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
| rshTDs |
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| recYds |
-
|
35
|
7
|
29
|
33
|
18
|
-
|
23
|
28
|
27
|
6
|
45
|
62
|
46
|
36
|
63
|
34
|
36
|
528 |
| Tar/Rec |
- |
4/4 |
4/3 |
3/3 |
9/5 |
4/2 |
- |
5/4 |
4/3 |
6/3 |
2/1 |
5/4 |
6/3 |
6/5 |
3/3 |
6/6 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
74/54 |
| TM Tar% |
0% |
17% |
17% |
12% |
27% |
20% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
19% |
| recTDs |
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
12 |
3 |
3 |
59 |
| FS/PPR |
0 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
6 |
18 |
6 |
5 |
113 |
| Opp |
@ no
|
lac
|
@ cle
|
cin
|
@ ind
|
bal
|
bye
|
atl
|
@ pit
|
@ tb
|
@ jac
|
car
|
ind
|
@ mia
|
hou
|
sea
|
@ hou
|
jac
|
|
|
| |
| 2022 Stats | TEN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
15% |
29% |
17% |
24% |
20% |
- |
46% |
41% |
35% |
32% |
45% |
33% |
58% |
49% |
60% |
46% |
25% |
43% |
37% |
rshYds |
-4
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
rushes |
1
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| recYds |
11
|
-
|
-
|
38
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
48
|
41
|
31
|
35
|
68
|
45
|
54
|
10
|
24
|
42
|
450 |
| Tar/Rec |
1/1 |
- |
- |
3/3 |
- |
- |
- |
2/1 |
3/1 |
2/1 |
2/1 |
5/3 |
5/4 |
6/6 |
5/4 |
2/1 |
4/3 |
4/3 |
44/32 |
| TM Tar% |
3% |
0% |
0% |
15% |
0% |
- |
0% |
29% |
38% |
6% |
7% |
15% |
20% |
18% |
21% |
10% |
11% |
11% |
10% |
| recTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3 |
| FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
10 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
63 |
| FS/PPR |
1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
16 |
10 |
2 |
5 |
13 |
95 |
| Opp |
nyg
|
@ buf
|
lvr
|
@ ind
|
@ was
|
bye
|
ind
|
@ hou
|
@ kc
|
den
|
@ gb
|
cin
|
@ phi
|
jac
|
@ lac
|
hou
|
dal
|
@ jac
|
|
|
| |
Chigoziem Okonkwo 2023 Outlook
Okonkwo began getting looks in the clutch early in his rookie season and his 32 receptions were one shy of fellow first-year target Treylon Burks (33 receptions in 11 games). But Burks had only one TD -- Okonkwo had three -- and his inability to separate was a setback to his projection as a future No. 1 receiver. Okonkwo should benefit from stability at the quarterback position after the Titans juggled three last season and starter Ryan Tannehill felt the impacts of an ankle issue most of the second half of the campaign. Okonkwo fits well in new offensive coordinator Tim Kelly’s offense. While RB Derrick Henry won’t be ignored, Kelly said the scheme will aggressively dictate tempo and force defenses to cover the entire field, not just in the box. Okonkwo played less than 40 percent of the total offensive snaps, a number that could easily double as a chess piece in Kelly’s system. He ran a 4.52 40 at the Combine out of Maryland and can get vertical off of play-action and misdirection using Henry.
| |
