| 2023 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
8% |
15% |
1% |
10% |
33% |
6% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8% |
rshYds |
2
|
22
|
-
|
15
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
-
|
-2
|
5
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
8
|
69
|
145
|
71
|
112
|
451 |
rushes |
1
|
4
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
-
|
4
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
17
|
22
|
20
|
25
|
104 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| recYds |
5
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
7
|
26
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
16
|
0
|
35
|
9
|
98 |
| Tar/Rec |
1/1 |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
- |
2/2 |
3/3 |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
4/3 |
1/0 |
6/5 |
2/1 |
19/15 |
| TM Tar% |
4% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
7% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| FScore |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
10 |
12 |
60 |
| FS/PPR |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
14 |
15 |
13 |
75 |
| Opp |
@ den
|
@ buf
|
pit
|
@ lac
|
gb
|
ne
|
@ chi
|
@ det
|
nyg
|
nyj
|
@ mia
|
kc
|
bye
|
min
|
lac
|
@ kc
|
@ ind
|
den
|
|
|
| |
| 2022 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
17% |
9% |
38% |
4% |
5% |
- |
9% |
9% |
2% |
3% |
- |
4% |
7% |
5% |
4% |
- |
- |
3% |
6% |
rshYds |
-
|
2
|
-
|
24
|
-7
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-1
|
-1
|
-
|
28
|
6
|
9
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
70 |
rushes |
-
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
17 |
| rshTDs |
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0 |
| recYds |
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0 |
| Tar/Rec |
- |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
| TM Tar% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
- |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
- |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
- |
- |
0% |
0% |
| recTDs |
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0 |
| FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
-1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
| FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
-1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
| Opp |
@ lac
|
ari
|
@ ten
|
den
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
hou
|
@ no
|
@ jac
|
ind
|
@ den
|
@ sea
|
lac
|
@ lar
|
ne
|
@ pit
|
sf
|
kc
|
|
|
| |
Zamir White 2023 Outlook
The only other Las Vegas Raiders running back in our top 75 is White, although as of this writing, Ameer Abdullah and Brandon Bolden also occupy spots behind Josh Jacobs on their depth chart. Abdullah and Bolden are on the back nines of their careers, while White makes the most sense to assume the No. 2 running back mantle in Las Vegas this year. The main problem with this from a fantasy perspective is that even being RB2 won’t equate to opportunities. The Raiders had 428 rushing attempts as a team in McDaniels’ first season as coach, and Jacobs was responsible for 340 of them, a whopping 79.4 percent. The next closest running backs were White and Bolden with 17 apiece. White is more talented than his fourth-round draft status would lead on; he was a national top-10 high school recruit before ACL tears in both knees set him back early on in his college career. But he won’t siphon Jacobs’ red-zone touches and did not see a single target in the passing game as a rookie. The hope here is that Jacobs’ outsized production share regresses a bit and gives White more opportunities.
| |
