2022 Stats | CHI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
90% |
94% |
85% |
94% |
92% |
80% |
86% |
86% |
87% |
81% |
32% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
83% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
recYds |
8
|
-4
|
23
|
94
|
52
|
68
|
53
|
70
|
43
|
57
|
29
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
493 |
Tar/Rec |
3/1 |
2/1 |
6/2 |
5/4 |
5/2 |
12/7 |
6/3 |
5/5 |
8/7 |
4/4 |
5/4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
61/40 |
TM Tar% |
- |
20% |
40% |
31% |
26% |
48% |
29% |
22% |
32% |
24% |
28% |
0% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
27% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2 |
FScore |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
10 |
5 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
FS/PPR |
1 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
7 |
13 |
8 |
12 |
17 |
9 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
101 |
Opp |
sf
|
@ gb
|
hou
|
@ nyg
|
@ min
|
was
|
@ ne
|
@ dal
|
mia
|
det
|
@ atl
|
@ nyj
|
gb
|
bye
|
phi
|
buf
|
@ det
|
min
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | CHI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
100% |
89% |
98% |
71% |
77% |
93% |
86% |
77% |
81% |
- |
92% |
87% |
95% |
92% |
96% |
85% |
85% |
90% |
88% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
32 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
6 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
recYds |
26
|
66
|
9
|
125
|
35
|
45
|
39
|
64
|
41
|
-
|
121
|
123
|
27
|
19
|
63
|
57
|
69
|
126
|
1055 |
Tar/Rec |
7/5 |
8/6 |
4/1 |
7/5 |
5/3 |
8/5 |
5/2 |
9/6 |
6/3 |
- |
16/5 |
8/5 |
7/5 |
5/1 |
7/5 |
9/5 |
13/7 |
16/12 |
140/81 |
TM Tar% |
18% |
35% |
22% |
41% |
25% |
33% |
17% |
33% |
21% |
- |
48% |
24% |
18% |
16% |
20% |
26% |
45% |
45% |
28% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
4 |
FScore |
2 |
6 |
0 |
13 |
3 |
10 |
3 |
6 |
17 |
0 |
18 |
12 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
12 |
12 |
138 |
FS/PPR |
7 |
12 |
1 |
18 |
6 |
15 |
5 |
12 |
20 |
0 |
23 |
17 |
7 |
2 |
11 |
10 |
19 |
24 |
219 |
Opp |
@ lar
|
cin
|
@ cle
|
det
|
@ lvr
|
gb
|
@ tb
|
sf
|
@ pit
|
bye
|
bal
|
@ det
|
ari
|
@ gb
|
min
|
@ sea
|
nyg
|
@ min
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | CHI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
32% |
60% |
62% |
74% |
65% |
67% |
81% |
93% |
87% |
92% |
- |
85% |
81% |
75% |
83% |
74% |
60% |
73% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
16
|
2
|
0
|
20 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
4 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
38
|
36
|
19
|
52
|
15
|
36
|
40
|
69
|
43
|
3
|
-
|
34
|
43
|
22
|
49
|
39
|
93
|
631 |
Tar/Rec |
3/3 |
3/3 |
5/2 |
9/5 |
5/2 |
5/3 |
7/3 |
6/5 |
11/5 |
2/2 |
- |
9/3 |
6/4 |
2/2 |
5/4 |
7/4 |
13/11 |
98/61 |
TM Tar% |
9% |
13% |
10% |
22% |
12% |
15% |
18% |
15% |
23% |
7% |
- |
20% |
19% |
6% |
26% |
19% |
33% |
17% |
recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
FScore |
3 |
9 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
4 |
9 |
89 |
FS/PPR |
6 |
12 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
17 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
16 |
8 |
20 |
150 |
Opp |
@ det
|
nyg
|
@ atl
|
ind
|
tb
|
@ car
|
@ lar
|
no
|
@ ten
|
min
|
bye
|
@ gb
|
det
|
hou
|
@ min
|
@ jac
|
gb
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | CHI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
recYds |
38
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
38 |
Tar/Rec |
3/3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3/3 |
TM Tar% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
recTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
FScore |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
FS/PPR |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
Opp |
@ det
|
nyg
|
@ atl
|
ind
|
tb
|
@ car
|
@ lar
|
no
|
@ ten
|
min
|
bye
|
@ gb
|
det
|
hou
|
@ min
|
@ jac
|
gb
|
|
|
|
Darnell Mooney 2022 Outlook
As Fansided.com's Evan Bruner recently noted, Allen Robinson's regression in 2021 required Mooney to take on a larger role in the passing game. Mooney was up for the task and finished his second year in the league with 81 catches for 1,055 yards. Playing in Matt Nagy's offense with a rookie quarterback and subpar offensive line did Mooney no my favors. Bruner went on to contend no matter how much the Bears' offense struggles going forward, it's hard to imagine things will look much worse than they did in Mooney's first two seasons. That's a fair point. Still, there are those who question whether Mooney is truly suited to handling a WR1 role. With Byron Pringle, Equanimeous St. Brown and 25-year-old rookie Velus Jones Jr. all joining this receiving room, none of them profiles as alphas. Let's also acknowledge the previous coaching staff absolutely treated Mooney like their leading weapon. He finished the last four weeks of the season ninth in target share (27 percent) and fifth in route participation (95 percent). With nobody worth much outside of third-year tight end Cole Kmet as legitimate competition, Mooney should build off his eighth-ranked 24 percent target share from last season if for no other reason than his strong relationship with Justin Fields, who was comfortable throwing to Mooney in big spots and showed great trust in his receiver to come down with tough catches.
Darnell Mooney 2021 Outlook
USA Today's Alyssa Barbieri recently reminded readers the Bears got an absolute steal in last year's NFL draft with Mooney, who they snagged in the fifth round. It didn't take Mooney long to establish himself as Chicago's No. 2 receiver behind Allen Robinson -- and that was without the courtesy of a full offseason. Mooney was surprisingly productive and likely would have been even more so if the Bears had more consistent quarterback play. "Especially," Barbieri added, "given Mooney typically had his man beat deep. ..." Mooney will enter the 2021 season as the WR2 alongside Robinson, which leaves the future of Anthony Miller -- the guy he passed up -- in jeopardy. The Bears have reportedly been shopping Miller, which isn't a surprise given he hasn't lived up to expectations and in light of his ejection in the wild card game against the New Orleans Saints. Many believed Miller was a prime cut candidate, but it sounds like he has suitors. Whatever the case, there's considerable hype surrounding Mooney heading into his second season, where the hope is that he'll get better quarterback play, whether it's veteran Andy Dalton or rookie Justin Fields. Mooney's speed and sure hands add to the positive outlook.
| | | |