2023 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
98% |
76% |
83% |
80% |
50% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
76% |
rshYds |
-
|
88
|
122
|
70
|
165
|
21
|
57
|
66
|
26
|
2
|
-
|
55
|
51
|
28
|
13
|
-
|
-
|
30
|
794 |
rushes |
-
|
18
|
30
|
18
|
23
|
7
|
18
|
11
|
7
|
1
|
-
|
8
|
19
|
13
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
183 |
rshTDs |
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
5 |
recYds |
-
|
19
|
23
|
0
|
30
|
38
|
5
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
15
|
6
|
28
|
20
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
192 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
4/4 |
3/2 |
1/0 |
2/2 |
7/6 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
3/2 |
3/2 |
8/4 |
3/3 |
- |
- |
0/0 |
37/27 |
TM Tar% |
- |
13% |
7% |
4% |
8% |
15% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10% |
recTDs |
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
2 |
FScore |
0 |
16 |
20 |
7 |
31 |
11 |
6 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
140 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
20 |
22 |
7 |
33 |
17 |
7 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
167 |
Opp |
jac
|
@ hou
|
@ bal
|
lar
|
ten
|
@ jac
|
cle
|
no
|
@ car
|
@ ne
|
bye
|
tb
|
@ ten
|
@ cin
|
pit
|
@ atl
|
lvr
|
hou
|
|
|
|
2022 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
37% |
19% |
17% |
9% |
29% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2% |
6% |
2% |
7% |
- |
67% |
69% |
59% |
58% |
29% |
rshYds |
15
|
17
|
46
|
6
|
7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
7
|
2
|
18
|
-
|
81
|
65
|
74
|
114
|
456 |
rushes |
6
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
-
|
24
|
12
|
15
|
18
|
93 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1 |
recYds |
21
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
7
|
39 |
Tar/Rec |
6/6 |
1/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
1/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
3/3 |
13/11 |
TM Tar% |
19% |
3% |
2% |
0% |
0% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
- |
4% |
4% |
0% |
0% |
3% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
3 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
18 |
55 |
FS/PPR |
9 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
21 |
66 |
Opp |
@ hou
|
@ jac
|
kc
|
ten
|
@ den
|
jac
|
@ ten
|
was
|
@ ne
|
@ lvr
|
phi
|
pit
|
@ dal
|
bye
|
@ min
|
lac
|
@ nyg
|
hou
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
28% |
56% |
56% |
74% |
55% |
- |
64% |
28% |
48% |
29% |
- |
41% |
- |
- |
33% |
21% |
22% |
42% |
rshYds |
-
|
26
|
60
|
61
|
37
|
24
|
-
|
19
|
6
|
27
|
5
|
-
|
21
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
39
|
8
|
345 |
rushes |
-
|
8
|
13
|
14
|
11
|
8
|
-
|
8
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
-
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
96 |
rshTDs |
-
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
recYds |
-
|
8
|
31
|
0
|
55
|
15
|
-
|
39
|
18
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
13
|
0
|
6
|
197 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
2/2 |
3/3 |
1/0 |
4/3 |
4/2 |
- |
7/6 |
4/2 |
0/0 |
1/0 |
- |
3/2 |
- |
- |
1/1 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
32/23 |
TM Tar% |
- |
7% |
7% |
3% |
17% |
0% |
- |
19% |
9% |
0% |
3% |
- |
10% |
- |
- |
2% |
0% |
0% |
7% |
recTDs |
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
FScore |
0 |
15 |
15 |
12 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
84 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
17 |
18 |
12 |
12 |
5 |
0 |
11 |
4 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
107 |
Opp |
pit
|
@ mia
|
was
|
hou
|
@ kc
|
@ ten
|
bye
|
mia
|
@ jac
|
@ nyj
|
ind
|
@ no
|
ne
|
@ tb
|
car
|
@ ne
|
atl
|
nyj
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
45% |
46% |
- |
- |
- |
25% |
47% |
53% |
56% |
53% |
- |
60% |
- |
59% |
47% |
50% |
28% |
48% |
rshYds |
11
|
37
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
47
|
81
|
18
|
20
|
-
|
59
|
9
|
43
|
81
|
57
|
8
|
481 |
rushes |
9
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
7
|
14
|
9
|
7
|
-
|
9
|
3
|
13
|
13
|
12
|
3
|
112 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
4 |
recYds |
16
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
25
|
0
|
30
|
-3
|
-
|
9
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
95 |
Tar/Rec |
4/3 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
- |
0/0 |
3/3 |
1/0 |
2/2 |
2/1 |
- |
2/2 |
1/1 |
1/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
18/14 |
TM Tar% |
9% |
0% |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
7% |
6% |
5% |
5% |
- |
8% |
- |
2% |
0% |
3% |
3% |
4% |
recTDs |
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
FScore |
8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
20 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
11 |
2 |
87 |
FS/PPR |
11 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
3 |
101 |
Opp |
nyj
|
@ mia
|
lar
|
@ lvr
|
@ ten
|
kc
|
@ nyj
|
ne
|
sea
|
@ ari
|
bye
|
lac
|
@ sf
|
pit
|
@ den
|
@ ne
|
mia
|
|
|
|
Zack Moss 2023 Outlook
The Buffalo Bills were never going to use Moss in a major role, so their decision to deal him to the Indianapolis Colts at the trade deadline last season came as little surprise. He didn’t receive any attention until Week 15, once Jonathan Taylor went down with a high ankle sprain. Moss averaged 83.5 rushing yards on 17.3 carries per game (4.84 per carry) over the final four games as the Colts’ starting running back. If not for that stretch at the end of the year, it’s doubtful Moss would have made this list of 75. Moss enters the 2023 season as the presumptive No. 2 back behind Taylor, with Deon Jackson and fifth-round draft pick Evan Hull likely vying for a fraction of the touches. Can Moss make the most of this second opportunity? Taylor is an All-Pro running back who tends to carry the offense when healthy. Don’t expect many touchdowns or anything out of the passing game for Moss, either. But having Anthony Richardson at quarterback and Shane Steichen as head coach should lead to a run-heavy scheme.
Zack Moss 2021 Outlook
As SBNation.com reminded readers, after the 2019 running back combo of Devin Singletary and Frank Gore didn't go as well as hoped, the Bills drafted Moss in the third round of the 2020 NFL Draft. The new combo of Singletary and Moss also did not go as well as hoped. Still, heading into 2021 the Bills opted not to add to their backfield at the draft. Clearly that bodes well for Moss, and some view him as a rising fantasy prospect. Pro Football Focus pointed out that not only did the Bills pass on some talented backs, Buffalo spent considerable capital on improving in the trenches. This included an offensive lineman to finish Day 2 and another to start Day 3. PFF went on to contend Moss should see over 50 percent of the rushing snaps, along with over 50 percent of red zone snaps. While this seems reasonable, it's also worth noting Moss started to out snap Singletary before his ankle injury in the postseason. That said, baseline expectations are that the Bills will likely run with the hot hand once things get going this season.
| | | |