2022 Stats | KAN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
44% |
40% |
56% |
43% |
42% |
27% |
- |
17% |
6% |
8% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
31% |
rshYds |
42
|
74
|
0
|
92
|
15
|
33
|
32
|
-
|
5
|
-
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
302 |
rushes |
7
|
8
|
7
|
19
|
9
|
9
|
6
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
71 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3 |
recYds |
32
|
44
|
39
|
2
|
20
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
14
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
151 |
Tar/Rec |
3/3 |
4/4 |
5/5 |
2/1 |
4/3 |
0/0 |
1/0 |
- |
2/1 |
- |
0/0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
21/17 |
TM Tar% |
- |
12% |
16% |
6% |
10% |
0% |
3% |
- |
3% |
0% |
0% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6% |
recTDs |
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3 |
FScore |
19 |
11 |
9 |
21 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
FS/PPR |
22 |
15 |
14 |
22 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
98 |
Opp |
@ ari
|
lac
|
@ ind
|
@ tb
|
lvr
|
buf
|
@ sf
|
bye
|
ten
|
jac
|
@ lac
|
lar
|
@ cin
|
@ den
|
@ hou
|
sea
|
den
|
@ lvr
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | KAN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
72% |
65% |
62% |
52% |
26% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47% |
- |
51% |
35% |
71% |
30% |
- |
- |
50% |
rshYds |
43
|
46
|
100
|
102
|
13
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
63
|
-
|
54
|
37
|
32
|
27
|
-
|
-
|
517 |
rushes |
14
|
13
|
17
|
14
|
7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
-
|
14
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
119 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
4 |
recYds |
29
|
0
|
9
|
12
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13
|
-
|
28
|
5
|
18
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
129 |
Tar/Rec |
3/3 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
3/2 |
2/1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2/2 |
- |
3/3 |
3/3 |
4/2 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
23/19 |
TM Tar% |
9% |
0% |
5% |
10% |
4% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6% |
- |
12% |
14% |
10% |
4% |
- |
- |
7% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
2 |
FScore |
7 |
4 |
16 |
17 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
8 |
16 |
5 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
FS/PPR |
10 |
4 |
18 |
19 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
11 |
19 |
7 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
119 |
Opp |
cle
|
@ bal
|
lac
|
@ phi
|
buf
|
@ was
|
@ ten
|
nyg
|
gb
|
@ lvr
|
dal
|
bye
|
den
|
lvr
|
@ lac
|
pit
|
@ cin
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | KAN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
67% |
62% |
69% |
73% |
60% |
67% |
53% |
50% |
40% |
- |
51% |
59% |
- |
74% |
46% |
- |
- |
59% |
rshYds |
138
|
38
|
64
|
64
|
40
|
161
|
46
|
21
|
14
|
-
|
69
|
37
|
-
|
32
|
79
|
-
|
-
|
803 |
rushes |
25
|
10
|
20
|
16
|
10
|
26
|
8
|
6
|
5
|
-
|
14
|
11
|
-
|
16
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
181 |
rshTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
4 |
recYds |
0
|
32
|
70
|
27
|
40
|
8
|
17
|
10
|
20
|
-
|
8
|
2
|
-
|
59
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
297 |
Tar/Rec |
2/0 |
8/6 |
6/5 |
3/3 |
8/3 |
4/4 |
4/1 |
3/3 |
5/3 |
- |
2/1 |
1/1 |
- |
6/5 |
2/1 |
- |
- |
54/36 |
TM Tar% |
6% |
18% |
16% |
11% |
20% |
17% |
17% |
6% |
11% |
- |
5% |
2% |
- |
18% |
7% |
- |
- |
11% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
FScore |
19 |
7 |
13 |
9 |
8 |
16 |
12 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
19 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
140 |
FS/PPR |
19 |
13 |
18 |
12 |
11 |
20 |
13 |
6 |
12 |
0 |
20 |
4 |
0 |
14 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
176 |
Opp |
hou
|
@ lac
|
@ bal
|
ne
|
lvr
|
@ buf
|
@ den
|
nyj
|
car
|
bye
|
@ lvr
|
@ tb
|
den
|
@ mia
|
@ no
|
atl
|
lac
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | KAN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
rshYds |
138
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
138 |
rushes |
25
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
25 |
rshTDs |
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
recYds |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
Tar/Rec |
2/0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2/0 |
TM Tar% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0% |
recTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
FScore |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
FS/PPR |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
Opp |
hou
|
@ lac
|
@ bal
|
ne
|
lvr
|
@ buf
|
@ den
|
nyj
|
car
|
bye
|
@ lvr
|
@ tb
|
den
|
@ mia
|
@ no
|
atl
|
lac
|
|
|
|
Clyde Edwards-Helaire 2022 Outlook
As USA Today notes, over his first two seasons in Kansas City, Edwards-Helaire played in just 26-of-39 possible games (combined regular season and postseason). These absences have largely been due to injuries. Despite the injuries, Edwards-Helaire has managed to deliver solid-but-unspectacular production with 328 career carries for 1,487 yards and nine rushing touchdowns. He's also caught 60 passes on 86 targets for 462 yards and three touchdowns. Beyond the injuries, the issue for fantasy managers is obvious: Despite being the starting RB in an explosive offense featuring the best quarterback in football, Patrick Mahomes, and two of the best pass catchers in the NFL in Tyreek Hill and Travis Kelce, CEH has fallen far short of expectations. In fact, as Pro Football Network pointed out, over the past several seasons, we've seen RB1 or RB1-level performance out of the likes of Kareem Hunt, Damien Williams and Spencer Ware in this offense. Edwards-Helaire can't make that claim. In fact, he was the least productive of the Chiefs' three main backs last season, with Darrel Williams flat outperforming CEH and Jerick McKinnon proving to be more effective on a per-game basis. Williams is gone but McKinnon, former Buccaneer Ronald Jones and Derrick Gore are still on the roster. Expecting a sudden turnaround for CEH is a reach.
Clyde Edwards-Helaire 2021 Outlook
When the Chiefs selected Edwards-Helaire with the 32nd overall pick in the 2020 draft, our interest was piqued. That interest only increased after Damien Williams opted out shortly thereafter. Indeed, as Fansided.com reminded readers, the general consensus among observers was that Edwards-Helaire would be an ideal fit in Andy Reid's offense. In the end, it's safe to say we didn't get the full measure of anticipated production. While it was surprising watching a player known for being the best pass-catching back rarely used in that role, it went beyond that. As SI.com noted, in his first six games, Edwards-Helaire averaged 21.3 touches and just over 15 fantasy points per game. He was also on pace to rush for over 1,300 yards (and 1,800 scrimmage yards) in his final seven games. With Le'Veon Bell on the Chiefs' roster, Edwards-Helaire averaged 12.7 touches and 11 fantasy points per game. This season, Bell is gone and Williams has moved on in free agency. Given that, Edwards-Helaire should see an increase in touches and production. If he can provide a missing element in this offense -- as Fansided suggested, the one that left when the team released Kareem Hunt during the 2018 season -- fantasy managers could get a draft-day steal.
Clyde Edwards-Helaire 2020 Outlook
Damien Williams will at least head into training camp as the Chiefs' starting running back based on his production last season. But the Chiefs didn't use a first-round choice on Edwards-Helaire to have him sit and watch. He will play, and play a lot as Edwards-Helaire ranks among the favorites for offensive rookie of the year. He looks like a perfect fit for what the Chiefs do on offense, giving HC Andy Reid, OC Eric Bieniemy and Patrick Mahomes yet another weapon. It should be noted that the newcomer isn't particularly fast (4.60 40-yard dash) and is on the small side, which raises some questions about his strength and ability to pass protect. Of course the concern with any rookie back is blocking, and his production simply can't be ignored. As ESPN's Mike Clay noted, Edwards-Helaire's elite elusiveness and tackle-breaking ability showed up in PFF's metrics, and he forced one missed tackle for every 2.7 touches -- the best ratio in this rookie class. Pass catching is obviously important in fantasy (especially PPR), so it's notable that Edwards-Helaire also paced this class in targets (65), receptions (55) and receiving yards (453) last season. He has three-down upside, though it's possible his 5-7 frame could cost him goal-line touches. Nonetheless, this kind of weapon in such a potent offense is going to be very popular come draft day.
| | | |