2022 Stats | CHI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
80% |
17% |
- |
72% |
78% |
56% |
70% |
70% |
66% |
80% |
68% |
77% |
- |
68% |
67% |
54% |
47% |
65% |
rshYds |
26
|
122
|
11
|
-
|
20
|
67
|
62
|
53
|
36
|
37
|
67
|
79
|
61
|
-
|
53
|
62
|
24
|
21
|
801 |
rushes |
17
|
15
|
3
|
-
|
12
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
14
|
9
|
17
|
14
|
14
|
-
|
12
|
16
|
6
|
7
|
201 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5 |
recYds |
24
|
14
|
0
|
-
|
62
|
13
|
0
|
22
|
8
|
7
|
54
|
34
|
6
|
-
|
38
|
22
|
12
|
0
|
316 |
Tar/Rec |
4/3 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
- |
4/4 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
3/3 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
4/3 |
4/3 |
5/4 |
- |
3/3 |
4/4 |
3/2 |
0/0 |
40/34 |
TM Tar% |
- |
20% |
0% |
- |
21% |
4% |
0% |
13% |
8% |
6% |
22% |
17% |
20% |
- |
15% |
16% |
27% |
27% |
14% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
FScore |
5 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
14 |
8 |
12 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
18 |
11 |
12 |
0 |
21 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
147 |
FS/PPR |
8 |
15 |
1 |
0 |
18 |
9 |
12 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
21 |
14 |
16 |
0 |
24 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
181 |
Opp |
sf
|
@ gb
|
hou
|
@ nyg
|
@ min
|
was
|
@ ne
|
@ dal
|
mia
|
det
|
@ atl
|
@ nyj
|
gb
|
bye
|
phi
|
buf
|
@ det
|
min
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | CHI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
59% |
80% |
82% |
62% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
85% |
- |
95% |
84% |
70% |
84% |
70% |
78% |
68% |
60% |
75% |
rshYds |
108
|
61
|
34
|
106
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
63
|
-
|
58
|
46
|
90
|
42
|
60
|
45
|
64
|
72
|
849 |
rushes |
16
|
20
|
10
|
23
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13
|
-
|
14
|
17
|
21
|
10
|
18
|
21
|
22
|
20
|
225 |
rshTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
7 |
recYds |
10
|
18
|
21
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
-
|
9
|
28
|
51
|
39
|
23
|
61
|
17
|
7
|
301 |
Tar/Rec |
1/1 |
4/3 |
4/2 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2/2 |
- |
1/1 |
3/3 |
9/8 |
7/6 |
6/5 |
9/7 |
2/2 |
3/2 |
51/42 |
TM Tar% |
3% |
17% |
22% |
0% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7% |
- |
3% |
9% |
23% |
22% |
17% |
26% |
7% |
7% |
13% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
17 |
7 |
5 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
6 |
7 |
20 |
8 |
8 |
16 |
19 |
7 |
156 |
FS/PPR |
18 |
10 |
7 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
28 |
14 |
13 |
23 |
21 |
9 |
198 |
Opp |
@ lar
|
cin
|
@ cle
|
det
|
@ lvr
|
gb
|
@ tb
|
sf
|
@ pit
|
bye
|
bal
|
@ det
|
ari
|
@ gb
|
min
|
@ sea
|
nyg
|
@ min
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | CHI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
45% |
54% |
56% |
85% |
81% |
85% |
83% |
84% |
65% |
- |
- |
85% |
75% |
67% |
88% |
83% |
83% |
74% |
rshYds |
64
|
82
|
45
|
27
|
29
|
58
|
48
|
89
|
30
|
-
|
-
|
103
|
72
|
113
|
146
|
95
|
69
|
1070 |
rushes |
13
|
16
|
14
|
10
|
10
|
19
|
14
|
21
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
17
|
11
|
32
|
23
|
22
|
247 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
8 |
recYds |
10
|
45
|
9
|
30
|
30
|
39
|
21
|
16
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
40
|
39
|
42
|
16
|
26
|
63
|
438 |
Tar/Rec |
3/1 |
3/3 |
3/2 |
6/3 |
8/7 |
5/4 |
5/5 |
5/2 |
3/3 |
- |
- |
6/5 |
4/4 |
4/3 |
2/1 |
2/2 |
9/9 |
68/54 |
TM Tar% |
9% |
13% |
6% |
15% |
19% |
15% |
13% |
12% |
6% |
- |
- |
14% |
13% |
12% |
11% |
6% |
23% |
12% |
recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
FScore |
7 |
18 |
5 |
5 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
10 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
23 |
21 |
28 |
18 |
19 |
210 |
FS/PPR |
8 |
21 |
7 |
8 |
18 |
13 |
11 |
12 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
27 |
24 |
29 |
20 |
28 |
264 |
Opp |
@ det
|
nyg
|
@ atl
|
ind
|
tb
|
@ car
|
@ lar
|
no
|
@ ten
|
min
|
bye
|
@ gb
|
det
|
hou
|
@ min
|
@ jac
|
gb
|
|
|
|
David Montgomery 2023 Outlook
Speaking of David Montgomery! The Detroit Lions picked him up in March before swapping out No. 1 back D’Andre Swift (via trade to the Eagles) for 12th overall draft pick Jahmyr Gibbs. The tandem of Gibbs and Montgomery will be one to watch in 2023. As you might deduce from these rankings, we see Gibbs as the primary ball-carrier and Montgomery in a secondary role focused on short yardage. Montgomery’s touchdown totals have stayed consistently between five and eight per year throughout his first four NFL seasons. He got a respectable 31 touches inside the 20 last year with Chicago, but this is a new team and a new coaching staff. Here’s the most intriguing thing about Montgomery (and Gibbs) this season: Their schedule. They’re currently projected to face the easiest schedule for running backs. Several of the worst run defenses from 2022 are on their agenda, including the Seahawks, the Chargers and two games apiece against the Packers and Bears -- the latter of whom allowed a league-high 31 rushing TDs.
David Montgomery 2022 Outlook
The heart and soul of the Bears' offense, Montgomery continued to ascend in 2021. Despite missing four games with a knee injury, the 2019 third-round draft pick from Iowa State led the team in rushing for the third straight season, compiling 849 yards and seven touchdowns on 225 carries. He also caught 42 passes for 301 yards. In generating 1,150 yards from scrimmage, Montgomery became just the fourth player in Bears history to produce at least 1,000 yards in each of his first three seasons, joining Hall of Famer Gale Sayers, Matt Forte and Jordan Howard. Montgomery gained 1,074 yards in 2019 (889 rushing, 185 receiving in 15 games) and 1,508 yards in 2020 (1,070 rushing, 438 receiving in 15 contests). In a Week 13 loss to the Cardinals, Montgomery compiled a season-high 141 yards from scrimmage, rushing for 90 yards and one TD on 21 carries and catching eight passes for 51 yards. Heading into the final year of his rookie contract, Montgomery isn't worried about the money -- but he knows the path to getting paid. "I still got to play football, and I still got to perform," Montgomery said. From a fantasy perspective, Montgomery's consistent usage and production make him an excellent -- if not flashy -- starting asset. The arrival of new head coach Matt Eberflus, a former defensive coordinator, means continued reliance on the rushing attack is likely.
David Montgomery 2021 Outlook
In his second season, Montgomery tied for fifth in the NFL in rushing and became the first Bears' back to top 1,000 yards since Jordan Howard in 2017. But Montgomery's was another tale of two seasons. He scored 105 fantasy points (11.6 per week) in his first nine games. He averaged 3.6 yards per rush attempt and ranked 14th in total points among running backs. Then, after missing a game with a concussion, Montgomery rushed for 434 yards and five touchdowns on 71 carries. Only NFL leading rusher Derrick Henry of the Titans had more yards and TDs during that span. Montgomery topped 100 yards in three of those four contests. As a result, Montgomery scored 153 fantasy points (averaging 25.5 per game) over the final six weeks of the season. He averaged 5.2 yards per rush attempt and ranked third in total points among running backs in that time. But schedule was a factor. As SI.com pointed out, during that stretch, Chicago's opponents were all in the top six in terms of allowing the most fantasy points to running backs. While Montgomery showed some breakaway ability in those later weeks, the additions of Damien Williams, rookie Khalil Herbert and the return of Tarik Cohen will be limiting factors.
| | |