2021 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
52% |
- |
- |
63% |
69% |
64% |
36% |
- |
49% |
57% |
66% |
66% |
85% |
75% |
65% |
70% |
61% |
71% |
63% |
rshYds |
34
|
-
|
-
|
40
|
48
|
53
|
29
|
-
|
76
|
16
|
37
|
87
|
52
|
24
|
52
|
129
|
63
|
132
|
872 |
rushes |
10
|
-
|
-
|
13
|
15
|
16
|
6
|
-
|
13
|
7
|
9
|
22
|
13
|
9
|
15
|
27
|
16
|
26
|
217 |
rshTDs |
2
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
9 |
recYds |
6
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
19
|
29
|
39
|
-
|
19
|
20
|
24
|
25
|
38
|
46
|
42
|
-5
|
17
|
12
|
348 |
Tar/Rec |
2/1 |
- |
- |
5/5 |
5/4 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
- |
4/4 |
5/5 |
7/5 |
4/2 |
9/9 |
6/5 |
4/3 |
3/1 |
4/4 |
2/2 |
64/54 |
TM Tar% |
4% |
- |
- |
16% |
15% |
4% |
9% |
- |
10% |
15% |
28% |
11% |
25% |
14% |
11% |
12% |
13% |
13% |
13% |
recTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
16 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
14 |
12 |
0 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
17 |
15 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
14 |
20 |
176 |
FS/PPR |
17 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
16 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
13 |
8 |
11 |
19 |
24 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
18 |
22 |
230 |
Opp |
bal
|
@ pit
|
mia
|
@ lac
|
chi
|
@ den
|
phi
|
bye
|
@ nyg
|
kc
|
cin
|
@ dal
|
was
|
@ kc
|
@ cle
|
den
|
@ ind
|
lac
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
78% |
66% |
59% |
68% |
64% |
- |
49% |
67% |
56% |
60% |
75% |
60% |
- |
43% |
68% |
50% |
55% |
61% |
rshYds |
93
|
88
|
71
|
48
|
77
|
-
|
17
|
129
|
65
|
112
|
55
|
27
|
-
|
49
|
76
|
69
|
89
|
1065 |
rushes |
25
|
27
|
16
|
15
|
23
|
-
|
10
|
31
|
14
|
21
|
17
|
7
|
-
|
13
|
26
|
13
|
15
|
273 |
rshTDs |
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
12 |
recYds |
46
|
17
|
12
|
25
|
8
|
-
|
14
|
0
|
3
|
24
|
9
|
17
|
-
|
25
|
38
|
0
|
0
|
238 |
Tar/Rec |
6/4 |
3/3 |
4/3 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
- |
4/3 |
1/0 |
1/1 |
4/4 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
- |
5/3 |
3/3 |
2/0 |
1/0 |
45/33 |
TM Tar% |
21% |
9% |
13% |
9% |
10% |
- |
11% |
5% |
4% |
18% |
3% |
8% |
- |
11% |
10% |
7% |
3% |
10% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
31 |
10 |
8 |
7 |
20 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
12 |
25 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
7 |
17 |
6 |
20 |
202 |
FS/PPR |
35 |
13 |
11 |
10 |
22 |
0 |
6 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
13 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
6 |
20 |
235 |
Opp |
@ car
|
no
|
@ ne
|
buf
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
tb
|
@ cle
|
@ lac
|
den
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
@ nyj
|
ind
|
lac
|
mia
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
rshYds |
85
|
99
|
44
|
79
|
123
|
-
|
124
|
66
|
120
|
71
|
112
|
34
|
104
|
-
|
89
|
-
|
-
|
1150 |
rushes |
23
|
12
|
10
|
17
|
26
|
-
|
21
|
15
|
28
|
16
|
23
|
10
|
17
|
-
|
24
|
-
|
-
|
242 |
rshTDs |
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
7 |
recYds |
28
|
0
|
0
|
29
|
20
|
-
|
10
|
15
|
0
|
30
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
-
|
166 |
Tar/Rec |
1/1 |
0/0 |
2/0 |
2/2 |
3/3 |
- |
3/3 |
2/2 |
2/0 |
5/3 |
3/3 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
- |
3/2 |
- |
- |
27/20 |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
FScore |
23 |
9 |
4 |
10 |
26 |
0 |
13 |
8 |
24 |
16 |
12 |
3 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
173 |
FS/PPR |
24 |
9 |
4 |
12 |
29 |
0 |
16 |
10 |
24 |
19 |
15 |
4 |
10 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
193 |
Opp |
@ car
|
no
|
@ ne
|
buf
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
tb
|
@ cle
|
@ lac
|
den
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
@ nyj
|
ind
|
lac
|
mia
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
Josh Jacobs 2022 Outlook
The Raiders announced in April they were not picking up Jacobs' fifth-year option, which would have carried a price tag for 2023 of $8.034 million. ... Although he's rushed for 3,087 yards and 28 touchdowns while averaging 4.2 yards per carry and catching 107 passes for 752 yards in three seasons, his rushing totals have diminished in each of his three seasons. Along with Jacobs, the Raiders return Kenyan Drake at running back, though Drake is returning from a season-ending ankle injury that came in Week 13. Las Vegas also signed a pair of former New England Patriots in Brandon Bolden and Jakob Johnson, as well as NFL veteran Ameer Abdullah. Then the Raiders drafted a pair of running backs on Day 3, taking Georgia's Zamir White in the fourth round and UCLA's Brittain Brown in the seventh round with new GM Dave Ziegler noting there are differing roles to be filled and all the backs will compete for playing time. That said, as Pro Football Focus pointed out, "Jacobs has been as advertised since entering the league in 2019, with his 90.8 rushing grade being the sixth-best mark among rushers with at least 100 carries. His 0.24 missed tackles forced per rushing attempt is tied for fourth, and his 77 explosive rushes rank sixth." Even assuming a competition is coming, it's fair to believe the Raiders, with no worries about a long-term commitment, will feel comfortable using Jacobs heavily.
Josh Jacobs 2021 Outlook
The Raiders already had a certifiable No. 1 running back, a Pro Bowler with a pair of 1,000-yard rushing seasons to begin his NFL career. Jacobs was a first-round pick in 2019 and is seemingly still on his ascent. So why would the defensively-deficient Raiders feel the need to add another potential RB1 in free agency and pay Kenyan Drake like a starter? Because Jacobs -- again, the unquestioned lead back -- has base salaries totaling more than $3.7 million the next two seasons (though Drake has more than $11.9 million in guaranteed money in his Raiders contract). So, there is no running back controversy in Sin City. But ESPN.com notes that Jacobs has slowed down the stretch in his first two seasons, missing three of the Raiders' last four games with a shoulder fracture as a rookie and then averaging almost a full yard less per carry last season than he did in 2019, 4.8-3.9. Consider Drake, then, an expensive insurance policy -- and a much more capable pass catcher than Jacobs. As ESPN's Matthew Berry noted, Jacobs needs two things to keep his fantasy value high: volume and scoring. With Drake on board, both things are in question this season.
Josh Jacobs 2020 Outlook
As NFL.com noted, Jacobs flashed his potential as a rookie, posting four top-10 performances. He did rank outside of the top 20 seven times, but Jacobs should become more consistent this season -- especially if the Raiders find a way to improve on his 20 catches for a mere 166 yards. The good news? Per ESPN.com, GM Mike Mayock recently spoke of "Phase 2", emphasizing that he expects the star back to be more heavily-involved in the passing game. Remember, HC Jon Gruden often raved about how complete a player Jacobs is, saying, "He's the perfect centerpiece for our offense." Nearly half of Jacobs' receptions (nine) came in his last five games, so he was becoming a bigger part of the Raiders' passing game, but missing three of the last four with a shoulder injury sapped any momentum. Also worth noting here: Despite playing just 13 games and receiving the 13th-most carries, Jacobs led the league in broken tackles while carrying the ball. Remember, Jacobs saw at least seven defenders in the box for over 53 percent of his carries last year. Assuming he remains healthy, the role alone will keep Jacobs in RB1 territory and there’s room for even more if the Raiders find ways to utilize him as a receiver.
| | |