2023 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
80% |
72% |
82% |
70% |
84% |
81% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
79% |
rshYds |
48
|
-2
|
62
|
58
|
69
|
77
|
35
|
61
|
98
|
116
|
39
|
110
|
-
|
34
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
805 |
rushes |
19
|
9
|
17
|
17
|
20
|
25
|
11
|
15
|
26
|
27
|
14
|
20
|
-
|
13
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
233 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6 |
recYds |
23
|
51
|
18
|
81
|
20
|
16
|
6
|
27
|
0
|
11
|
12
|
15
|
-
|
16
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
296 |
Tar/Rec |
3/2 |
6/5 |
5/3 |
11/8 |
5/5 |
5/2 |
4/1 |
4/2 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
1/1 |
6/4 |
- |
2/2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
54/37 |
TM Tar% |
12% |
27% |
12% |
29% |
17% |
17% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
19% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
FScore |
7 |
4 |
8 |
19 |
14 |
9 |
4 |
14 |
21 |
12 |
5 |
18 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
146 |
FS/PPR |
9 |
9 |
11 |
27 |
19 |
11 |
5 |
16 |
21 |
14 |
6 |
22 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
183 |
Opp |
@ den
|
@ buf
|
pit
|
@ lac
|
gb
|
ne
|
@ chi
|
@ det
|
nyg
|
nyj
|
@ mia
|
kc
|
bye
|
min
|
lac
|
@ kc
|
@ ind
|
den
|
|
|
|
2022 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
72% |
64% |
89% |
81% |
- |
80% |
55% |
69% |
79% |
80% |
79% |
75% |
83% |
75% |
81% |
67% |
71% |
75% |
rshYds |
57
|
69
|
66
|
144
|
154
|
-
|
143
|
43
|
67
|
78
|
109
|
229
|
144
|
99
|
93
|
44
|
69
|
45
|
1653 |
rushes |
10
|
19
|
13
|
28
|
21
|
-
|
20
|
10
|
17
|
21
|
24
|
33
|
26
|
27
|
22
|
15
|
17
|
17
|
340 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
12 |
recYds |
16
|
12
|
31
|
31
|
39
|
-
|
12
|
11
|
20
|
28
|
51
|
74
|
6
|
15
|
17
|
6
|
26
|
5
|
400 |
Tar/Rec |
1/1 |
1/1 |
5/5 |
6/5 |
5/5 |
- |
4/3 |
4/2 |
3/3 |
8/6 |
4/3 |
7/6 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
3/2 |
1/1 |
5/4 |
3/2 |
64/53 |
TM Tar% |
- |
3% |
14% |
20% |
22% |
- |
15% |
11% |
8% |
22% |
11% |
20% |
7% |
0% |
9% |
3% |
16% |
16% |
13% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
7 |
8 |
9 |
29 |
25 |
0 |
33 |
5 |
8 |
16 |
16 |
42 |
21 |
17 |
11 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
277 |
FS/PPR |
8 |
9 |
14 |
34 |
30 |
0 |
36 |
7 |
11 |
22 |
19 |
48 |
23 |
19 |
13 |
6 |
19 |
7 |
330 |
Opp |
@ lac
|
ari
|
@ ten
|
den
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
hou
|
@ no
|
@ jac
|
ind
|
@ den
|
@ sea
|
lac
|
@ lar
|
ne
|
@ pit
|
sf
|
kc
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
52% |
- |
- |
63% |
69% |
64% |
36% |
- |
49% |
57% |
66% |
66% |
85% |
75% |
65% |
70% |
61% |
71% |
63% |
rshYds |
34
|
-
|
-
|
40
|
48
|
53
|
29
|
-
|
76
|
16
|
37
|
87
|
52
|
24
|
52
|
129
|
63
|
132
|
872 |
rushes |
10
|
-
|
-
|
13
|
15
|
16
|
6
|
-
|
13
|
7
|
9
|
22
|
13
|
9
|
15
|
27
|
16
|
26
|
217 |
rshTDs |
2
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
9 |
recYds |
6
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
19
|
29
|
39
|
-
|
19
|
20
|
24
|
25
|
38
|
46
|
42
|
-5
|
17
|
12
|
348 |
Tar/Rec |
2/1 |
- |
- |
5/5 |
5/4 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
- |
4/4 |
5/5 |
7/5 |
4/2 |
9/9 |
6/5 |
4/3 |
3/1 |
4/4 |
2/2 |
64/54 |
TM Tar% |
4% |
- |
- |
16% |
15% |
4% |
9% |
- |
10% |
15% |
28% |
11% |
25% |
14% |
11% |
12% |
13% |
13% |
13% |
recTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
16 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
14 |
12 |
0 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
17 |
15 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
14 |
20 |
176 |
FS/PPR |
17 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
16 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
13 |
8 |
11 |
19 |
24 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
18 |
22 |
230 |
Opp |
bal
|
@ pit
|
mia
|
@ lac
|
chi
|
@ den
|
phi
|
bye
|
@ nyg
|
kc
|
cin
|
@ dal
|
was
|
@ kc
|
@ cle
|
den
|
@ ind
|
lac
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | LVR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
78% |
66% |
59% |
68% |
64% |
- |
49% |
67% |
56% |
60% |
75% |
60% |
- |
43% |
68% |
50% |
55% |
61% |
rshYds |
93
|
88
|
71
|
48
|
77
|
-
|
17
|
129
|
65
|
112
|
55
|
27
|
-
|
49
|
76
|
69
|
89
|
1065 |
rushes |
25
|
27
|
16
|
15
|
23
|
-
|
10
|
31
|
14
|
21
|
17
|
7
|
-
|
13
|
26
|
13
|
15
|
273 |
rshTDs |
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
12 |
recYds |
46
|
17
|
12
|
25
|
8
|
-
|
14
|
0
|
3
|
24
|
9
|
17
|
-
|
25
|
38
|
0
|
0
|
238 |
Tar/Rec |
6/4 |
3/3 |
4/3 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
- |
4/3 |
1/0 |
1/1 |
4/4 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
- |
5/3 |
3/3 |
2/0 |
1/0 |
45/33 |
TM Tar% |
21% |
9% |
13% |
9% |
10% |
- |
11% |
5% |
4% |
18% |
3% |
8% |
- |
11% |
10% |
7% |
3% |
10% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
31 |
10 |
8 |
7 |
20 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
12 |
25 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
7 |
17 |
6 |
20 |
202 |
FS/PPR |
35 |
13 |
11 |
10 |
22 |
0 |
6 |
12 |
13 |
29 |
13 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
6 |
20 |
235 |
Opp |
@ car
|
no
|
@ ne
|
buf
|
@ kc
|
bye
|
tb
|
@ cle
|
@ lac
|
den
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
@ nyj
|
ind
|
lac
|
mia
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
Josh Jacobs 2023 Outlook
Jacobs was always capable of leading the league in rushing someday; that he accomplished it in Year 4 with the Las Vegas Raiders wasn’t exactly surprising. For Jacobs to average nearly 100 yards per game and play with the league’s leading receiver in Davante Adams isn’t the most impressive part, either. It’s that Jacobs could so quickly bounce back from a mediocre (by his standards) 2021 season when he posted just 872 yards, or 58.1 per game. Of course, you have to chalk much of that up to the scheme. Josh McDaniels may have gotten off to a brutal start in take two of his head-coaching career, but the offensive schemes he runs are set up to squeeze the most out of his best weapons. You want Jacobs, a 220-pound bowling ball, running north and not east-west. The best part about owning Jacobs in fantasy is his gigantic workload. His 340 attempts in 2022 were nearly 80 percent of the Raiders’ total attempts as a team. Has-beens like Brandon Bolden and Ameer Abdullah barely made a dent in the carries and, quite frankly, won’t be on the roster much longer.
Josh Jacobs 2022 Outlook
The Raiders announced in April they were not picking up Jacobs' fifth-year option, which would have carried a price tag for 2023 of $8.034 million. ... Although he's rushed for 3,087 yards and 28 touchdowns while averaging 4.2 yards per carry and catching 107 passes for 752 yards in three seasons, his rushing totals have diminished in each of his three seasons. Along with Jacobs, the Raiders return Kenyan Drake at running back, though Drake is returning from a season-ending ankle injury that came in Week 13. Las Vegas also signed a pair of former New England Patriots in Brandon Bolden and Jakob Johnson, as well as NFL veteran Ameer Abdullah. Then the Raiders drafted a pair of running backs on Day 3, taking Georgia's Zamir White in the fourth round and UCLA's Brittain Brown in the seventh round with new GM Dave Ziegler noting there are differing roles to be filled and all the backs will compete for playing time. That said, as Pro Football Focus pointed out, "Jacobs has been as advertised since entering the league in 2019, with his 90.8 rushing grade being the sixth-best mark among rushers with at least 100 carries. His 0.24 missed tackles forced per rushing attempt is tied for fourth, and his 77 explosive rushes rank sixth." Even assuming a competition is coming, it's fair to believe the Raiders, with no worries about a long-term commitment, will feel comfortable using Jacobs heavily.
Josh Jacobs 2021 Outlook
The Raiders already had a certifiable No. 1 running back, a Pro Bowler with a pair of 1,000-yard rushing seasons to begin his NFL career. Jacobs was a first-round pick in 2019 and is seemingly still on his ascent. So why would the defensively-deficient Raiders feel the need to add another potential RB1 in free agency and pay Kenyan Drake like a starter? Because Jacobs -- again, the unquestioned lead back -- has base salaries totaling more than $3.7 million the next two seasons (though Drake has more than $11.9 million in guaranteed money in his Raiders contract). So, there is no running back controversy in Sin City. But ESPN.com notes that Jacobs has slowed down the stretch in his first two seasons, missing three of the Raiders' last four games with a shoulder fracture as a rookie and then averaging almost a full yard less per carry last season than he did in 2019, 4.8-3.9. Consider Drake, then, an expensive insurance policy -- and a much more capable pass catcher than Jacobs. As ESPN's Matthew Berry noted, Jacobs needs two things to keep his fantasy value high: volume and scoring. With Drake on board, both things are in question this season.
| | | |