| 2020 Stats | PIT | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
58% |
48% |
61% |
- |
71% |
66% |
23% |
19% |
19% |
38% |
28% |
33% |
54% |
81% |
42% |
26% |
45% |
44% |
| recYds |
34
|
22
|
36
|
-
|
25
|
68
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
30
|
12
|
19
|
80
|
29
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
392 |
| Tar/Rec |
3/2 |
5/3 |
7/5 |
- |
4/3 |
7/4 |
- |
- |
2/1 |
2/2 |
3/1 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
6/3 |
- |
3/2 |
- |
49/30 |
| TM Tar% |
10% |
12% |
20% |
- |
12% |
32% |
0% |
0% |
4% |
4% |
7% |
0% |
8% |
17% |
0% |
6% |
0% |
8% |
| recTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
5 |
| FScore |
9 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
69 |
| FS/PPR |
11 |
5 |
8 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
16 |
11 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
99 |
| Opp |
@ nyg
|
den
|
hou
|
bye
|
phi
|
cle
|
ten
|
@ bal
|
@ dal
|
cin
|
@ jac
|
bal
|
was
|
@ buf
|
@ cin
|
ind
|
@ cle
|
|
|
| |
| 2019 Stats | PIT | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| recYds |
51
|
23
|
14
|
-
|
52
|
-
|
-
|
21
|
69
|
90
|
49
|
98
|
111
|
33
|
83
|
41
|
-
|
735 |
| Tar/Rec |
6/2 |
3/2 |
5/2 |
- |
6/3 |
- |
- |
6/1 |
4/4 |
7/6 |
5/3 |
7/3 |
4/4 |
4/4 |
11/5 |
8/5 |
- |
76/44 |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
3 |
| FScore |
5 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
15 |
4 |
15 |
17 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
91 |
| FS/PPR |
7 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
21 |
7 |
18 |
21 |
7 |
13 |
9 |
0 |
135 |
| Opp |
@ nyg
|
den
|
hou
|
@ ten
|
phi
|
cle
|
@ bal
|
bye
|
@ dal
|
cin
|
@ jac
|
bal
|
was
|
@ buf
|
@ cin
|
ind
|
@ cle
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | PIT | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
13% |
80% |
61% |
75% |
57% |
22% |
- |
- |
86% |
79% |
54% |
23% |
- |
37% |
69% |
36% |
72% |
54% |
| recYds |
-
|
14
|
25
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
-
|
11
|
0
|
-
|
11
|
65
|
0
|
64
|
217 |
| Tar/Rec |
- |
5/1 |
2/2 |
4/2 |
2/0 |
1/0 |
- |
- |
5/2 |
- |
3/1 |
3/0 |
- |
4/2 |
4/3 |
2/0 |
3/3 |
38/16 |
| TM Tar% |
0% |
8% |
5% |
9% |
0% |
0% |
- |
- |
11% |
0% |
7% |
0% |
- |
11% |
12% |
0% |
7% |
6% |
| recTDs |
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
0 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
27 |
| FS/PPR |
0 |
8 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
43 |
| Opp |
@ cle
|
kc
|
@ tb
|
bal
|
atl
|
@ cin
|
bye
|
cle
|
@ bal
|
car
|
@ jac
|
@ den
|
lac
|
@ oak
|
ne
|
@ no
|
cin
|
|
|
| |
James Washington 2019 Outlook
As SBNation.com recently suggested, if Antonio Brown had not forced his way off the team this offseason, Washington would probably be fighting to keep his role as the Steelers’ third wide receiver (and Donte Moncrief would be playing for another team). But that is not the hand Pittsburgh was dealt. Instead, Washington and Moncrief will battle for the second spot opposite JuJu Smith-Schuster, a fight that will likely take most of training camp to be decided, and one that could perhaps become a three-way contest if third-round draft pick Diontae Johnson can make an early impact with the coaching staff. The reality of replacing a player like Brown should mean that all three players will see playing time as the game script dictates (the Steelers threw the ball 689 times in 2018), but someone has to be listed at the top of the depth chart across from Smith-Schuster when the regular season begins. If Washington has further developed his route tree and retained the strength that he showed in college (and he improves his catch rate), the Steelers could give him a chance to demonstrate his big-play ability as their No. 2 receiver.
| | |
