• Career Stats
    RushingReceiving
    YearGPRrsh/ydsaveTDsrec/ydsaveTDsFSV
    202014 50 2/3 1.5 0 48/621 12.9 6 146
    201913 46 10/93 9.3 0 68/709 10.4 3 166
    201812 55 3/35 11.7 0 43/590 13.7 3 124
  • (Month:Week)
2020 Stats | ARIWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 77% 61% - 63% 59% 81% 79% - 64% 74% 91% 86% 94% 84% 85% 83% - 77%
rshYds 0 3 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 3
rushes 0 1 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 - 2
rshTDs 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0
recYds 0 57 - 19 78 86 37 - 123 27 50 19 2 14 33 76 - 621
Tar/Rec 5/1 4/2 - 5/3 7/5 3/2 8/5 - 8/5 6/4 6/4 6/3 3/1 4/3 4/3 10/7 - 79/48
TM Tar% 14% 13% - 16% 20% 15% 19% - 31% 19% 15% 18% 8% 13% 11% 22% - 17%
recTDs 0 0 - 1 0 2 2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 6
FScore 0 6 0 7 7 20 15 0 18 2 5 1 0 1 3 7 0 98
FS/PPR 1 8 0 10 12 22 20 0 23 6 9 4 1 4 6 14 0 146
Opp @ sf was det @ car @ nyj @ dal sea bye mia buf @ sea @ ne lar @ nyg phi sf @ lar  
 
2019 Stats | ARIWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
rshYds 12 0 0 6 - - - 19 8 0 1 - 0 4 28 9 6 93
rushes 1 0 0 1 - - - 1 1 0 1 - 0 1 1 2 1 10
rshTDs 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0
recYds 32 114 59 37 - - - 79 8 138 41 - 23 85 33 0 60 709
Tar/Rec 12/4 8/6 12/10 5/4 - - - 11/8 5/2 10/6 9/6 - 7/3 9/8 5/4 5/0 10/7 108/68
recTDs 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 3 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 3
FScore 4 11 5 4 0 0 0 9 1 31 4 0 2 8 6 0 6 98
FS/PPR 8 17 15 8 0 0 0 17 3 37 10 0 5 16 10 0 13 166
Opp @ sf was det @ car @ nyj @ dal sea bye mia buf @ sea @ ne lar @ nyg phi sf @ lar  
 
2018 Stats | ARIWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 85% 69% 74% 67% 63% 79% 79% 76% - 89% 89% 91% 85% - - - - 79%
rshYds 0 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 23 - - - - 35
rushes 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 - - - - 3
rshTDs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0
recYds 4 27 90 28 85 77 57 42 - 8 77 41 54 - - - - 590
Tar/Rec 2/1 5/4 8/7 5/4 4/3 7/6 6/3 7/3 - 6/2 4/3 6/4 8/3 - - - - 68/43
TM Tar% 6% 19% 32% 28% 22% 23% 17% 20% - 16% 22% 38% 33% - - - - 21%
recTDs 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 - 0 1 0 0 - - - - 3
FScore 0 2 9 3 15 7 5 10 0 0 13 4 7 0 0 0 0 80
FS/PPR 1 6 16 7 18 13 8 13 0 2 16 8 10 0 0 0 0 123
Opp was @ lar chi sea @ sf @ min den sf bye @ kc oak @ lac @ gb det @ atl lar @ sea  
 

Christian Kirk 2020 Outlook
The Cardinals receivers’ room had a sea change when DeAndre Hopkins arrived. Its impact on Kirk will be interesting to watch, after his self-described "frustrating" 2019 season in which he battled ankle issues nearly all season. But Kirk said despite playing in pain he still made progress, and he is anxious to see himself within an offense loaded with promise behind quarterback Kyler Murray. "It'll be a little bit of pick your poison," Kirk said. "It's going to be fun." Sure, but will Kirk be among those having the fun? With Hopkins now around and Larry Fitzgerald coming back for another season, ESPN's Matthew Berry worries about Kirk getting enough looks. Hopkins was second in target share (28.8 percent), third in receptions per game and fourth in targets per game last season. The Cardinals didn't land him to play a complementary role. Meanwhile, Kirk had five games last season with fewer than seven targets. In those games, he had zero touchdowns and averaged merely 5.6 fantasy points per game and just over 20 yards per game. FantasyPros pointed out that over the last 10 NFL seasons, of the 338 wide receivers who've seen at least 100 targets, 291 of them were able to finish as top-36 fantasy options. That's an 86.1 percent success-rate. Those who failed to do that in 2019: Dede Westbrook; Kirk; and Fitzgerald. Don't overpay.

Christian Kirk 2019 Outlook
As CBSSports.com suggested, given Larry Fitzgerald's age (36 in August), there's an excellent chance Kirk becomes the No. 1 receiver for the Cardinals in 2019. The versatile Kirk is an inside or outside receiver who produces yards after the catch, has great speed, boasts solid route-running skills and displays good hands. He proved to be dynamic (and productive) in his rookie campaign. This year, there's a new offense, run by a new offensive-minded HC (Kliff Kingsbury) with a new QB (Kyler Murray). On the whole, this should be a much-improved offense that will be forced to throw the ball a lot because of game scripts. Indeed, that's probably the way Kingsbury wants to run his offense anyway. As Fansided.com's Avery Duncan put it, "[Kingsbury’s] offense is about as aggressive as a ten-year-old playing 'Madden.'" Remember: Murray is well-known for his time and success at Oklahoma, but Murray spent his freshman year at Texas A&M. Though he played just one season for the Aggies, Kirk and Murray were freshmen teammates, and Murray threw his first college touchdown pass to the now-Cardinal receiver. So, yes, Fitzgerald is still there, and the team added Andy Isabella and Hakeem Butler in April's draft (and of course David Johnson will chip in, too), but Kirk could return great value if drafted in this range.