2023 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
20% |
22% |
- |
37% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
26% |
rshYds |
-
|
-
|
13
|
12
|
-
|
47
|
31
|
55
|
38
|
32
|
36
|
22
|
48
|
27
|
8
|
11
|
31
|
0
|
411 |
rushes |
-
|
-
|
5
|
5
|
-
|
12
|
10
|
14
|
14
|
10
|
12
|
7
|
12
|
10
|
7
|
7
|
10
|
0
|
135 |
rshTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
9 |
recYds |
-
|
-
|
22
|
0
|
-
|
24
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
12
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
84 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
3/2 |
0/0 |
- |
3/3 |
1/0 |
1/1 |
1/0 |
0/0 |
3/3 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
4/2 |
1/0 |
1/1 |
21/15 |
TM Tar% |
- |
- |
10% |
0% |
- |
10% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6% |
recTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
15 |
12 |
9 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
9 |
2 |
7 |
9 |
0 |
103 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
16 |
15 |
13 |
9 |
9 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
9 |
9 |
1 |
118 |
Opp |
cin
|
@ pit
|
ten
|
bal
|
bye
|
sf
|
@ ind
|
@ sea
|
ari
|
@ bal
|
pit
|
@ den
|
@ lar
|
jac
|
chi
|
@ hou
|
nyj
|
@ cin
|
|
|
|
2022 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
46% |
44% |
49% |
49% |
43% |
47% |
46% |
- |
36% |
43% |
41% |
38% |
39% |
26% |
47% |
32% |
25% |
41% |
rshYds |
46
|
58
|
47
|
49
|
47
|
12
|
4
|
42
|
-
|
9
|
32
|
15
|
56
|
6
|
24
|
8
|
0
|
13
|
468 |
rushes |
11
|
13
|
12
|
10
|
11
|
4
|
5
|
11
|
-
|
6
|
5
|
5
|
9
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
2
|
4
|
123 |
rshTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
recYds |
24
|
16
|
14
|
19
|
10
|
0
|
4
|
30
|
-
|
10
|
22
|
6
|
18
|
6
|
3
|
14
|
-1
|
15
|
210 |
Tar/Rec |
4/4 |
2/2 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
3/3 |
1/0 |
2/1 |
4/4 |
- |
1/1 |
2/2 |
2/1 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
1/1 |
4/3 |
44/35 |
TM Tar% |
- |
8% |
13% |
9% |
10% |
3% |
8% |
20% |
- |
3% |
5% |
6% |
16% |
10% |
4% |
11% |
7% |
7% |
8% |
recTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
FScore |
19 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
11 |
1 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
-1 |
2 |
91 |
FS/PPR |
23 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
14 |
1 |
7 |
11 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
126 |
Opp |
@ car
|
nyj
|
pit
|
@ atl
|
lac
|
ne
|
@ bal
|
cin
|
bye
|
@ mia
|
@ buf
|
tb
|
@ hou
|
@ cin
|
bal
|
no
|
@ was
|
@ pit
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
47% |
38% |
41% |
53% |
44% |
69% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
38% |
- |
20% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
44% |
rshYds |
33
|
51
|
81
|
69
|
61
|
66
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
386 |
rushes |
6
|
13
|
10
|
14
|
12
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
78 |
rshTDs |
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5 |
recYds |
28
|
2
|
74
|
17
|
28
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
13
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
174 |
Tar/Rec |
3/3 |
1/1 |
7/6 |
4/2 |
6/5 |
3/3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1/0 |
- |
2/2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
27/22 |
TM Tar% |
12% |
5% |
27% |
13% |
21% |
11% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3% |
- |
7% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
FScore |
12 |
5 |
21 |
14 |
20 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
86 |
FS/PPR |
15 |
6 |
27 |
16 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
108 |
Opp |
@ kc
|
hou
|
chi
|
@ min
|
@ lac
|
ari
|
den
|
pit
|
@ cin
|
@ ne
|
det
|
@ bal
|
bye
|
bal
|
lvr
|
@ gb
|
@ pit
|
cin
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
49% |
34% |
46% |
35% |
70% |
53% |
90% |
86% |
- |
58% |
54% |
42% |
49% |
47% |
33% |
43% |
56% |
52% |
rshYds |
72
|
86
|
46
|
71
|
72
|
40
|
76
|
66
|
-
|
104
|
11
|
62
|
33
|
33
|
21
|
11
|
37
|
841 |
rushes |
13
|
10
|
16
|
11
|
20
|
13
|
18
|
14
|
-
|
19
|
13
|
10
|
14
|
6
|
7
|
4
|
10
|
198 |
rshTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
6 |
recYds |
9
|
15
|
18
|
0
|
21
|
17
|
26
|
7
|
-
|
28
|
10
|
0
|
24
|
77
|
7
|
41
|
4
|
304 |
Tar/Rec |
6/4 |
2/2 |
3/2 |
0/0 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
- |
4/3 |
1/1 |
2/0 |
3/3 |
7/6 |
3/3 |
5/3 |
1/1 |
51/38 |
TM Tar% |
18% |
10% |
14% |
0% |
11% |
12% |
15% |
13% |
- |
22% |
6% |
8% |
10% |
16% |
10% |
10% |
4% |
11% |
recTDs |
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5 |
FScore |
8 |
22 |
12 |
19 |
15 |
5 |
16 |
7 |
0 |
13 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
23 |
2 |
11 |
4 |
180 |
FS/PPR |
12 |
24 |
14 |
19 |
18 |
7 |
19 |
9 |
0 |
16 |
9 |
6 |
8 |
29 |
5 |
14 |
5 |
218 |
Opp |
@ bal
|
cin
|
was
|
@ dal
|
ind
|
@ pit
|
@ cin
|
lvr
|
bye
|
hou
|
phi
|
@ jac
|
@ ten
|
bal
|
@ nyg
|
@ nyj
|
pit
|
|
|
|
Kareem Hunt 2023 Outlook
Hunt requested a trade from the Cleveland Browns last August, was denied and played out one of the least memorable seasons of his career. Despite appearing in all 17 games as an RB2 complementing Nick Chubb, Hunt scored just four total touchdowns; he posted two in Week 1 and the other two between Weeks 2-18. After finding the end zone twice in that season opener against Carolina, Hunt only cracked eight fantasy points in a game once the rest of the year. Once an exciting prospect who earned Pro Bowl recognition as a rookie, Hunt has never been able to replicate his career highs of 1,327 rushing yards and eight rushing scores from his debut season with the Kansas City Chiefs. It’s been a mixture of injuries, league discipline and a shared workload holding Hunt back. He’ll only be 28 when the 2023 season begins, but unless and until training camp injuries happen, very few teams would figure to be in the market for a veteran running back who can shoulder a real share of the carries, which is Hunt’s only path to fantasy relevance going forward.
Kareem Hunt 2022 Outlook
As SBNation.com pointed out, the NFL has evolved over the years to become a passing-dominant league and running backs have subsequently fallen out of favor across the land. Except, of course, in Cleveland where the Browns currently boast a running back room that is the envy of the other 31 teams. ... The unquestioned leader of the group is Nick Chubb, who established himself as one of the top three running backs in the league. His role on the team is fully set and unquestioned. But Hunt's value to the offense was on full display last season when he missed nine games with injuries. Hunt takes Cleveland's offense to a different level given what he adds in the passing game, and the Browns were clearly not the same when he was out of the lineup. Of course, as 247Sports.com notes, once a running back hits 26 the injury bug and reduction in production can start to occur. This is something a smart front office will be aware of (and which will likely shape his longer-term future with the club). But heading into 2022, fantasy managers might want to use last year's downtime -- and the resulting diminished totals -- to reap some value, especially in an offense that's likely to be at least somewhat pass heavier with the additions of Deshaun Watson and Amari Cooper.
Kareem Hunt 2021 Outlook
Last season, which was our first seeing a full year of Hunt with Cleveland, he made his presence felt, both on the ground and as a pass-catcher. As Fansided.com notes, in addition to posting 841 rushing yards (mostly spelling Nick Chubb), Hunt's ability to confound defenders was often on display, via both pure power and his make-you-miss prowess. He had six rushing touchdowns as well, further proving his impact on games when given the opportunity to shine on the ground. Additionally, Hunt is a highly capable pass-catching option for Baker Mayfield, which aids the Browns' efforts in moving the chains and in the red zone, as he demonstrated with five receiving touchdowns in 2020. Fansided believes we should see more of that sort of thing from Hunt this season via check-downs, option routes and screens. And, of course, we could see more in general. With the NFL moving to 17 games, the Browns (and the rest of the league) are going to need to rely on multiple backs more than ever going forward. That could lead to more consistent week-to-week production for Hunt even if he merely continues with his change-of-pace role.
| | | |