2023 Stats | NYJ | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
50% |
36% |
25% |
25% |
17% |
14% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
27% |
rshYds |
33
|
7
|
18
|
16
|
23
|
12
|
-
|
5
|
7
|
26
|
13
|
2
|
35
|
13
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
214 |
rushes |
13
|
4
|
8
|
5
|
6
|
3
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
9
|
7
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
recYds |
26
|
5
|
11
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
11
|
-5
|
6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
78 |
Tar/Rec |
3/3 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
- |
0/0 |
2/1 |
1/0 |
1/0 |
3/2 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
- |
20/15 |
TM Tar% |
18% |
4% |
11% |
3% |
0% |
4% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
FScore |
5 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
FS/PPR |
8 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
Opp |
buf
|
@ dal
|
ne
|
kc
|
@ den
|
phi
|
bye
|
@ nyg
|
lac
|
@ lvr
|
@ buf
|
mia
|
atl
|
hou
|
@ mia
|
was
|
@ cle
|
@ ne
|
|
|
|
2022 Stats | MIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
69% |
61% |
62% |
57% |
87% |
- |
76% |
86% |
84% |
60% |
86% |
75% |
85% |
86% |
79% |
59% |
34% |
72% |
rshYds |
90
|
17
|
96
|
76
|
94
|
77
|
-
|
111
|
47
|
119
|
72
|
42
|
86
|
23
|
95
|
64
|
27
|
37
|
1173 |
rushes |
20
|
6
|
17
|
20
|
18
|
13
|
-
|
20
|
17
|
14
|
11
|
22
|
20
|
15
|
17
|
14
|
9
|
11
|
264 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8 |
recYds |
18
|
19
|
0
|
10
|
27
|
6
|
-
|
30
|
9
|
27
|
0
|
14
|
-3
|
13
|
95
|
13
|
17
|
0
|
295 |
Tar/Rec |
5/3 |
6/4 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
1/1 |
- |
6/5 |
6/2 |
5/3 |
1/0 |
5/4 |
3/2 |
2/1 |
4/4 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
1/1 |
56/39 |
TM Tar% |
- |
13% |
0% |
6% |
5% |
4% |
- |
19% |
16% |
10% |
4% |
14% |
9% |
5% |
8% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
FScore |
10 |
3 |
15 |
8 |
24 |
14 |
0 |
20 |
11 |
20 |
7 |
5 |
14 |
9 |
25 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
206 |
FS/PPR |
13 |
7 |
15 |
10 |
26 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
13 |
23 |
7 |
9 |
16 |
10 |
29 |
10 |
6 |
4 |
245 |
Opp |
gb
|
@ phi
|
det
|
@ no
|
chi
|
@ mia
|
bye
|
ari
|
@ was
|
@ buf
|
dal
|
ne
|
nyj
|
@ det
|
ind
|
nyg
|
@ gb
|
@ chi
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | MIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
71% |
77% |
- |
49% |
- |
74% |
- |
71% |
80% |
82% |
76% |
53% |
- |
- |
89% |
- |
54% |
54% |
70% |
rshYds |
61
|
131
|
-
|
34
|
-
|
140
|
-
|
78
|
110
|
94
|
86
|
39
|
-
|
205
|
89
|
-
|
13
|
79
|
1159 |
rushes |
20
|
22
|
-
|
9
|
-
|
29
|
-
|
18
|
17
|
24
|
22
|
10
|
-
|
27
|
28
|
-
|
9
|
14
|
249 |
rshTDs |
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
6 |
recYds |
43
|
17
|
-
|
10
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
0
|
12
|
24
|
29
|
64
|
-
|
17
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
3
|
224 |
Tar/Rec |
7/6 |
3/2 |
- |
6/2 |
- |
2/2 |
- |
2/0 |
3/3 |
5/3 |
4/3 |
7/6 |
- |
3/1 |
3/2 |
- |
3/3 |
1/1 |
49/34 |
TM Tar% |
16% |
10% |
- |
17% |
- |
4% |
- |
6% |
11% |
15% |
12% |
22% |
- |
- |
14% |
- |
8% |
8% |
12% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
FScore |
16 |
14 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
17 |
17 |
10 |
0 |
34 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
174 |
FS/PPR |
22 |
16 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
7 |
15 |
20 |
20 |
16 |
0 |
35 |
11 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
208 |
Opp |
@ cin
|
@ ari
|
sea
|
cle
|
det
|
@ car
|
bye
|
dal
|
@ bal
|
@ lac
|
gb
|
@ sf
|
@ det
|
pit
|
@ chi
|
lar
|
@ gb
|
chi
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | MIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
58% |
80% |
74% |
74% |
41% |
- |
- |
88% |
66% |
81% |
81% |
63% |
87% |
68% |
76% |
58% |
- |
71% |
rshYds |
50
|
63
|
181
|
130
|
65
|
-
|
-
|
163
|
206
|
96
|
115
|
61
|
120
|
102
|
132
|
73
|
-
|
1557 |
rushes |
12
|
14
|
22
|
27
|
17
|
-
|
-
|
30
|
22
|
30
|
27
|
18
|
32
|
22
|
24
|
15
|
-
|
312 |
rshTDs |
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
16 |
recYds |
-2
|
8
|
18
|
16
|
24
|
-
|
-
|
63
|
46
|
16
|
45
|
21
|
59
|
8
|
27
|
12
|
-
|
361 |
Tar/Rec |
2/1 |
2/2 |
5/2 |
2/2 |
5/5 |
- |
- |
3/2 |
2/2 |
4/4 |
5/5 |
4/4 |
9/6 |
4/2 |
5/5 |
2/2 |
- |
54/44 |
TM Tar% |
8% |
9% |
20% |
10% |
14% |
- |
- |
21% |
10% |
13% |
19% |
10% |
24% |
13% |
17% |
5% |
- |
14% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1 |
FScore |
16 |
13 |
25 |
26 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
37 |
11 |
22 |
8 |
17 |
17 |
21 |
14 |
0 |
293 |
FS/PPR |
17 |
15 |
27 |
28 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
39 |
15 |
27 |
12 |
23 |
19 |
26 |
16 |
0 |
337 |
Opp |
gb
|
@ ind
|
ten
|
@ hou
|
@ sea
|
atl
|
bye
|
@ gb
|
det
|
@ chi
|
dal
|
car
|
jac
|
@ tb
|
chi
|
@ no
|
@ det
|
|
|
|
Dalvin Cook 2023 Outlook
Let's put it this way: If you own Cook in a Dynasty league, you've already missed your window of opportunity to sell high. Cook was ranked far higher on this list one year ago, but his fantasy production has petered off to the point where he's no longer a RB1-level option in future drafts -- and that was before he was released by the Vikings the first week of June. Cook's prime clearly came and went in 2019 and 2020, two seasons in which he combined for 3,572 yards from scrimmage and 30 total touchdowns. In the two years since, his yards per carry and touchdowns per game have only dropped. Cook only cracked 12 fantasy points seven times in 2022. And before this season, he'll turn 28, which as we all know is 45 in running back years. Still, somebody is bound to bite on Cook at some point this summer. The Dolphins, whose reported interest dates back to before Cook’s release, and the Broncos have been mentioned as possible landing spots. While fantasy managers could easily make out with a speculative selection, knowing where he’ll be playing would obviously be a huge plush.
Dalvin Cook 2022 Outlook
As NFL.com recently pointed out, Cook ranked in the top five in runs over 10-plus yards and 20-plus yards and in the top 10 in rush yards over expected last season. But at this stage of every back's career, there are questions about whether the workload is begging to take its toll. He earned 249 carries in 2021 after 312 in 2020 and 250 in 2019. The load could be catching up soon for the Pro Bowler. Meanwhile, with Kevin O'Connell on hand as the head coach, offensive coordinator Wes Phillips won't be calling the plays for the Vikings in 2022 but he recently shared some insight into what the team's approach is going to look like on that side of the ball. One area that Phillips touched on was running the football. "The running game is important, but I would say that winning the game is most important," Phillips said. "You're going to play some teams who, scheme-wise, they make it very difficult to run based on their personnel and their scheme. ..." As Profootballtalk.com suggests, with Cook on hand, the Vikings aren't likely to be abandoning the run at a drop of a hat but the way they handle getting him the ball may look a bit different than it did under the previous regime.
Dalvin Cook 2021 Outlook
There's no denying the production. Beyond the high-end totals, FantasyPros notes that Alvin Kamara (six) and Cook (four) were the only running backs who scored more than three touchdowns in a game in 2020. Cook also tied Derrick Henry for the league lead with 78 broken tackles. But, as NFL.com noted, the history for running backs a year after taking 300-plus carries isn't pretty. Whether Cook can follow Henry's lead and improve despite a hefty workload will be a big question for Minnesota entering the new season. A new offensive coordinator will take over for the Vikings, but with HC Mike Zimmer tapping Klint Kubiak for the job, the son of retiring incumbent Gary Kubiak probably won’t change the scheme substantially. The Vikes, however, would like to lighten Cook's workload at least a bit this season. "I think it's important that we monitor Dalvin's workload as we go forward," Zimmer said. "But we need our best players in the game. Dalvin is not only one of our best players, but one of the best players in the NFL." Bottom line? It's hard to take a player with Cook's talent off the field. Fantasy managers should expect him to remain one of the few workhorses in the NFL again in 2021.
| | | |