| 2018 Stats | NOR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
5% |
9% |
11% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9% |
rshYds |
0
|
-1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
rushes |
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
| recYds |
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
| Tar/Rec |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1/1 |
| TM Tar% |
0% |
0% |
2% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
| FScore |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| FS/PPR |
0 |
-1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Opp |
cin
|
@ was
|
@ phi
|
hou
|
@ ne
|
@ nyj
|
buf
|
@ oak
|
bye
|
jac
|
ten
|
mia
|
@ jac
|
@ hou
|
dal
|
nyg
|
@ ten
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
- |
- |
9% |
1% |
- |
10% |
- |
24% |
1% |
- |
17% |
27% |
6% |
- |
10% |
3% |
27% |
12% |
rshYds |
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
21
|
-
|
12
|
0
|
-
|
26
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
-
|
11
|
94 |
rushes |
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
-
|
5
|
0
|
-
|
4
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
4
|
27 |
| rshTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1 |
| recYds |
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0 |
| Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
0/0 |
- |
- |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
- |
1/1 |
1/0 |
- |
- |
0/0 |
- |
0/0 |
2/1 |
| TM Tar% |
- |
- |
0% |
0% |
- |
0% |
- |
0% |
0% |
- |
4% |
6% |
0% |
- |
0% |
0% |
0% |
1% |
| recTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0 |
| FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
| FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
| Opp |
@ bal
|
@ nyj
|
ari
|
@ ne
|
@ lar
|
sf
|
@ mia
|
ne
|
@ sea
|
bye
|
@ cin
|
jac
|
@ oak
|
pit
|
cle
|
mia
|
@ nyj
|
|
|
| |
Jonathan Williams 2017 Outlook
The Bills' decision not to match the Patriots' two-year, $6.4 million offer sheet to restricted free-agent running back Mike Gillislee strengthens Buffalo's long-dominant division rival and strips the Bills of one of the league's most efficient running backs last season. The most likely replacement for Gillislee as the Bills' No. 2 running back is Williams, a fifth-round pick in 2016. Williams was active for 11 games as a rookie last season, rushing 27 times for 94 yards and one touchdown. Williams, who beat a DUI charge in June, could provide a short-yardage replacement for LeSean McCoy. The question is whether Williams, if given a heavier load of carries, can rival Gillislee's efficiency last season -- a league-best 5.7 yards per carry. But before fantasy owners bump up Williams' potential draft value this fall, consider the possibility that new addition Mike Tolbert could poach some short-yardage and goal-line carries. When signing Tolbert in March, the Bills emphasized Tolbert would be used as more than just a lead-blocking fullback, indicating that Tolbert could take some carries away from the other running backs on Buffalo's depth chart.
| |
