2023 Stats | NYJ | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
56% |
32% |
44% |
36% |
45% |
37% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
42% |
recYds |
-
|
-
|
9
|
1
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
19
|
11
|
6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
58 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
1/1 |
1/1 |
2/2 |
- |
- |
1/1 |
5/2 |
1/1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11/8 |
TM Tar% |
0% |
0% |
4% |
3% |
8% |
0% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3% |
recTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
Opp |
buf
|
@ dal
|
ne
|
kc
|
@ den
|
phi
|
bye
|
@ nyg
|
lac
|
@ lvr
|
@ buf
|
mia
|
atl
|
hou
|
@ mia
|
was
|
@ cle
|
@ ne
|
|
|
|
2022 Stats | NYJ | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
27% |
- |
35% |
44% |
69% |
78% |
61% |
63% |
53% |
- |
66% |
76% |
46% |
46% |
51% |
51% |
56% |
- |
53% |
recYds |
-
|
-
|
5
|
-
|
12
|
17
|
5
|
27
|
16
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
31
|
7
|
41
|
30
|
24
|
-
|
232 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
1/1 |
- |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
- |
- |
3/3 |
1/1 |
2/1 |
2/2 |
1/1 |
7/3 |
- |
27/21 |
TM Tar% |
0% |
- |
2% |
0% |
10% |
12% |
9% |
3% |
13% |
- |
0% |
11% |
2% |
5% |
6% |
3% |
16% |
- |
6% |
recTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
2 |
FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
16 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
35 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
18 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
56 |
Opp |
bal
|
@ cle
|
cin
|
@ pit
|
mia
|
@ gb
|
@ den
|
ne
|
buf
|
bye
|
@ ne
|
chi
|
@ min
|
@ buf
|
det
|
jac
|
@ sea
|
@ mia
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | CIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
74% |
73% |
70% |
83% |
84% |
69% |
83% |
86% |
64% |
- |
73% |
66% |
- |
87% |
79% |
64% |
90% |
- |
76% |
recYds |
35
|
4
|
-
|
95
|
16
|
15
|
91
|
33
|
24
|
-
|
9
|
9
|
20
|
56
|
18
|
36
|
32
|
64
|
557 |
Tar/Rec |
2/2 |
2/2 |
- |
6/5 |
2/2 |
3/3 |
3/3 |
4/4 |
5/4 |
- |
3/2 |
3/3 |
6/3 |
6/4 |
4/3 |
7/5 |
6/4 |
6/6 |
68/55 |
TM Tar% |
8% |
7% |
0% |
19% |
6% |
11% |
8% |
12% |
12% |
- |
11% |
14% |
- |
18% |
19% |
15% |
16% |
- |
12% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
-
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
6 |
FScore |
3 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
7 |
21 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
12 |
91 |
FS/PPR |
5 |
2 |
0 |
26 |
3 |
10 |
24 |
7 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
9 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
18 |
146 |
Opp |
@ car
|
ne
|
@ den
|
ten
|
@ atl
|
bye
|
@ ne
|
cin
|
@ ind
|
buf
|
mia
|
@ hou
|
phi
|
no
|
@ mia
|
jac
|
tb
|
@ buf
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | CIN | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
72% |
51% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
60% |
recYds |
45
|
42
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
87 |
Tar/Rec |
5/4 |
6/4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11/8 |
TM Tar% |
14% |
11% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12% |
recTDs |
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
FScore |
4 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
FS/PPR |
8 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
Opp |
lac
|
@ cle
|
@ phi
|
jac
|
@ bal
|
@ ind
|
cle
|
ten
|
bye
|
@ pit
|
@ was
|
nyg
|
@ mia
|
dal
|
pit
|
@ hou
|
bal
|
|
|
|
C.J. Uzomah 2022 Outlook
The Jets added at a position of need by agreeing to terms with former Bengal Uzomah. The journeyman, who gets a three-year, $24 million deal, is coming off a season where he set career highs in catches, yards and touchdowns. Although he is capable of lining up wide or in the slot, Uzomah spends most of his time with his hand in the dirt, working as an in-line tight end. He's no George Kittle, but he fits the Shanahan-styled scheme in New York and clearly represents an upgrade at the position. Indeed, Uzomah has shown some ability to be a vertical or big play threat as four of his five touchdowns last season came from outside the red zone and 2021 was his best in terms of generating yards after the catch. Still, in an offense already boasting youthful playmakers in Elijah Moore and Michael Carter, providing second-year QB Zach Wilson with a safety valve option seems like a solid enough move for the Jets. But is moving away from Joe Burrow and the currently higher-powered Cincy offense the best move from a fantasy perspective? With former Viking Tyler Conklin also signed, a greater role in a lesser offense seems like a push at best for Uzomah.
| | | |