• Career Stats
    RushingReceiving
    YearGPRrsh/ydsaveTDsrec/ydsaveTDsFSV
    202313 74 0/0 0.0 0 35/381 10.9 4 89
    202216 87 0/0 0.0 0 31/362 11.7 2 79
    202115 66 3/11 3.7 0 37/473 12.8 3 103
    202016 22 0/0 0.0 0 48/896 18.7 8 186
    201910 79 2/7 3.5 0 39/363 9.3 3 94
    201816 39 3/32 10.7 0 64/736 11.5 4 166
    201716 22 1/7 7.0 0 62/768 12.4 8 188
    201615 92 5/14 2.8 0 36/365 10.1 2 86
    201513 101 0/0 0.0 0 23/283 12.3 1 57
  • (Month:Week)
2023 Stats | BALWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 TOT
TM Snap % 38% 33% 72% 74% 59% 52% - - - - - - - - - - - - 54%
recYds - 63 39 4 64 40 12 - 2 - 37 21 - 32 - 10 18 39 381
Tar/Rec - 6/5 4/4 2/1 5/4 3/2 1/1 - 1/1 - 1/1 2/1 - 5/5 - 4/3 2/2 5/5 41/35
TM Tar% 0% 18% 14% 11% 14% 10% - - - - - - - - - - - - 14%
recTDs - 1 0 0 0 0 1 - 0 - 1 0 - 0 - 1 0 0 4
FScore 0 12 3 0 6 4 7 0 0 0 9 2 0 3 0 7 1 3 62
FS/PPR 0 17 7 1 10 6 8 0 1 0 10 3 0 8 0 10 3 8 97
Opp hou @ cin ind @ cle @ pit @ ten det @ ari sea cle cin @ lac bye lar @ jac @ sf mia pit  
 
2022 Stats | NWEWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 TOT
TM Snap % - 50% 76% 66% 12% - 6% 24% 33% - 59% 78% 56% 97% 83% 34% 45% 6% 48%
recYds 28 110 41 46 - - - 2 - - 18 65 17 32 3 - - - 362
Tar/Rec 5/3 6/6 3/2 4/3 - - - 1/1 - - 3/2 8/6 3/2 10/5 6/1 - - - 49/31
TM Tar% - 21% 10% 20% 0% - 0% 3% 0% - 11% 23% 9% 33% 21% 0% 0% 0% 10%
recTDs 0 1 0 0 - - - 0 - - 0 1 0 0 0 - - - 2
FScore 2 17 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 1 3 0 0 0 0 48
FS/PPR 5 23 6 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 18 3 8 1 0 0 0 79
Opp @ mia @ pit bal @ gb det @ cle chi @ nyj ind bye nyj @ min buf @ ari @ lvr cin mia @ buf  
 
2021 Stats | NWEWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 TOT
TM Snap % 85% 86% 81% 73% 67% 59% 57% 79% 87% 70% 77% 83% 49% - 47% - - 89% 73%
rshYds 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 - 0 0 0 6 - 0 - - 0 11
rushes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 - 0 - - 0 3
rshTDs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 - - 0 0
recYds 72 21 17 55 32 27 51 60 - 21 40 20 0 - 34 - - 23 473
Tar/Rec 7/5 3/3 8/2 5/3 4/3 4/1 5/2 6/3 - 4/2 5/5 3/3 1/0 - 6/4 - - 3/1 64/37
TM Tar% 18% 11% 16% 12% 14% 15% 13% 18% 0% 16% 19% 9% 33% - 14% - - 0% 13%
recTDs 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 0 1 0 0 - 0 - - 0 3
FScore 13 2 1 5 3 2 11 6 0 2 10 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 66
FS/PPR 18 5 3 8 6 3 13 9 0 4 15 5 0 0 7 0 0 3 103
Opp mia @ nyj no tb @ hou dal nyj @ lac @ car cle @ atl ten @ buf bye @ ind buf jac @ mia  
 
2020 Stats | LVRWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 19% 19% 85% 91% 79% - 78% 78% 84% 60% 75% 67% 67% 66% 84% 77% 64% 68%
recYds 23 19 32 44 67 - 107 - 55 8 88 54 38 100 49 155 57 896
Tar/Rec 1/1 1/1 3/2 4/4 2/2 - 9/5 - 3/2 4/1 9/6 6/5 11/4 9/5 8/4 6/5 4/1 80/48
TM Tar% 4% 3% 9% 9% 7% - 26% 0% 13% 18% 31% 16% 26% 20% 27% 20% 11% 16%
recTDs 1 0 0 1 1 - 1 - 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 8
FScore 8 1 3 10 12 0 16 0 11 0 14 5 3 16 4 21 5 137
FS/PPR 9 2 5 14 14 0 21 0 13 1 20 10 7 21 8 26 6 185
Opp @ car no @ ne buf @ kc bye tb @ cle @ lac den kc @ atl @ nyj ind lac mia @ den  
 

Nelson Agholor 2021 Outlook
It's easy to understand why the Patriots targeted a wide receiver like Agholor as part of their free agency maneuvering. According to NFL Next Gen Stats, New England finished the 2020 season averaging 0.9 yards per vertical route, second fewest in the NFL. Agholor's average of 2.8 yards per vertical route last season led the NFL. The Patriots needed a deep threat, and Agholor was one of the league's most efficient on those routes last season. So, if the Patriots were determined to sign a deep threat and they didn't want to pay the presumed premium for a higher-regarded wide receiver such as Kenny Golladay, then Agholor wasn't a bad choice. It also gave them a player who has shown a willingness to compete for his role. When Agholor joined the Raiders, he had plenty of competition: Tyrell Williams, Zay Jones, Hunter Renfrow, and rookies Henry Ruggs and Bryan Edwards. (Ruggs and Jones, in particular, had similar skill sets to Agholor -- and Ruggs was the top receiver selected in the 2020 draft.) Even so, Agholor emerged to play 67.5 percent of the Raiders’ offensive snaps. It was a similar story during his time in Philly. So it's worth noting the path to workload is clearer in New England.