| 2020 Stats | PIT | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
62% |
77% |
75% |
- |
77% |
71% |
84% |
87% |
86% |
85% |
93% |
68% |
80% |
67% |
15% |
81% |
- |
74% |
| recYds |
18
|
43
|
52
|
-
|
43
|
9
|
50
|
48
|
22
|
38
|
36
|
54
|
68
|
30
|
-
|
47
|
-
|
558 |
| Tar/Rec |
2/1 |
5/3 |
7/5 |
- |
6/5 |
4/2 |
8/6 |
5/4 |
6/3 |
6/2 |
7/4 |
11/7 |
11/7 |
5/2 |
- |
7/5 |
- |
90/56 |
| TM Tar% |
6% |
12% |
20% |
- |
18% |
18% |
17% |
17% |
13% |
13% |
15% |
0% |
21% |
14% |
0% |
14% |
- |
14% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
5 |
| FScore |
1 |
4 |
11 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
8 |
3 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
85 |
| FS/PPR |
2 |
7 |
16 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
11 |
14 |
11 |
5 |
13 |
12 |
13 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
141 |
| Opp |
@ nyg
|
den
|
hou
|
bye
|
phi
|
cle
|
ten
|
@ bal
|
@ dal
|
cin
|
@ jac
|
bal
|
was
|
@ buf
|
@ cin
|
ind
|
@ cle
|
|
|
| |
| 2019 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| recYds |
8
|
25
|
47
|
48
|
8
|
-
|
70
|
26
|
16
|
56
|
27
|
44
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
375 |
| Tar/Rec |
3/1 |
4/3 |
4/3 |
5/1 |
4/1 |
- |
5/4 |
4/3 |
2/2 |
12/5 |
4/4 |
5/4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
52/31 |
| recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3 |
| FScore |
0 |
8 |
4 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
| FS/PPR |
1 |
11 |
7 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
17 |
5 |
3 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
86 |
| Opp |
@ nyg
|
den
|
hou
|
@ ten
|
phi
|
cle
|
@ bal
|
bye
|
@ dal
|
cin
|
@ jac
|
bal
|
was
|
@ buf
|
@ cin
|
ind
|
@ cle
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
45% |
28% |
88% |
83% |
71% |
71% |
50% |
22% |
- |
38% |
40% |
71% |
76% |
67% |
53% |
30% |
49% |
56% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
-9
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-8 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| recYds |
51
|
26
|
33
|
40
|
105
|
71
|
31
|
37
|
-
|
69
|
0
|
45
|
81
|
65
|
8
|
28
|
60
|
750 |
| Tar/Rec |
5/4 |
4/3 |
11/5 |
10/5 |
15/9 |
7/4 |
7/3 |
3/3 |
- |
3/3 |
0/0 |
7/5 |
16/10 |
8/4 |
3/1 |
5/3 |
6/4 |
110/66 |
| TM Tar% |
10% |
13% |
28% |
16% |
26% |
17% |
30% |
10% |
- |
10% |
0% |
19% |
33% |
21% |
13% |
12% |
17% |
18% |
| recTDs |
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
13 |
| FScore |
11 |
8 |
3 |
10 |
22 |
13 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
16 |
7 |
12 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
158 |
| FS/PPR |
15 |
11 |
8 |
15 |
31 |
17 |
6 |
12 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
21 |
17 |
16 |
1 |
5 |
16 |
224 |
| Opp |
cin
|
@ was
|
@ phi
|
hou
|
@ ne
|
@ nyj
|
buf
|
@ oak
|
bye
|
jac
|
ten
|
mia
|
@ jac
|
@ hou
|
dal
|
nyg
|
@ ten
|
|
|
| |
Eric Ebron 2019 Outlook
How do you follow up a career-best season in which you double your previous combined touchdown totals? Well, score some more. That's the mentality that Ebron is taking into his second year with the Colts after tallying 13 receiving TDs in 2018, which was good for second most in the league (behind Antonio Brown) and most among tight ends. Thirteen scores is apparently not enough for Ebron, who wants to chase the recently retired Rob Gronkowski's tight-end record of 17 touchdowns. Ebron enjoyed a career resurgence after being cut by the Lions last offseason, but he's out to prove his end-zone dominance and strong play last year was no fluke. "If I go and get 17," he added, "I help my team win games. ..." While matching last year's total seems like a reach, ESPN's Mike Clay notes that in the five seasons Frank Reich has been a HC or OC, his offenses distributed a target share of at least 23 percent to the team's tight ends. That includes a share of at least 27 percent each of the past three seasons. Again, touchdown regression is a thing. And Jack Doyle will be back. Ebron had minor groin surgery this offseason (he was running routes at full speed in June and should be ready for training camp). But considering all that, expecting top-10 output still seems reasonable enough.
| | |
