2023 Stats | LAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
91% |
94% |
89% |
75% |
- |
96% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
90% |
rshYds |
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6 |
rushes |
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
recYds |
76
|
111
|
215
|
32
|
-
|
85
|
55
|
69
|
77
|
175
|
116
|
106
|
58
|
68
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1243 |
Tar/Rec |
9/6 |
10/8 |
20/18 |
5/3 |
- |
11/7 |
9/4 |
10/8 |
9/8 |
14/11 |
16/10 |
16/14 |
9/5 |
12/6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
150/108 |
TM Tar% |
29% |
26% |
42% |
23% |
- |
32% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
32% |
recTDs |
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7 |
FScore |
8 |
23 |
27 |
9 |
0 |
14 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
29 |
17 |
10 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
173 |
FS/PPR |
14 |
31 |
45 |
12 |
0 |
21 |
9 |
14 |
15 |
40 |
27 |
24 |
10 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
281 |
Opp |
mia
|
@ ten
|
@ min
|
lvr
|
bye
|
dal
|
@ kc
|
chi
|
@ nyj
|
det
|
@ gb
|
bal
|
@ ne
|
den
|
@ lvr
|
buf
|
@ den
|
kc
|
|
|
|
2022 Stats | LAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
32% |
- |
- |
- |
68% |
89% |
96% |
86% |
89% |
84% |
84% |
76% |
79% |
rshYds |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
0
|
8 |
rushes |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1 |
rshTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
66
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
94
|
49
|
88
|
92
|
86
|
104
|
60
|
102
|
752 |
Tar/Rec |
4/4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2/2 |
- |
- |
- |
8/5 |
7/5 |
14/6 |
14/12 |
9/8 |
14/11 |
6/5 |
11/8 |
89/66 |
TM Tar% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4% |
- |
- |
- |
30% |
15% |
31% |
29% |
24% |
47% |
20% |
20% |
23% |
recTDs |
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
4 |
FScore |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
10 |
14 |
9 |
8 |
10 |
6 |
22 |
100 |
FS/PPR |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
15 |
20 |
21 |
16 |
21 |
11 |
30 |
166 |
Opp |
lvr
|
@ kc
|
jac
|
@ hou
|
@ cle
|
den
|
sea
|
bye
|
@ atl
|
@ sf
|
kc
|
@ ari
|
@ lvr
|
mia
|
ten
|
@ ind
|
lar
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
2021 Stats | LAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
83% |
92% |
83% |
88% |
91% |
91% |
- |
98% |
90% |
93% |
82% |
86% |
- |
- |
78% |
89% |
73% |
88% |
87% |
recYds |
100
|
108
|
50
|
36
|
75
|
50
|
-
|
77
|
104
|
98
|
112
|
85
|
34
|
-
|
78
|
35
|
44
|
52
|
1138 |
Tar/Rec |
13/9 |
8/4 |
12/8 |
11/7 |
9/6 |
5/5 |
- |
11/6 |
13/12 |
11/8 |
13/9 |
10/7 |
8/5 |
- |
10/6 |
6/4 |
9/4 |
8/6 |
157/106 |
TM Tar% |
29% |
20% |
34% |
30% |
22% |
13% |
- |
32% |
35% |
34% |
32% |
24% |
- |
- |
28% |
18% |
30% |
30% |
27% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
6 |
FScore |
10 |
10 |
11 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
0 |
13 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
8 |
15 |
0 |
13 |
3 |
10 |
5 |
149 |
FS/PPR |
19 |
14 |
19 |
10 |
13 |
10 |
0 |
19 |
22 |
17 |
20 |
15 |
20 |
0 |
19 |
7 |
14 |
11 |
255 |
Opp |
@ was
|
dal
|
@ kc
|
lvr
|
cle
|
@ bal
|
bye
|
ne
|
@ phi
|
min
|
pit
|
@ den
|
@ cin
|
nyg
|
kc
|
@ hou
|
den
|
@ lvr
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | LAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
95% |
98% |
96% |
94% |
17% |
- |
85% |
98% |
99% |
87% |
95% |
94% |
86% |
78% |
36% |
- |
- |
84% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-1
|
-
|
-
|
-1 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
recYds |
37
|
96
|
132
|
62
|
29
|
-
|
125
|
67
|
103
|
39
|
145
|
40
|
48
|
52
|
17
|
-
|
-
|
992 |
Tar/Rec |
8/4 |
10/7 |
19/13 |
11/8 |
2/2 |
- |
13/10 |
12/9 |
11/9 |
7/3 |
19/16 |
10/4 |
11/5 |
11/9 |
3/1 |
- |
- |
147/100 |
TM Tar% |
28% |
32% |
40% |
48% |
6% |
- |
32% |
27% |
29% |
22% |
40% |
20% |
21% |
25% |
10% |
- |
- |
27% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
8 |
FScore |
3 |
9 |
19 |
6 |
8 |
0 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
9 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
147 |
FS/PPR |
7 |
16 |
32 |
14 |
10 |
0 |
22 |
21 |
25 |
12 |
36 |
14 |
9 |
20 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
247 |
Opp |
@ cin
|
kc
|
car
|
@ tb
|
@ no
|
bye
|
jac
|
@ den
|
lvr
|
@ mia
|
@ nyj
|
@ buf
|
ne
|
atl
|
@ lvr
|
den
|
@ kc
|
|
|
|
Keenan Allen 2023 Outlook
The 10-year veteran will be looking to remain healthy and bounce back from a 2022 season in which he missed seven of the first nine games due to injuries. His production per game was on par with his career norms so it doesn't appear that he is entering decline mode. But the Chargers need him on the field and not observing from the sideline. The five-time Pro Bowl selection will surely go over the 800-reception mark for his career and figures to top 10,000 career yards if he stays healthy. With quarterback Justin Herbert entering his prime, Allen could regain the form he displayed from 2017-2021 when he had 100 or more receptions four times and fell eight yards shy in 2020 from having a run of five consecutive 1,000-yard campaigns. Allen was in form late in the 2022 season when he was healthy as his only two 100-yard outings came in the final three weeks of the season. He also had two big reception games in December -- games of 12 and 11 -- falling two weeks apart.
Keenan Allen 2022 Outlook
As Pro Football Network put it, "Are you a fan of consistency? What about route-running savants who specialize in mid-phase separation? Perhaps a dash of age-adjusted value and a side helping of over a 25 percent target share from an elite quarterback? If you answered 'yes,' Allen is still your cup of tea. ..." It's a fair assessment. Since 2017, Allen has averaged 102 catches for 1,184 yards and just over six touchdowns. He's also played in 78 of 81 regular-season games during that time span. He has at least 135 targets in five straight years, with four seasons of 100 or more receptions and at least 1,100 receiving yards. In those campaigns, Allen has recorded 26 percent of the team targets and 47 percent of the team's wide receiver targets. This past season, Allen broke the franchise's single-season receptions record -- which had already belonged to him -- with 106. He did that last season even with fellow starter Mike Williams setting a single-season career high with 1,146 receiving yards. Williams and Allen both went over 1,000 yards in a season for the second time together. The first was in 2019. Williams finished ninth in the NFL in receiving touchdowns (nine) and 11th in yards per reception (15.1). So even if Williams continues to play well, Allen should still be in line for his 130 targets, 100 receptions, 1,000 yards and six touchdowns.
Keenan Allen 2021 Outlook
If high-end consistency is your thing, Allen is your guy. The veteran wideout has at least 97 catches in each of the last four seasons. In 2020, Allen had 992 receiving yards and tied a career high with eight touchdowns in 14 games. While Allen was 12th in fantasy points among wide receivers, SI.com's Michael Fabiano notes he was seventh at the position in terms of points per game average. Allen became the favorite receiver for Justin Herbert, just like he was for Philip Rivers for so many years. In fact, Allen was even better in the 13 games he played with Herbert last season than he was without him, ranking fifth in fantasy points per game while leading all wideouts in targets per game (10.7). By the way, that consistency is long-standing. The Pro Football Hall of Fame is now displaying the jersey and gloves Allen used during the Chargers' Week 14 victory over the Falcons. In that game, Allen recorded his 623rd career reception while playing in his 99th game. He surpassed Antonio Brown (622 receptions in 100 games) for the most receptions by a player in NFL history in their first 100 contests. With Herbert working behind an upgraded offensive line, don't let the change in coaching staff worry you here.
| | | |