| 2020 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
63% |
67% |
61% |
30% |
61% |
64% |
82% |
62% |
68% |
79% |
- |
85% |
- |
81% |
62% |
49% |
- |
66% |
| recYds |
58
|
70
|
100
|
32
|
53
|
45
|
112
|
24
|
39
|
109
|
-
|
25
|
130
|
41
|
112
|
17
|
-
|
967 |
| Tar/Rec |
7/4 |
6/5 |
7/6 |
4/3 |
6/6 |
7/4 |
12/11 |
2/2 |
3/3 |
13/11 |
- |
4/2 |
11/9 |
10/5 |
10/8 |
5/3 |
- |
107/82 |
| TM Tar% |
16% |
17% |
23% |
13% |
14% |
33% |
29% |
13% |
8% |
30% |
- |
17% |
- |
24% |
27% |
14% |
- |
20% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
4 |
| FScore |
5 |
7 |
10 |
9 |
5 |
10 |
11 |
2 |
3 |
16 |
0 |
7 |
19 |
4 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
125 |
| FS/PPR |
9 |
12 |
16 |
12 |
11 |
14 |
22 |
4 |
6 |
27 |
0 |
9 |
28 |
9 |
19 |
4 |
0 |
207 |
| Opp |
nyj
|
@ mia
|
lar
|
@ lvr
|
@ ten
|
kc
|
@ nyj
|
ne
|
sea
|
@ ari
|
bye
|
lac
|
@ sf
|
pit
|
@ den
|
@ ne
|
mia
|
|
|
| |
| 2019 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| recYds |
40
|
83
|
48
|
75
|
21
|
-
|
16
|
41
|
13
|
74
|
38
|
76
|
110
|
29
|
6
|
108
|
-
|
778 |
| Tar/Rec |
9/5 |
4/4 |
10/8 |
13/7 |
4/3 |
- |
6/3 |
7/3 |
2/2 |
6/4 |
4/4 |
9/6 |
7/6 |
7/4 |
6/1 |
12/7 |
- |
106/67 |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
6 |
| FScore |
4 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
13 |
17 |
8 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
113 |
| FS/PPR |
9 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
13 |
9 |
11 |
7 |
19 |
23 |
12 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
180 |
| Opp |
nyj
|
@ mia
|
lar
|
@ lvr
|
@ ten
|
kc
|
@ nyj
|
ne
|
sea
|
@ ari
|
bye
|
lac
|
@ sf
|
pit
|
@ den
|
@ ne
|
mia
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | DAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
67% |
57% |
70% |
55% |
60% |
58% |
80% |
- |
75% |
70% |
66% |
61% |
66% |
66% |
64% |
67% |
77% |
66% |
| recYds |
73
|
13
|
46
|
53
|
8
|
101
|
56
|
-
|
16
|
37
|
51
|
5
|
9
|
18
|
42
|
50
|
94
|
672 |
| Tar/Rec |
8/7 |
3/2 |
5/3 |
5/4 |
3/1 |
11/9 |
8/7 |
- |
4/3 |
5/4 |
7/5 |
3/1 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
7/4 |
5/5 |
6/6 |
87/65 |
| TM Tar% |
28% |
13% |
15% |
19% |
10% |
55% |
25% |
- |
13% |
15% |
22% |
7% |
11% |
8% |
19% |
20% |
14% |
17% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3 |
| FScore |
7 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
22 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
15 |
85 |
| FS/PPR |
14 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
31 |
12 |
0 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
10 |
21 |
150 |
| Opp |
@ bal
|
lac
|
@ min
|
@ gb
|
ten
|
@ hou
|
@ ind
|
ne
|
chi
|
@ nyj
|
bye
|
jac
|
@ mia
|
nyj
|
det
|
@ ne
|
mia
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | DAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
70% |
80% |
53% |
44% |
50% |
- |
45% |
40% |
67% |
65% |
51% |
76% |
56% |
46% |
63% |
59% |
- |
58% |
| recYds |
32
|
33
|
4
|
17
|
23
|
-
|
24
|
8
|
24
|
23
|
7
|
19
|
14
|
59
|
15
|
12
|
-
|
314 |
| Tar/Rec |
5/3 |
8/4 |
1/1 |
6/3 |
6/4 |
- |
2/1 |
3/2 |
6/4 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
3/2 |
3/2 |
5/3 |
5/1 |
3/2 |
- |
63/36 |
| TM Tar% |
13% |
16% |
6% |
17% |
17% |
- |
7% |
14% |
19% |
10% |
13% |
12% |
14% |
17% |
19% |
9% |
- |
14% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
4 |
| FScore |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
55 |
| FS/PPR |
6 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
18 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
18 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
91 |
| Opp |
nyg
|
@ den
|
@ ari
|
lar
|
gb
|
bye
|
@ sf
|
@ was
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
phi
|
lac
|
was
|
@ nyg
|
@ oak
|
sea
|
@ phi
|
|
|
| |
Cole Beasley 2020 Outlook
Don't look now, but Beasley finished the 2019 season with more fantasy points than Curtis Samuel, Darius Slayton, Larry Fitzgerald, Mike Williams, Robby Anderson, Christian Kirk and Dede Westbrook. As FantasyPros' Mike Tagliere put it, "It's hard to say that Beasley shouldn't be considered higher in the rankings than he is." But there are reasons for the slide. Remember, the Bills' wide receivers improved greatly last year with the additions of Beasley and John Brown. In their first seasons with the Bills, the duo combined for 1,838 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns. But the Bills' front office obviously wants more, and this year made a big splash with the addition of Stefon Diggs as well as drafting Gabriel Davis in the fourth round and Isaiah Hodgins in the sixth round of the 2020 NFL Draft . As Tagliere suggests, considering their respective roles, the arrival of Diggs will surely affect Brown more than Beasley, and the defensive attention that the two speedier weapons are likely to attract will benefit him. But Beasley is still very unlikely to match the 104 targets he garnered last year. That said, as a late-round flier, Beasley does have some bench value in PPR formats.
Cole Beasley 2019 Outlook
As Bleacher Report noted, Beasley has been one of the most reliable slot receivers in the league. Playing with Tony Romo and Dak Prescott, Beasley was highly efficient in the short to intermediate portions of the field, especially on third down. While he's never been a No. 1 or even a No. 2 receiver in the NFL, he was an essential part of the Cowboys' offense. The Bills signed Beasley to a four-year deal this offseason worth up to $29 million with $17 million guaranteed. The team also signed John Brown to a similar deal and Zay Jones remains on the roster, but considering the contract Beasley signed, it seems safe to assume that the Bills are going to ask him to do more than he did in Dallas. In fact, Buffalo News staffer Vic Carucci points out the play-calling and schematic philosophy of OC Brian Daboll is deeply rooted in the Patriots' approach. Given that, Carucci believes Daboll will want Beasley to be the Bills' version of Julian Edelman, meaning, if all goes as planned, Beasley will finish as the team's leader in receptions while the bevy of running backs does their part to help dramatically improve the ground attack while contributing catches from the backfield. While all of that makes sense schematically, throwing short passes isn't what QB Josh Allen does best.
| | | |
