| 2019 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
70% |
49% |
60% |
86% |
65% |
- |
55% |
79% |
45% |
67% |
90% |
81% |
88% |
97% |
69% |
85% |
- |
73% |
| recYds |
40
|
83
|
48
|
75
|
21
|
-
|
16
|
41
|
13
|
74
|
38
|
76
|
110
|
29
|
6
|
108
|
-
|
778 |
| Tar/Rec |
9/5 |
4/4 |
10/8 |
13/7 |
3/3 |
- |
6/3 |
7/3 |
2/2 |
6/4 |
4/4 |
9/6 |
7/6 |
7/4 |
6/1 |
12/7 |
- |
105/67 |
| TM Tar% |
25% |
16% |
32% |
32% |
13% |
- |
26% |
27% |
11% |
15% |
13% |
41% |
28% |
22% |
26% |
52% |
- |
25% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
6 |
| FScore |
4 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
13 |
17 |
8 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
113 |
| FS/PPR |
9 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
13 |
9 |
11 |
7 |
19 |
23 |
12 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
180 |
| Opp |
@ nyj
|
@ nyg
|
cin
|
ne
|
@ ten
|
bye
|
mia
|
phi
|
was
|
@ cle
|
@ mia
|
den
|
@ dal
|
bal
|
@ pit
|
@ ne
|
nyj
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | DAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
67% |
57% |
70% |
55% |
60% |
58% |
80% |
- |
75% |
70% |
66% |
61% |
66% |
66% |
64% |
67% |
77% |
66% |
| recYds |
73
|
13
|
46
|
53
|
8
|
101
|
56
|
-
|
16
|
37
|
51
|
5
|
9
|
18
|
42
|
50
|
94
|
672 |
| Tar/Rec |
8/7 |
3/2 |
5/3 |
5/4 |
3/1 |
11/9 |
8/7 |
- |
4/3 |
5/4 |
7/5 |
3/1 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
7/4 |
5/5 |
6/6 |
87/65 |
| TM Tar% |
28% |
13% |
15% |
19% |
10% |
55% |
25% |
- |
13% |
15% |
22% |
7% |
11% |
8% |
19% |
20% |
14% |
17% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3 |
| FScore |
7 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
22 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
15 |
85 |
| FS/PPR |
14 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
31 |
12 |
0 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
10 |
21 |
150 |
| Opp |
@ bal
|
lac
|
@ min
|
@ gb
|
ten
|
@ hou
|
@ ind
|
ne
|
chi
|
@ nyj
|
bye
|
jac
|
@ mia
|
nyj
|
det
|
@ ne
|
mia
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | DAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
70% |
80% |
53% |
44% |
50% |
- |
45% |
40% |
67% |
65% |
51% |
76% |
56% |
46% |
63% |
59% |
- |
58% |
| recYds |
32
|
33
|
4
|
17
|
23
|
-
|
24
|
8
|
24
|
23
|
7
|
19
|
14
|
59
|
15
|
12
|
-
|
314 |
| Tar/Rec |
5/3 |
8/4 |
1/1 |
6/3 |
6/4 |
- |
2/1 |
3/2 |
6/4 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
3/2 |
3/2 |
5/3 |
5/1 |
3/2 |
- |
63/36 |
| TM Tar% |
13% |
16% |
6% |
17% |
17% |
- |
7% |
14% |
19% |
10% |
13% |
12% |
14% |
17% |
19% |
9% |
- |
14% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
4 |
| FScore |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
55 |
| FS/PPR |
6 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
18 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
18 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
91 |
| Opp |
nyg
|
@ den
|
@ ari
|
lar
|
gb
|
bye
|
@ sf
|
@ was
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
phi
|
lac
|
was
|
@ nyg
|
@ oak
|
sea
|
@ phi
|
|
|
| |
Cole Beasley 2019 Outlook
As Bleacher Report noted, Beasley has been one of the most reliable slot receivers in the league. Playing with Tony Romo and Dak Prescott, Beasley was highly efficient in the short to intermediate portions of the field, especially on third down. While he's never been a No. 1 or even a No. 2 receiver in the NFL, he was an essential part of the Cowboys' offense. The Bills signed Beasley to a four-year deal this offseason worth up to $29 million with $17 million guaranteed. The team also signed John Brown to a similar deal and Zay Jones remains on the roster, but considering the contract Beasley signed, it seems safe to assume that the Bills are going to ask him to do more than he did in Dallas. In fact, Buffalo News staffer Vic Carucci points out the play-calling and schematic philosophy of OC Brian Daboll is deeply rooted in the Patriots' approach. Given that, Carucci believes Daboll will want Beasley to be the Bills' version of Julian Edelman, meaning, if all goes as planned, Beasley will finish as the team's leader in receptions while the bevy of running backs does their part to help dramatically improve the ground attack while contributing catches from the backfield. While all of that makes sense schematically, throwing short passes isn't what QB Josh Allen does best.
| | |
