| 2018 Stats | DAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
67% |
57% |
70% |
55% |
60% |
58% |
80% |
- |
75% |
70% |
66% |
61% |
66% |
66% |
64% |
67% |
77% |
66% |
| recYds |
73
|
13
|
46
|
53
|
8
|
101
|
56
|
-
|
16
|
37
|
51
|
5
|
9
|
18
|
42
|
50
|
94
|
672 |
| Tar/Rec |
8/7 |
3/2 |
5/3 |
5/4 |
3/1 |
11/9 |
8/7 |
- |
4/3 |
5/4 |
7/5 |
3/1 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
7/4 |
5/5 |
6/6 |
87/65 |
| TM Tar% |
28% |
13% |
15% |
19% |
10% |
55% |
25% |
- |
13% |
15% |
22% |
7% |
11% |
8% |
19% |
20% |
14% |
17% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3 |
| FScore |
7 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
22 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
15 |
85 |
| FS/PPR |
14 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
31 |
12 |
0 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
10 |
21 |
150 |
| Opp |
@ bal
|
lac
|
@ min
|
@ gb
|
ten
|
@ hou
|
@ ind
|
ne
|
chi
|
@ nyj
|
bye
|
jac
|
@ mia
|
nyj
|
det
|
@ ne
|
mia
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | DAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
70% |
80% |
53% |
44% |
50% |
- |
45% |
40% |
67% |
65% |
51% |
76% |
56% |
46% |
63% |
59% |
- |
58% |
| recYds |
32
|
33
|
4
|
17
|
23
|
-
|
24
|
8
|
24
|
23
|
7
|
19
|
14
|
59
|
15
|
12
|
-
|
314 |
| Tar/Rec |
5/3 |
8/4 |
1/1 |
6/3 |
6/4 |
- |
2/1 |
3/2 |
6/4 |
3/2 |
4/2 |
3/2 |
3/2 |
5/3 |
5/1 |
3/2 |
- |
63/36 |
| TM Tar% |
13% |
16% |
6% |
17% |
17% |
- |
7% |
14% |
19% |
10% |
13% |
12% |
14% |
17% |
19% |
9% |
- |
14% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
4 |
| FScore |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
55 |
| FS/PPR |
6 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
18 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
18 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
91 |
| Opp |
nyg
|
@ den
|
@ ari
|
lar
|
gb
|
bye
|
@ sf
|
@ was
|
kc
|
@ atl
|
phi
|
lac
|
was
|
@ nyg
|
@ oak
|
sea
|
@ phi
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | DAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
63% |
60% |
44% |
67% |
51% |
48% |
- |
67% |
40% |
54% |
62% |
62% |
48% |
64% |
61% |
47% |
70% |
57% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| recYds |
65
|
75
|
73
|
66
|
53
|
58
|
-
|
53
|
56
|
33
|
59
|
56
|
23
|
41
|
48
|
25
|
49
|
833 |
| Tar/Rec |
12/8 |
6/5 |
7/7 |
4/3 |
4/4 |
6/6 |
- |
7/4 |
6/6 |
9/5 |
6/5 |
6/5 |
4/2 |
7/4 |
5/4 |
5/4 |
4/3 |
98/75 |
| TM Tar% |
28% |
20% |
29% |
13% |
17% |
22% |
- |
18% |
21% |
28% |
17% |
26% |
22% |
19% |
14% |
24% |
15% |
21% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5 |
| FScore |
6 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
11 |
17 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
3 |
11 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
113 |
| FS/PPR |
14 |
12 |
14 |
10 |
15 |
23 |
0 |
9 |
17 |
8 |
16 |
10 |
4 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
189 |
| Opp |
nyg
|
@ was
|
chi
|
@ sf
|
cin
|
@ gb
|
bye
|
phi
|
@ cle
|
@ pit
|
bal
|
was
|
@ min
|
@ nyg
|
tb
|
det
|
@ phi
|
|
|
| |
Cole Beasley 2017 Outlook
Hamstring soreness kept Beasley from practicing during the first week of OTAs and HC Jason Garrett called it a good opportunity for the younger players to get some work. That included rookie Ryan Switzer, who took first-team reps in the slot. One of the reasons the Cowboys liked Switzer was because he could provide the team with some insurance if something happened to Beasley. But the plan isn't for Switzer to only get reps when Beasley is out. According to the Dallas Morning News, the Cowboys are working on packages for both to be on the field at the same time to take advantage of mismatches. Remember, Beasley handled between four and six targets in 13 of 17 games last season. He saw seven (twice), nine and 12 in the other four outings. As ESPN's Mike Clay notes, Beasley played 58 percent of Dallas' snaps, including 75 percent of pass plays and handled 20 percent of the targets. All were career highs. Beasley finished 40th among wide receivers in fantasy points, but Clay believes that's his ceiling. If Dez Bryant remains in the locked and upright position all season long and Switzer is able to cut into Beasley's snaps, then even his ceiling might not be all that fantasy-friendly.
| | |
