| 2019 Stats | BAL | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
32% |
58% |
60% |
46% |
65% |
38% |
51% |
- |
44% |
49% |
46% |
31% |
55% |
55% |
54% |
41% |
- |
48% |
rshYds |
107
|
47
|
103
|
71
|
44
|
52
|
46
|
-
|
115
|
34
|
48
|
111
|
59
|
50
|
76
|
55
|
-
|
1018 |
rushes |
14
|
13
|
16
|
12
|
19
|
13
|
12
|
-
|
15
|
9
|
13
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
13
|
8
|
-
|
202 |
| rshTDs |
2
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
10 |
| recYds |
0
|
30
|
32
|
0
|
5
|
22
|
7
|
-
|
29
|
0
|
37
|
7
|
3
|
29
|
10
|
36
|
-
|
247 |
| Tar/Rec |
0/0 |
2/2 |
4/4 |
1/1 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
1/1 |
- |
3/2 |
0/0 |
4/3 |
1/1 |
2/2 |
3/3 |
2/1 |
2/2 |
- |
29/26 |
| TM Tar% |
0% |
6% |
10% |
3% |
8% |
10% |
5% |
- |
14% |
0% |
16% |
5% |
9% |
13% |
10% |
7% |
- |
8% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
5 |
| FScore |
22 |
7 |
31 |
7 |
10 |
13 |
5 |
0 |
14 |
9 |
20 |
23 |
6 |
7 |
20 |
15 |
0 |
216 |
| FS/PPR |
22 |
9 |
35 |
8 |
12 |
15 |
6 |
0 |
16 |
9 |
23 |
24 |
8 |
10 |
21 |
17 |
0 |
242 |
| Opp |
@ mia
|
ari
|
@ kc
|
cle
|
@ pit
|
cin
|
@ sea
|
bye
|
ne
|
@ cin
|
hou
|
@ lar
|
sf
|
@ buf
|
nyj
|
@ cle
|
pit
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | NOR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
- |
- |
- |
- |
55% |
- |
49% |
43% |
48% |
41% |
43% |
47% |
40% |
45% |
45% |
48% |
37% |
45% |
rshYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
53
|
-
|
32
|
63
|
33
|
104
|
103
|
52
|
27
|
52
|
63
|
35
|
28
|
645 |
rushes |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16
|
-
|
12
|
13
|
9
|
13
|
16
|
11
|
7
|
13
|
12
|
11
|
5
|
138 |
| rshTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
6 |
| recYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
10
|
29
|
3
|
58
|
0
|
14
|
1
|
1
|
11
|
8
|
15
|
170 |
| Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3/2 |
- |
2/2 |
3/3 |
2/1 |
3/3 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
3/2 |
3/1 |
2/2 |
2/1 |
2/2 |
27/21 |
| TM Tar% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11% |
- |
7% |
14% |
6% |
12% |
0% |
9% |
11% |
10% |
6% |
5% |
11% |
8% |
| recTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
3 |
22 |
22 |
6 |
2 |
11 |
7 |
10 |
4 |
123 |
| FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
6 |
12 |
4 |
25 |
22 |
8 |
4 |
12 |
9 |
11 |
6 |
144 |
| Opp |
buf
|
@ cin
|
den
|
@ pit
|
@ cle
|
@ ten
|
no
|
@ car
|
pit
|
bye
|
cin
|
oak
|
@ atl
|
@ kc
|
tb
|
@ lac
|
cle
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | NOR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
42% |
54% |
50% |
62% |
- |
66% |
55% |
51% |
60% |
48% |
39% |
51% |
56% |
81% |
60% |
49% |
- |
55% |
rshYds |
17
|
52
|
56
|
45
|
-
|
114
|
105
|
75
|
77
|
131
|
134
|
31
|
85
|
49
|
74
|
44
|
35
|
1124 |
rushes |
6
|
8
|
14
|
14
|
-
|
25
|
22
|
18
|
16
|
21
|
11
|
11
|
14
|
12
|
12
|
13
|
13
|
230 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
12 |
| recYds |
54
|
24
|
30
|
17
|
-
|
36
|
5
|
24
|
2
|
0
|
21
|
5
|
37
|
43
|
77
|
22
|
19
|
416 |
| Tar/Rec |
5/5 |
5/4 |
4/2 |
8/4 |
- |
5/5 |
5/4 |
6/6 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
7/6 |
5/4 |
6/5 |
3/3 |
4/4 |
71/58 |
| TM Tar% |
13% |
11% |
14% |
20% |
- |
16% |
13% |
22% |
4% |
0% |
10% |
9% |
21% |
14% |
17% |
11% |
- |
13% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
| FScore |
7 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
0 |
27 |
17 |
15 |
7 |
31 |
21 |
3 |
18 |
9 |
27 |
12 |
5 |
225 |
| FS/PPR |
12 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
32 |
21 |
21 |
8 |
31 |
24 |
5 |
24 |
13 |
32 |
15 |
9 |
284 |
| Opp |
@ min
|
ne
|
@ car
|
@ mia
|
bye
|
det
|
@ gb
|
chi
|
tb
|
@ buf
|
was
|
@ lar
|
car
|
@ atl
|
nyj
|
atl
|
@ tb
|
|
|
| |
Mark Ingram 2019 Outlook
At the NFL Combine, HC John Harbaugh said Gus Edwards was the Ravens' No. 1 running back ahead of Kenneth Dixon but that the team would look to bring in competition. And they certainly did, first by adding Ingram in free agency and then selecting Justice Hill in April's draft. But the focus here is on Ingram, a physical, downhill runner who can work between the tackles or bounce outside. Assume Ingram will be the top man in the rotation while remembering he's familiar with (and capable of succeeding in) timeshare situations. For the past two seasons, Ingram has been part of a potent one-two running back combination in New Orleans with Alvin Kamara. An effective red-zone runner, Ingram has 50 career rushing touchdowns, which is a Saints franchise record. He had six last year and 12 in 2017. Meanwhile, as ESPN's Matthew Berry pointed out, in Weeks 11-17 last season (with Lamar Jackson starting at QB), the Ravens ranked third in RB carries per game (27.6), first in RB rush yards (149.0) and first in yards per carry (5.40). During that stretch, Baltimore also averaged a league-high 70.9 offensive snaps per game. So, yes. This is an appealing landing spot for the former Saint -- although Jackson's rushing ability has to be of some concern as the team nears the goal line.
Mark Ingram 2018 Outlook
As NFL.com's Chris Wesseling notes, Ingram and Alvin Kamara combined for more than 3,000 yards from scrimmage and 25 touchdowns last year, unseating Atlanta’s Devonta Freeman and Tevin Coleman as the NFL’s most productive and well-rounded backfield. However, Ingram will begin the 2018 season serving a four-game suspension for performance-enhancing drugs and will be eligible to return after the team’s September 30 game against the Giants. Now it's safe to assume Kamara will get ample opportunity to carry a full share of the workload over the first month of the season with Ingram out. And losing a quarter season of production is going to mean a hit on Ingram's ADP -- and likely solidify Kamara's status as a high-end first rounder for fantasy purposes. Even so, don't bail on Ingram. He is unlikely to lose his role to the likes of Trey Edmunds, Jonathan Williams, Daniel Lasco and rookie Boston Scott, and there is something to be said for a running back joining the fray with fresh legs in October.
| | |
