| 2019 Stats | LAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
2% |
18% |
15% |
10% |
1% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2% |
32% |
- |
3% |
- |
8% |
rshYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
-
|
-2
|
-
|
7 |
rushes |
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
10 |
| rshTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0 |
| pasYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
26
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
33 |
| pasTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
1 |
| INTs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0 |
| FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
-1 |
0 |
6 |
| Opp |
ind
|
@ det
|
hou
|
@ mia
|
den
|
pit
|
@ ten
|
@ chi
|
gb
|
@ oak
|
kc
|
bye
|
@ den
|
@ jac
|
min
|
oak
|
@ kc
|
|
|
| |
| 2018 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
100% |
100% |
40% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
61% |
rshYds |
77
|
26
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
125 |
rushes |
8
|
4
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16 |
| rshTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
| pasYds |
197
|
246
|
19
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
473 |
| pasTDs |
1
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2 |
| INTs |
1
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2 |
| FScore |
26 |
17 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
| Opp |
kc
|
@ buf
|
@ lar
|
sf
|
oak
|
@ cle
|
ten
|
bye
|
@ sea
|
@ oak
|
den
|
ari
|
@ pit
|
cin
|
@ kc
|
bal
|
@ den
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | BUF | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
- |
100% |
100% |
100% |
77% |
62% |
100% |
69% |
- |
100% |
100% |
- |
94% |
rshYds |
38
|
55
|
13
|
12
|
3
|
-
|
53
|
1
|
35
|
27
|
38
|
27
|
32
|
-
|
42
|
16
|
35
|
427 |
rushes |
8
|
8
|
8
|
7
|
1
|
-
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
3
|
4
|
9
|
3
|
-
|
6
|
3
|
6
|
84 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
| pasYds |
224
|
125
|
213
|
182
|
166
|
-
|
268
|
165
|
285
|
56
|
158
|
183
|
65
|
-
|
224
|
281
|
204
|
2799 |
| pasTDs |
2
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
14 |
| INTs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
| FScore |
22 |
11 |
19 |
14 |
11 |
0 |
22 |
18 |
31 |
4 |
21 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
25 |
15 |
17 |
258 |
| Opp |
nyj
|
@ car
|
den
|
@ atl
|
@ cin
|
bye
|
tb
|
oak
|
@ nyj
|
no
|
@ lac
|
@ kc
|
ne
|
ind
|
mia
|
@ ne
|
@ mia
|
|
|
| |
Tyrod Taylor 2019 Outlook
The Chargers landed a solid veteran backup quarterback when Taylor agreed to a two-year contract with the club. ... The Chargers were in the market for a backup to Philip Rivers after spending the 2018 season with the uninspiring Geno Smith and Cardale Jones in that position. L.A. could still be in the market for a young developmental backup as the eventual replacement whenever Rivers walks away from football. Worth noting, HC Anthony Lynn knows Taylor well, having spent two seasons together in Buffalo. Taylor started 46 games over the past four seasons with the Bills and Browns, including three last season before being replaced by Baker Mayfield in Cleveland. As NFL.com's Kevin Patra suggested, while he was an up-and-down, full-time starter in Buffalo for three seasons, Taylor represents high-end backup insurance for the Chargers. Signing in L.A. to play behind Rivers, who hasn't missed a start since taking over in 2006, signals that there wasn't much interest in teams signing Taylor to compete for a starting gig. Inking with a potential Super Bowl contender, however, is a stellar alternative. And if Rivers does go down, the Chargers now have a backup who has proven he can win games.
Tyrod Taylor 2018 Outlook
As it stands heading into training camp, the Browns quarterback depth chart for 2018 looks like this: No. 1, Taylor. No. 2, Drew Stanton and No. 3, rookie Baker Mayfield. HC Hue Jackson swears this order will not change despite Mayfield being the Browns' first pick in the first round of this year's draft. Recent history in Cleveland (with DeShone Kizer, Johnny Manziel, Cody Kessler, Brandon Weeden, Colt McCoy and Brady Quinn all being colossal failures) suggests Jackson’s strategy is a good starting point. As Fansided.com notes, that's exactly why the team picked up Taylor from the Bills in the first place. Taylor is the NFL-ready version of what GM John Dorsey, Jackson, OC Todd Haley and Browns fans everywhere hope Mayfield will eventually become (and far exceed). So the Browns’ plan is to let the talented Mayfield watch the more experienced Taylor this season, giving Mayfield plenty of time to adjust to reading NFL defenses, to learn how to play under center and to ultimately prove himself as a team leader. It’s worth noting, however, that if Taylor is a bridge quarterback, he's a bridge the Bills’ organization jumped off pretty quickly last season in favor of Nathan Peterman. Jackson’s best-intentions aside, expecting Taylor to last the full season as the starter seems like a reach.
| | |
