| 2017 Stats | OAK | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
71% |
79% |
80% |
89% |
61% |
79% |
82% |
71% |
84% |
- |
73% |
87% |
77% |
89% |
84% |
75% |
- |
79% |
| recYds |
56
|
25
|
43
|
46
|
25
|
14
|
107
|
57
|
126
|
-
|
36
|
2
|
9
|
75
|
17
|
15
|
35
|
688 |
| Tar/Rec |
5/5 |
6/4 |
6/4 |
8/3 |
6/3 |
3/2 |
7/6 |
5/4 |
9/8 |
- |
5/2 |
5/1 |
5/1 |
6/5 |
4/2 |
2/1 |
4/3 |
86/54 |
| TM Tar% |
16% |
21% |
20% |
23% |
24% |
10% |
13% |
10% |
31% |
- |
10% |
21% |
14% |
15% |
11% |
7% |
- |
16% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
| FScore |
5 |
2 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
5 |
12 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
80 |
| FS/PPR |
10 |
6 |
14 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
16 |
9 |
20 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
134 |
| Opp |
@ ten
|
nyj
|
@ was
|
@ den
|
bal
|
lac
|
kc
|
@ buf
|
@ mia
|
bye
|
ne
|
den
|
nyg
|
@ kc
|
dal
|
@ phi
|
@ lac
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | GNB | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
52% |
65% |
26% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
61% |
46% |
50% |
27% |
66% |
59% |
53% |
53% |
| recYds |
7
|
31
|
15
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
105
|
7
|
19
|
15
|
85
|
37
|
56
|
377 |
| Tar/Rec |
2/1 |
6/4 |
3/1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11/6 |
2/1 |
4/3 |
2/1 |
8/6 |
5/3 |
8/4 |
51/30 |
| TM Tar% |
6% |
17% |
13% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
26% |
5% |
13% |
8% |
27% |
13% |
21% |
16% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
43 |
| FS/PPR |
1 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
14 |
6 |
9 |
73 |
| Opp |
@ jac
|
@ min
|
det
|
bye
|
nyg
|
dal
|
chi
|
@ atl
|
ind
|
@ ten
|
@ was
|
@ phi
|
hou
|
sea
|
@ chi
|
min
|
@ det
|
|
|
| |
| 2015 Stats | LAR | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| recYds |
85
|
47
|
7
|
22
|
8
|
-
|
19
|
57
|
10
|
35
|
31
|
58
|
22
|
11
|
64
|
5
|
-
|
481 |
| Tar/Rec |
6/5 |
7/5 |
3/1 |
6/3 |
6/1 |
- |
4/2 |
3/2 |
3/1 |
3/2 |
6/4 |
6/4 |
9/3 |
1/1 |
6/4 |
2/1 |
- |
71/39 |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0 |
| FScore |
8 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
| FS/PPR |
13 |
9 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
87 |
| Opp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Jared Cook 2018 Outlook
Cook led the Raiders in receiving last season with 688 yards and could be a serious threat again this season. According to Fansided.com's Thomas Wheaton, although it was a down year for wideouts Michael Crabtree and Amari Cooper, QB Derek Carr and Cook seemed to have some nice chemistry. Case in point was a Thursday night game against the Chiefs, during which Carr trusted Cook to come down with a grab that put the Raiders on the doorstep of the end zone. Wheaton believes that kind of trust, especially in the red zone, is key for the success of NFL tight ends. Now that Cook and Carr have a year together under their belt, and Cook has shown his worth as a legitimate pass-catching threat, Wheaton is confident that Cook's role remains clear. With the added deep-threat in Martavis Bryant, the middle of the field will be more open for Cook to find space. Wheaton summed up, "(New HC Jon) Gruden surely will have a field day drawing up plays for Cook, and as a result, Cook will again have a very successful season." Fantasy owners take note.
Jared Cook 2017 Outlook
Cook drew interest from the Seahawks and Vikings before ultimately signing a two-year, $12.2 million deal with the Raiders this offseason. It's quite possible that the former Packer misread his market after emerging as Aaron Rodgers' secret weapon last season but he could have landed in worse spots. Cook is an exceptionally athletic seam-stretching tight end and should be an excellent fit in Derek Carr's aerial attack. And Cook knows what side his bread is buttered on: the newcomer immediately and favorably compared his new QB to his last QB. "(His) ball placement, able to read coverages on the move," said Cook of Carr. The comparisons didn't stop there however, as the tight end voiced his admiration for the chemistry Carr has with his receivers at such a young age. Worth noting that Rodgers thought Cook should be an off-season priority and wanted him re-signed before Green Bay decided to bring in Martellus Bennett to replace him. Now Cook joins Lee Smith, Clive Walford and Cooper Helfet on a crowded Raiders' depth chart. Expect the newcomer to add to an already-solid offense -- but likely in a limited role with more established weapons (wideouts Amari Cooper and Michael Crabtree) already on board.
Jared Cook 2016 Outlook
While the Packers had an obvious attraction to Cook -- he's a fast tight end, something they haven't had on their roster for three years -- the eighth-year veteran had even more reason to be drawn to Green Bay. Aaron Rodgers will be the 12th quarterback to throw Cook a pass in the NFL. Before Rodgers, the best was probably Matt Hasselbeck. Last year was a low point, however, with Nick Foles and Case Keenum splitting time as Rams’ starters. It's no surprise Cook's production dipped in 2015 given their struggles. Cook had 39 catches after surpassing 50 in each of his first two seasons in St. Louis. He had 481 yards after receiving more than 600 in his first two years. Across the board, the Rams' offense was dreadful. They finished 29th in scoring. Last in yards. Last in passing. So Cook arrives in Green Bay with a sense of urgency, facing a crossroads in his career. Assuming he recovers from foot surgery performed the first week of June in time for the start of training camp, working with Rodgers clearly gives Cook an edge in getting back on track.
| | |
