| 2018 Stats | MIA | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
29% |
40% |
36% |
51% |
41% |
38% |
45% |
44% |
51% |
43% |
- |
55% |
36% |
50% |
13% |
- |
- |
41% |
rshYds |
61
|
25
|
12
|
41
|
63
|
101
|
29
|
53
|
53
|
90
|
-
|
67
|
21
|
92
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
722 |
rushes |
9
|
9
|
6
|
11
|
12
|
15
|
10
|
12
|
20
|
13
|
-
|
14
|
8
|
12
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
156 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0 |
| recYds |
0
|
19
|
0
|
16
|
0
|
18
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
12
|
-
|
10
|
10
|
24
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
124 |
| Tar/Rec |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
3/2 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
3/2 |
- |
2/1 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
16/12 |
| TM Tar% |
0% |
4% |
0% |
13% |
0% |
3% |
3% |
6% |
5% |
9% |
- |
9% |
4% |
6% |
0% |
- |
- |
4% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
1 |
| FScore |
6 |
4 |
1 |
11 |
6 |
11 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
| FS/PPR |
6 |
5 |
1 |
13 |
6 |
12 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
102 |
| Opp |
ten
|
@ nyj
|
oak
|
@ ne
|
@ cin
|
chi
|
det
|
@ hou
|
nyj
|
@ gb
|
bye
|
@ ind
|
buf
|
ne
|
@ min
|
jac
|
@ buf
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
38% |
45% |
62% |
58% |
51% |
40% |
33% |
49% |
61% |
58% |
- |
65% |
32% |
76% |
52% |
74% |
- |
53% |
rshYds |
42
|
46
|
57
|
46
|
48
|
49
|
34
|
82
|
51
|
54
|
-
|
62
|
61
|
130
|
31
|
68
|
100
|
961 |
rushes |
10
|
14
|
25
|
12
|
14
|
10
|
9
|
16
|
17
|
17
|
-
|
17
|
13
|
36
|
10
|
17
|
24
|
261 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
| recYds |
10
|
0
|
0
|
34
|
38
|
18
|
0
|
19
|
26
|
7
|
-
|
17
|
0
|
10
|
37
|
18
|
11
|
245 |
| Tar/Rec |
1/1 |
2/0 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
4/3 |
3/2 |
0/0 |
4/4 |
4/3 |
1/1 |
- |
5/2 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
4/3 |
2/2 |
3/3 |
38/29 |
| TM Tar% |
5% |
6% |
4% |
11% |
12% |
9% |
0% |
11% |
13% |
4% |
- |
19% |
0% |
5% |
14% |
6% |
- |
8% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
5 |
10 |
11 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
3 |
10 |
7 |
6 |
0 |
13 |
6 |
14 |
6 |
14 |
11 |
144 |
| FS/PPR |
6 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
11 |
8 |
3 |
14 |
10 |
7 |
0 |
15 |
6 |
15 |
9 |
16 |
14 |
173 |
| Opp |
@ lar
|
ari
|
cle
|
@ sea
|
sf
|
@ ten
|
jac
|
@ cin
|
@ hou
|
pit
|
bye
|
ten
|
@ jac
|
@ buf
|
den
|
@ bal
|
hou
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
69% |
47% |
60% |
44% |
79% |
64% |
83% |
48% |
69% |
- |
73% |
56% |
62% |
49% |
56% |
47% |
45% |
59% |
rshYds |
59
|
44
|
82
|
68
|
75
|
106
|
61
|
37
|
60
|
-
|
50
|
28
|
79
|
41
|
101
|
73
|
62
|
1026 |
rushes |
14
|
13
|
21
|
16
|
14
|
22
|
17
|
9
|
19
|
-
|
18
|
15
|
20
|
10
|
26
|
13
|
16
|
263 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
| recYds |
19
|
19
|
1
|
27
|
4
|
2
|
22
|
25
|
11
|
-
|
71
|
3
|
0
|
33
|
14
|
12
|
14
|
277 |
| Tar/Rec |
6/4 |
3/3 |
3/1 |
6/5 |
2/1 |
1/1 |
5/5 |
3/2 |
2/2 |
- |
4/4 |
1/1 |
1/0 |
2/2 |
4/4 |
2/1 |
2/2 |
47/38 |
| TM Tar% |
13% |
8% |
9% |
15% |
5% |
3% |
13% |
9% |
6% |
- |
14% |
3% |
3% |
5% |
14% |
7% |
5% |
8% |
| recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4 |
| FScore |
7 |
12 |
14 |
15 |
7 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
19 |
0 |
12 |
3 |
7 |
13 |
11 |
8 |
7 |
178 |
| FS/PPR |
11 |
15 |
15 |
20 |
8 |
11 |
19 |
14 |
21 |
0 |
16 |
4 |
7 |
15 |
15 |
9 |
9 |
216 |
| Opp |
det
|
@ den
|
sd
|
@ jac
|
chi
|
@ hou
|
@ ten
|
kc
|
@ gb
|
bye
|
ten
|
pit
|
@ nyj
|
hou
|
@ min
|
@ oak
|
jac
|
|
|
| |
| 2015 Stats | IND | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| rshYds |
31
|
57
|
86
|
53
|
98
|
78
|
43
|
70
|
83
|
-
|
34
|
24
|
45
|
60
|
44
|
85
|
76
|
967 |
rushes |
8
|
15
|
14
|
17
|
22
|
13
|
9
|
22
|
28
|
-
|
14
|
19
|
13
|
16
|
16
|
15
|
19
|
260 |
| rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
6 |
| recYds |
0
|
4
|
8
|
34
|
0
|
16
|
32
|
22
|
19
|
-
|
46
|
13
|
49
|
-1
|
15
|
10
|
0
|
267 |
| Tar/Rec |
3/2 |
1/1 |
2/1 |
7/5 |
0/0 |
3/2 |
8/5 |
3/3 |
3/1 |
- |
5/5 |
3/2 |
5/3 |
5/1 |
2/1 |
4/2 |
4/0 |
58/34 |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
| FScore |
3 |
6 |
21 |
8 |
15 |
9 |
7 |
9 |
16 |
0 |
8 |
3 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
21 |
7 |
165 |
| FS/PPR |
5 |
7 |
22 |
13 |
15 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
17 |
0 |
13 |
5 |
18 |
6 |
6 |
23 |
7 |
199 |
| Opp |
@ buf
|
nyj
|
@ ten
|
jac
|
@ hou
|
ne
|
no
|
@ car
|
den
|
bye
|
@ atl
|
tb
|
@ pit
|
@ jac
|
hou
|
@ mia
|
ten
|
|
|
| |
Frank Gore 2018 Outlook
Gore will be playing for his hometown team in 2018. This after the veteran running back agreed to a one-year contract with the Dolphins this offseason. Gore, who turned 35 in May, rushed for 961 yards for the Indianapolis Colts in 2017, just shy of what would have been his 10th career 1,000-yard season. The issue for fantasy owners centers on Gore's role -- and more specifically, what it means for Kenyan Drake. Drake (644 yards, 4.8 yards per carry) did what he could to replace Jay Ajayi after a mid-season trade but the Dolphins are still convinced that Drake needs help. HC Adam Gase said he wants to employ a two-back system. So there's no question Gore knows what sustained success at the pro level requires and that Drake will certainly benefit from that knowledge if he chooses. But Gore still has miles left on his legs. As NFL.com's Kevin Patra pointed out, despite working behind a porous Colts offensive line last season, the ageless veteran continued to find creases and move the pile. Patra went on to note Gore isn't going to break off 80-yard touchdowns but remains a workhorse. Even so, fantasy value in the Dolphins running game will be limited.
Frank Gore 2017 Outlook
The Colts finished 2016 as the 23rd-ranked rushing offense with 1,628 yards -- the third-most since Andrew Luck became their signal-caller in 2012. The 4.0 yards per carry was the second-highest since 2012, only slightly behind 2013's 4.3 yards per carry. More notably, Gore became the first Indy running back to run for 1,000 yards in a season since Joseph Addai in 2007. While all of those numbers may be impressive in terms of recent history for the team, they are still below the league average. According to Football Outsiders, the Colts' offensive line gave up the fewest percentage of runs where the running back was tackled at or behind the line of scrimmage. In fact, the Colts' offensive line (especially the interior) is one of the better run blocking units in the league. So it seems like Gore had all the tools he needed to put up incredible numbers, but couldn't pull it off at this stage of his career. In fact, in two seasons with the Colts, Gore has 523 carries, but only six have gained more than 20 yards. The only two times in his 12-year career he’s averaged less than 4 yards per carry? In 2016 (3.9) and ’15 (3.7).So fantasy owners should expect a solid workload but continuing pedestrian production.
Frank Gore 2016 Outlook
Although Gore wasn't a free agent this offseason, there were still questions about whether he would return to Indy. But any uncertainties over whether or not the Colts should pony up the $4 million cap hit for Gore's services in 2016 should be squashed with one number -- 967. That's how many rushing yards Gore mustered playing behind a leaky offensive line and a carousel of quarterbacks. "Toughest 967 I got," he fumed after the end of the season. It was the first time Gore hasn't hit 1,000 yards in a season in five years. But Indy Star staffer Zak Keefer contends the veteran RB wasn't the issue. Forget his age (33 at the start of next season). Forget the commonly-held notion that running backs aren't worth anything after they turn 30. Gore proved throughout the season to be as tough as they come, reliable Sunday after Sunday, and every bit the dedicated pro the Colts expected when they inked him to a three-year deal during the 2015 offseason. Give this man some holes to run through, and he'll produce.
| | | |
