| 2018 Stats | LAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
40% |
19% |
42% |
34% |
36% |
27% |
30% |
- |
31% |
20% |
35% |
38% |
38% |
40% |
57% |
67% |
24% |
37% |
| recYds |
16
|
0
|
45
|
27
|
19
|
5
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
18
|
80
|
18
|
0
|
19
|
54
|
21
|
0
|
333 |
| Tar/Rec |
3/2 |
1/0 |
5/3 |
4/2 |
2/2 |
2/1 |
3/2 |
- |
- |
2/1 |
7/5 |
1/1 |
1/0 |
2/2 |
5/4 |
5/3 |
2/0 |
45/28 |
| TM Tar% |
6% |
4% |
17% |
13% |
8% |
10% |
13% |
- |
0% |
8% |
18% |
3% |
0% |
7% |
13% |
14% |
0% |
9% |
| recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
| FScore |
1 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
45 |
| FS/PPR |
3 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
19 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
5 |
0 |
73 |
| Opp |
kc
|
@ buf
|
@ lar
|
sf
|
oak
|
@ cle
|
ten
|
bye
|
@ sea
|
@ oak
|
den
|
ari
|
@ pit
|
cin
|
@ kc
|
bal
|
@ den
|
|
|
| |
| 2017 Stats | LAC | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
66% |
55% |
55% |
63% |
53% |
57% |
31% |
45% |
- |
38% |
20% |
26% |
39% |
26% |
34% |
77% |
- |
45% |
| recYds |
17
|
11
|
30
|
18
|
23
|
16
|
4
|
25
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
0
|
32
|
0
|
10
|
81
|
46
|
316 |
| Tar/Rec |
3/2 |
4/2 |
5/2 |
5/3 |
3/2 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
2/2 |
- |
2/1 |
- |
2/0 |
4/3 |
1/0 |
3/1 |
8/6 |
6/4 |
50/30 |
| TM Tar% |
9% |
10% |
13% |
15% |
7% |
3% |
4% |
7% |
- |
6% |
0% |
6% |
9% |
3% |
8% |
21% |
- |
8% |
| recTDs |
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
3 |
| FScore |
1 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
4 |
49 |
| FS/PPR |
3 |
9 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
8 |
20 |
8 |
79 |
| Opp |
@ den
|
mia
|
kc
|
phi
|
@ nyg
|
@ oak
|
den
|
@ ne
|
bye
|
@ jac
|
buf
|
@ dal
|
cle
|
was
|
@ kc
|
@ nyj
|
oak
|
|
|
| |
| 2016 Stats | | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
| TM Snap % |
66% |
53% |
- |
- |
35% |
47% |
51% |
68% |
82% |
75% |
- |
61% |
60% |
57% |
64% |
84% |
58% |
62% |
| recYds |
20
|
15
|
-
|
-
|
30
|
16
|
38
|
33
|
75
|
63
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
61
|
11
|
94
|
55
|
548 |
| Tar/Rec |
4/3 |
5/3 |
- |
- |
5/4 |
6/2 |
10/5 |
9/4 |
9/5 |
9/4 |
- |
- |
4/4 |
9/5 |
2/1 |
13/8 |
8/5 |
93/53 |
| TM Tar% |
11% |
20% |
- |
- |
17% |
21% |
23% |
20% |
27% |
21% |
- |
0% |
17% |
25% |
7% |
30% |
24% |
19% |
| recTDs |
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
7 |
| FScore |
2 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
13 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
15 |
11 |
96 |
| FS/PPR |
5 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
3 |
8 |
13 |
18 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
11 |
2 |
23 |
16 |
149 |
| Opp |
@ kc
|
jac
|
@ ind
|
no
|
@ oak
|
den
|
@ atl
|
@ den
|
ten
|
mia
|
bye
|
@ hou
|
tb
|
@ car
|
oak
|
@ cle
|
kc
|
|
|
| |
Antonio Gates 2017 Outlook
Thanks to Philip Rivers force-feeding him passes, Gates finally got his mitts on the NFL record-setting 112th TD catch for a tight end but he dropped it. Hopefully the pressure will be lessened this season because he only needs one TD to own the record. But now the real question is will the Bolts drop Gates? He's lost a step at 36, finished with an uncharacteristic six drops on the season and the team could decide that his $5 million cap number might be too steep. Then again, his seven TD catches were only one off the team high. Rookie Hunter Henry got that with eight, proving to be a solid second-round pick. Indeed, for much of the season Gates was no longer the best tight end on the field for the Chargers. It's clear the torch has been passed to Henry. What isn't clear is what to do with Gates? Remember, Gates and Henry missed three games combined due to injury, which affected the Chargers' versatility in using different personnel groupings. With Gates at the end of his career, expect him to be more of a role player -- but expect that role to revolve around the red-zone offense where his chemistry with Philip Rivers will be a plus.
| | |
