2021 Stats | GNB | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
63% |
66% |
63% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
54% |
66% |
81% |
70% |
- |
66% |
66% |
- |
65% |
22% |
62% |
recYds |
17
|
-
|
59
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
19
|
41
|
123
|
50
|
-
|
20
|
98
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
430 |
Tar/Rec |
8/3 |
- |
4/3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2/2 |
2/1 |
10/4 |
9/4 |
- |
5/3 |
7/5 |
- |
3/1 |
- |
50/26 |
TM Tar% |
24% |
0% |
14% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6% |
6% |
32% |
20% |
- |
14% |
23% |
- |
7% |
7% |
14% |
recTDs |
0
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
3 |
FScore |
1 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
18 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
FS/PPR |
4 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
22 |
9 |
0 |
5 |
20 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
87 |
Opp |
cle
|
@ bal
|
lac
|
@ phi
|
buf
|
@ was
|
@ ten
|
nyg
|
gb
|
@ lvr
|
dal
|
bye
|
den
|
lvr
|
@ lac
|
pit
|
@ cin
|
@ den
|
|
|
|
2020 Stats | GNB | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
54% |
63% |
92% |
97% |
- |
84% |
82% |
83% |
89% |
92% |
85% |
79% |
75% |
70% |
65% |
62% |
48% |
76% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
9
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-4
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
13 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
4 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
96
|
64
|
5
|
45
|
-
|
32
|
0
|
19
|
53
|
149
|
55
|
-
|
0
|
85
|
-
|
-
|
87
|
690 |
Tar/Rec |
6/4 |
7/3 |
4/1 |
8/4 |
- |
5/3 |
4/0 |
1/1 |
4/2 |
6/4 |
6/3 |
- |
2/0 |
6/6 |
- |
- |
3/2 |
62/33 |
TM Tar% |
15% |
25% |
14% |
24% |
- |
19% |
12% |
3% |
13% |
18% |
18% |
0% |
6% |
19% |
0% |
0% |
13% |
13% |
recTDs |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
6 |
FScore |
15 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
-1 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
106 |
FS/PPR |
19 |
9 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
24 |
8 |
0 |
-1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
139 |
Opp |
@ min
|
det
|
@ no
|
atl
|
bye
|
@ tb
|
@ hou
|
min
|
@ sf
|
jac
|
@ ind
|
chi
|
phi
|
@ det
|
car
|
ten
|
@ chi
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | GNB | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
9 |
rushes |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
52
|
19
|
99
|
47
|
18
|
48
|
133
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
19
|
452 |
Tar/Rec |
6/4 |
5/3 |
10/6 |
7/3 |
4/1 |
2/2 |
3/2 |
2/1 |
- |
- |
- |
3/1 |
- |
- |
- |
1/1 |
7/2 |
50/26 |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2 |
FScore |
5 |
1 |
15 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
58 |
FS/PPR |
9 |
4 |
21 |
7 |
2 |
7 |
21 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
84 |
Opp |
@ min
|
det
|
@ no
|
atl
|
bye
|
@ tb
|
@ hou
|
min
|
@ sf
|
jac
|
@ ind
|
chi
|
phi
|
@ det
|
car
|
ten
|
@ chi
|
|
|
|
Marquez Valdes-Scantling 2022 Outlook
On the same day Tyreek Hill was introduced as a Miami Dolphin, the Chiefs signed former Packer Valdes-Scantling to a three-year, $30 million deal. Valdes-Scantling doesn't have the accolades and statistics that Hill does, but he does have the wheels. Hill was clocked at 21.91 mph in Week 14 of the 2020 season, per Next Gen Stats, and the only ball carrier who has been clocked a faster time in the past two seasons is Valdes-Scantling at 22.09 mph. Valdez-Scantling has been a solid option for Aaron Rodgers and the Packers when available and at his best. He had 26 catches for 430 yards and three touchdowns in 11 games last season. MVS' 2020 showing is more to what the Chiefs are likely looking for as he led the NFL with 20.9 yards per catch on 33 grabs for 690 yards and six touchdowns. MVS joins fellow free-agent signee JuJu Smith-Schuster, incoming rookie Skyy Moore, Pro Bowl tight end Travis Kelce and holdover wideout Mecole Hardman to comprise the current K.C. receiving ranks. As wide receivers are concerned, there's plenty of speed and potential, but no prototypical No. 1. That said, the Chiefs have filled their need for speed at receiver with a very intriguing signing in MVS.
Marquez Valdes-Scantling 2021 Outlook
As ZoneCoverage.com's Troy Asseln recently suggested, Valdes-Scantling didn't exactly endear himself to Packers fans last year, at least not consistently. Asseln went on to explain, "For every eye-popping touchdown grab that MVS would catch, it would either be preceded or followed by a drop so unforgivable that it would unite NFL fan bases across the country in their quest to meme the play to death." But ClutchPoint.com's Evan Massey argues that Valdes-Scantling is exactly the kind of "X-factor" Matt LaFleur needs given the concerns about Aaron Rodgers' future with the club. Whether Rodgers or Jordan Love is playing quarterback, they are going to need their weapons to step up. MVS has the potential to be a big-time playmaker. During the 2020 season with the Packers, Valdes-Scantling averaged an impressive 20.9 yards per reception (to go with his six touchdowns). Obviously, he can make a big play anytime he touches the football. Massey conceded Green Bay did go out and draft Amari Rodgers in the third round of the 2021 NFL Draft. They also have Allen Lazard on the roster. Both of those guys are quality players, but no one on the roster has the speed or playmaking ability that Valdes-Scantling has. The consistency issue, however, relegates him to late-round best-ball prospect at this point.
| | |