2019 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
recYds |
-
|
-
|
14
|
82
|
-
|
47
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22
|
29
|
23
|
-
|
229 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
2/1 |
3/3 |
- |
6/3 |
- |
- |
2/2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1/1 |
4/3 |
2/1 |
- |
20/14 |
recTDs |
-
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
4 |
FScore |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
46 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
17 |
3 |
0 |
60 |
Opp |
hou
|
@ lac
|
@ bal
|
ne
|
lvr
|
@ buf
|
@ den
|
nyj
|
car
|
bye
|
@ lvr
|
@ tb
|
den
|
@ mia
|
@ no
|
atl
|
lac
|
|
|
|
2018 Stats | ARI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
92% |
98% |
84% |
65% |
67% |
67% |
44% |
73% |
- |
63% |
39% |
40% |
35% |
63% |
81% |
9% |
- |
61% |
recYds |
19
|
17
|
35
|
52
|
0
|
69
|
12
|
12
|
-
|
51
|
5
|
5
|
10
|
31
|
22
|
3
|
-
|
343 |
Tar/Rec |
6/3 |
6/4 |
3/1 |
4/2 |
5/0 |
6/5 |
4/2 |
4/2 |
- |
9/5 |
3/1 |
2/1 |
3/1 |
5/3 |
8/3 |
1/1 |
- |
69/34 |
TM Tar% |
18% |
22% |
12% |
16% |
0% |
19% |
11% |
11% |
- |
24% |
17% |
13% |
13% |
13% |
24% |
3% |
- |
15% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1 |
FScore |
1 |
1 |
9 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
FS/PPR |
4 |
5 |
10 |
7 |
0 |
11 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
74 |
Opp |
was
|
@ lar
|
chi
|
sea
|
@ sf
|
@ min
|
den
|
sf
|
bye
|
@ kc
|
oak
|
@ lac
|
@ gb
|
det
|
@ atl
|
lar
|
@ sea
|
|
|
|
2017 Stats | ARI | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
- |
0% |
0% |
2% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14% |
23% |
23% |
28% |
35% |
54% |
- |
20% |
recYds |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
54
|
72
|
44
|
20
|
11
|
0
|
0
|
201 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1/0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5/3 |
6/4 |
5/2 |
3/1 |
6/2 |
1/0 |
1/0 |
28/12 |
TM Tar% |
- |
- |
0% |
0% |
2% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15% |
16% |
16% |
12% |
15% |
3% |
- |
9% |
recTDs |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3 |
FScore |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
17 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
Opp |
@ det
|
@ ind
|
dal
|
sf
|
@ phi
|
tb
|
@ lar
|
bye
|
@ sf
|
sea
|
@ hou
|
jac
|
lar
|
ten
|
@ was
|
nyg
|
@ sea
|
|
|
|
Ricky Seals-Jones 2019 Outlook
As Bleacher Report noted, the Cardinals added TEs Maxx Williams and Charles Clay this offseason, but both could end up playing behind Seals-Jones. While he's been a work in progress, the former Texas A&M wide receiver is starting to emerge as an NFL-level pass-catcher at the tight end position. Even in an atrocious Cardinals offense, he managed to catch 34 passes for 343 yards and a touchdown in 2018. Only Christian Kirk, Larry Fitzgerald and David Johnson caught more balls for the team. Worth noting is the fact that new Cardinals HC Kliff Kingsbury recruited Seals-Jones to Texas A&M when he was the OC of the Aggies, though Kingsbury left for the head coaching job at Texas Tech before Seals-Jones enrolled. Beyond that, the addition of new quarterback Kyler Murray could help Seals-Jones explode onto the scene in 2019. It's possible RSJ emerges as a viable piece in the new Murray-led Arizona offense even if he's not necessarily the starter (a job that could go to Clay or Williams, who are superior blockers). One last item here, the Cardinals ended the 2019 draft with the selection of UCLA tight end Caleb Wilson, another interesting project-type player who could be an issue for those banking on Seals-Jones in Dynasty leagues.
Ricky Seals-Jones 2018 Outlook
Seals-Jones started last season on the practice squad. He was promoted to the regular roster in late September. In his first two games, Seals-Jones played only on special teams. In his third, he played one snap on offense and failed to make a one-handed catch on that play. He was inactive for the next four games, but then became a more important part of the Cardinals' offense for the rest of the season. Seals-Jones caught two touchdown passes against Houston, the first of his career. In the last seven games of the season, he caught 12 passes for 201 yards and three touchdowns. Four of his 12 receptions gained at least 20 yards, a tally which equaled the combined production of every other Cardinals tight end for the entire season. As a receiving tight end, it is obvious that Seals-Jones creates matchup problems for defenses. He needs to improve as a blocker, however, otherwise defenses will be able to scheme to stop him as a receiver. You won't be drafting him as a front-line player, but certainly keep him on your early waiver-wire watch list.
| | |