2020 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
71% |
60% |
71% |
76% |
77% |
77% |
77% |
78% |
- |
58% |
57% |
61% |
67% |
92% |
70% |
- |
74% |
71% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
3
|
10 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
4 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
1 |
recYds |
61
|
46
|
36
|
48
|
88
|
40
|
48
|
52
|
-
|
29
|
23
|
143
|
62
|
52
|
61
|
-
|
51
|
840 |
Tar/Rec |
6/5 |
3/3 |
4/4 |
6/5 |
9/4 |
5/3 |
6/5 |
11/4 |
- |
5/3 |
2/2 |
11/8 |
10/8 |
9/6 |
8/7 |
- |
6/5 |
101/72 |
TM Tar% |
18% |
14% |
19% |
23% |
24% |
19% |
22% |
46% |
- |
28% |
12% |
42% |
33% |
21% |
27% |
- |
23% |
25% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
0
|
3 |
FScore |
6 |
4 |
3 |
10 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
12 |
5 |
12 |
0 |
11 |
116 |
FS/PPR |
11 |
7 |
7 |
15 |
12 |
7 |
11 |
9 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
28 |
20 |
11 |
19 |
0 |
16 |
188 |
Opp |
@ bal
|
cin
|
was
|
@ dal
|
ind
|
@ pit
|
@ cin
|
lvr
|
bye
|
hou
|
phi
|
@ jac
|
@ ten
|
bal
|
@ nyg
|
@ nyj
|
pit
|
|
|
|
2019 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
rshYds |
10
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10 |
rushes |
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
67
|
32
|
62
|
167
|
75
|
36
|
-
|
65
|
51
|
97
|
43
|
148
|
76
|
76
|
23
|
74
|
82
|
1174 |
Tar/Rec |
7/4 |
7/3 |
9/3 |
10/8 |
6/4 |
5/3 |
- |
10/5 |
13/6 |
10/9 |
7/4 |
13/10 |
11/6 |
7/4 |
8/5 |
9/7 |
6/2 |
138/83 |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
6 |
FScore |
7 |
3 |
6 |
16 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
15 |
10 |
26 |
7 |
7 |
2 |
7 |
14 |
154 |
FS/PPR |
11 |
6 |
9 |
24 |
11 |
6 |
0 |
11 |
17 |
24 |
14 |
36 |
13 |
11 |
7 |
14 |
16 |
237 |
Opp |
@ bal
|
cin
|
was
|
@ dal
|
ind
|
@ pit
|
@ cin
|
lvr
|
bye
|
hou
|
phi
|
@ jac
|
@ ten
|
bal
|
@ nyg
|
@ nyj
|
pit
|
|
|
|
2018 Stats | CLE | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
91% |
95% |
86% |
89% |
100% |
99% |
99% |
81% |
97% |
68% |
- |
61% |
81% |
81% |
85% |
84% |
95% |
88% |
rshYds |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
54
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
60 |
rushes |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
3 |
rshTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
recYds |
106
|
69
|
103
|
34
|
69
|
11
|
97
|
39
|
50
|
22
|
-
|
30
|
103
|
57
|
37
|
47
|
102
|
976 |
Tar/Rec |
15/7 |
7/5 |
14/8 |
10/4 |
11/5 |
10/2 |
15/10 |
12/8 |
7/6 |
5/2 |
- |
5/3 |
9/6 |
4/3 |
8/3 |
8/4 |
9/5 |
149/81 |
TM Tar% |
38% |
23% |
42% |
24% |
24% |
20% |
45% |
36% |
17% |
25% |
- |
20% |
23% |
17% |
26% |
22% |
22% |
27% |
recTDs |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
4 |
FScore |
10 |
6 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
1 |
15 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
23 |
3 |
8 |
16 |
136 |
FS/PPR |
17 |
11 |
18 |
13 |
11 |
3 |
25 |
11 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
6 |
16 |
26 |
6 |
12 |
21 |
217 |
Opp |
pit
|
@ no
|
nyj
|
@ oak
|
bal
|
lac
|
@ tb
|
@ pit
|
kc
|
atl
|
bye
|
@ cin
|
@ hou
|
car
|
@ den
|
cin
|
@ bal
|
|
|
|
2017 Stats | MIA | Week | |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
TOT |
TM Snap % |
- |
91% |
95% |
88% |
83% |
97% |
96% |
89% |
99% |
93% |
84% |
85% |
79% |
90% |
93% |
96% |
- |
91% |
rshYds |
-
|
-7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-7 |
rushes |
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1 |
rshTDs |
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
recYds |
-
|
78
|
48
|
40
|
44
|
62
|
93
|
33
|
32
|
42
|
95
|
70
|
62
|
46
|
99
|
51
|
92
|
987 |
Tar/Rec |
- |
15/13 |
11/6 |
7/6 |
10/5 |
14/8 |
11/7 |
12/5 |
7/6 |
10/5 |
11/6 |
9/8 |
6/5 |
8/8 |
13/10 |
7/5 |
10/9 |
161/112 |
TM Tar% |
- |
44% |
25% |
25% |
38% |
42% |
31% |
27% |
17% |
27% |
31% |
27% |
19% |
24% |
27% |
19% |
- |
28% |
recTDs |
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
9 |
FScore |
0 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
10 |
12 |
15 |
3 |
9 |
10 |
15 |
7 |
6 |
16 |
9 |
5 |
15 |
152 |
FS/PPR |
0 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
22 |
8 |
15 |
15 |
21 |
15 |
11 |
24 |
19 |
10 |
24 |
264 |
Opp |
bye
|
@ lac
|
@ nyj
|
no
|
ten
|
@ atl
|
nyj
|
@ bal
|
oak
|
@ car
|
tb
|
@ ne
|
den
|
ne
|
@ buf
|
@ kc
|
buf
|
|
|
|
Jarvis Landry 2020 Outlook
It turns out Landry needed surgery after all. The veteran WR told reporters during the Pro Bowl he played the entire 2019 season with a hip injury but planned just to rehab. Instead, Landry went under the knife, having successful surgery on Feb. 4. As NFL.com noted, "The good news is Landry is expected to make a full recovery for the 2020 season. The bad news is that it's never great when your body needs to get cut open. ..." All that said, despite suffering the injury early in the campaign, Landry didn't miss a start, compiling 83 catches for 1,174 yards and six TDs. With new coach Kevin Stefanski taking over, the Browns hope Landry and teammate Odell Beckham Jr. will be fully healthy (OBJ underwent his own surgery in January)and ready for a bounce-back campaign in 2020. Landry, however, might be the better fantasy value here. As ESPN's Mike Clay notes, Landry out-targeted Beckham 139 to 132 last season. In fact, Landry's target share by season since 2015 has been incredibly consistent (29 percent, 29 percent, 27 percent, 27 percent and 27 percent). Perhaps their roles will change somewhat under Stefanski, but Landry's floor remains solid.
Jarvis Landry 2019 Outlook
A little over a year ago, Landry was moving from Florida to Ohio. Now, a year and a couple months after being traded from the Dolphins to the Browns, Landry is witnessing GM John Dorsey do everything in his power to transform the Browns into a legitimate contender. So far, Landry likes what he's seeing, including the acquisition of his best friend and former college teammate, Odell Beckham Jr., in a blockbuster trade. Many of these changes have come as a direct result of the Browns selecting, inserting and discovering a franchise quarterback in Baker Mayfield. So, additional weapons (which will include Kareem Hunt once he serves his eight-game suspension) are great for the offense. Will they be great for Landry? One argument suggests Landry will benefit from Beckham across the field drawing heavier defensive coverage. Another is that things weren't so great with Landry serving as the primary threat, so why will he excel in a secondary role? Worth noting, Landry averaged 11.8 targets per game before new HC Freddie Kitchens took over as OC last year and just 6.9 in the final eight games. That number could shrink even further with Beckham now on the team and other offensive weapons emerging. If we consider Landry's fantasy appeal has historically been volume-based, you have to wonder how just big a hit he'll take this season.
Jarvis Landry 2018 Outlook
Landry, who came to Cleveland via trade with the Dolphins, subsequently signed a contract extension that will make him not only the fifth-highest paid receiver (and the highest inside receiver) in the league, but also a core piece of the Browns' offense for years to come. A 2013 second-round pick, the 25-year-old Landry topped 80 catches in each of his first four seasons, racking up the third-most receptions (400) in the NFL during that stretch. No player in NFL history caught more passes in his first four seasons than Landry, who beat Anquan Boldin's previous record by 58. He broke the Dolphins' franchise record this past season with 112 catches, a career-high that also led the NFL. Landry promises to be a key cog in a Browns offense that will have new faces across the field, including veteran QB Tyrod Taylor and RB Carlos Hyde (along with incoming rookies Baker Mayfield and Nick Chubb). He joins a wide receiving corps set to return Pro Bowler Josh Gordon and third-year, former first-round pick Corey Coleman. It will be interesting to watch how the current personnel and newcomers come together, but expect Landry's role to be as prominent as fantasy managers hope.
| | | |