• Career Stats
    RushingReceiving
    YearGPRrsh/ydsaveTDsrec/ydsaveTDsFSV
    20186 108 0/0 0.0 0 14/235 16.8 2 50
    20179 109 0/0 0.0 0 20/240 12.0 1 50
    201616 20 8/21 2.6 1 77/1007 13.1 4 212
    20153 174 1/-1 -1.0 0 1/42 42.0 0 5
    201311 156/271 1798 7/11 83/576 2 188
    20123 14/30 155 2/1 10/51 1 29
  • (Month:Week)
2018 Stats | NYJWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 40% 68% 70% 4% 21% 62% - - 82% 42% - - - - - - - 51%
rshYds 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - -1 0 - - - - - - - -1
rushes 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 1 0 - - - - - - - 1
rshTDs 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 0 0 - - - - - - - 0
recYds 49 84 25 0 20 57 - - 17 0 - - - - - - - 252
Tar/Rec 3/3 8/4 3/1 1/0 1/1 6/5 - - 5/2 3/0 - - - - - - - 30/16
TM Tar% 14% 20% 10% 3% 6% 21% - - 11% 0% - - - - - - - 12%
recTDs 0 0 0 0 1 1 - - 0 0 - - - - - - - 2
FScore 4 8 2 0 8 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
FS/PPR 7 12 3 0 9 16 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53
Opp @ bal lac @ min @ gb ten @ hou @ ind ne chi @ nyj bye jac @ mia nyj det @ ne mia  
 
2017 Stats | WASWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 84% 73% 84% 86% - 82% 47% 32% 56% 37% - - - - - - - 64%
recYds 66 31 19 70 - 23 14 0 17 - - - - - - - - 240
Tar/Rec 11/6 4/2 4/2 5/3 - 5/3 4/2 1/0 3/2 - - - - - - - - 37/20
TM Tar% 26% 15% 13% 22% - 14% 10% 3% 10% 0% - - - - - - - 12%
recTDs 0 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - 1
FScore 6 3 1 13 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
FS/PPR 12 5 3 16 0 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49
Opp phi @ lar oak @ kc bye sf @ phi dal @ sea min @ no nyg @ dal @ lac ari den @ nyg  
 
2016 Stats | CLEWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOT
TM Snap % 88% 90% 95% 93% 100% 96% 48% 82% 93% 86% 88% 87% - 91% 84% 93% 82% 87%
rshYds 0 0 21 -6 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 21
rushes 0 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 8
rshTDs 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 1
recYds 68 32 144 46 48 75 18 101 47 48 97 131 - 3 19 36 94 1007
Tar/Rec 7/3 10/3 14/8 9/5 6/5 13/9 4/2 12/6 7/5 9/5 10/5 12/6 - 3/1 8/4 5/3 11/7 140/77
TM Tar% 27% 30% 37% 24% 17% 31% 13% 24% 26% 29% 25% 29% - 11% 31% 19% 30% 25%
recTDs 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 4
FScore 6 3 24 10 5 19 1 10 10 4 9 13 0 0 1 3 9 134
FS/PPR 9 6 32 15 10 28 3 16 15 9 14 19 0 1 5 6 16 211
Opp @ phi bal @ mia @ was ne @ ten @ cin nyj dal @ bal pit nyg bye cin @ buf sd @ pit  
 

Terrelle Pryor 2018 Outlook
The Jets agreed to terms with Pryor, who is coming off a disappointing season in Washington -- to put it mildly. Pryor tallied a mere 240 receiving yards with one touchdown in nine appearances (two starts) with the Redskins last year. Cleary not what the Redskins -- or fantasy owners -- were looking for. But Pryor was terrific for the Cleveland Browns during a breakout, 1,000-yard season 2016. As ESPN.com's Rich Cimini suggests, if the Jets get that version, it could be a home run. Remember as well, the Jets don't have any pass-catching TEs now that Austin Seferian-Jenkins is gone, but they do go four deep at receiver. They have three big-bodied wideouts in Pryor (6-4), Robby Anderson (6-3) and Quincy Enunwa (6-2). They also have Jermaine Kearse (6-1). According to Cimini, new OC Jeremy Bates needs big targets to run his West Coast offense, which relies on yards after the catch -- and now he has them. One reminder: Pryor, who turned 29 in June, played last season with an injured ankle, finally having surgery in November. He contends that's the reason for his poor showing in Washington. We'll all find out soon enough if that's the case. The positive here is, much like the Jets did, fantasy owners will be able to land Pryor (if they so desire) at a discount.

Terrelle Pryor 2017 Outlook
Pryor signed a one-year deal worth $8 million with Washington shortly after free agency opened in March. The one-year term isn't a shocker given the Redskins reluctance to even tie up their own franchise quarterback, Kirk Cousins, with a long-term deal, and the short contract probably works from Pryor's perspective as well. He has something to prove. As a converted quarterback, Pryor came out of nowhere last year to catch 77 passes for 1,077 yard despite dealing with a dysfunctional quarterback situation and slightly less-than-mediocre offense in Cleveland. Even more interesting is how Pryor fared against the NFL's top cover corners. Thanks to impressive outings against Miami's Byron Maxwell, the Titans Jason McCourty, Darrelle Revis and the Giants' Janoris Jenkins, only A.J. Green fared better than Pryor did against shadow coverage last season. Combine those successes with the team's poor quarterback play and his unimpressive supporting cast and you could make an argument that his 2016 season wasn't a fluke. We're not saying Pryor is headed for elite territory yet -- nor should you pay for him as such. But a fantasy WR2? Not a stretch at all.